IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-60273-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-year-olds’ visual exploration of response options during memory decisions predicts metamemory monitoring one year later

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Leckey

    (University of California, Davis
    University of California, Davis)

  • Diana Selmeczy

    (University of Colorado, Colorado Springs)

  • Simona Ghetti

    (University of California, Davis
    University of California, Davis)

Abstract

Introspection on memory states guides decision-making, but little is known about how it emerges in childhood. Toddlers’ behavioral responses to difficult memory decisions (e.g., information seeking) suggest early capacity to track uncertain situations, but it is unclear whether these behaviors relate to later emerging capacity to introspect on memory accuracy (i.e., metamemory monitoring). In a pre-registered longitudinal study, 176 25- to 34-month-olds encode images, then are asked to select the familiar image from arrays that also include a new image (Time 1). One year later (Time 2), 157 participants complete a similar memory task and report decision confidence. Higher gaze transitions between responses, indicative of evaluation processes, faster response latencies, and greater memory at Time 1 predict Time 2 metamemory monitoring (i.e., greater confidence for accurate than inaccurate decisions). At Time 2, gaze transitions are associated with lower overall confidence. Overall, this research reveals potential building blocks of emerging metamemory monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Leckey & Diana Selmeczy & Simona Ghetti, 2025. "Two-year-olds’ visual exploration of response options during memory decisions predicts metamemory monitoring one year later," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60273-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-60273-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60273-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-60273-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60273-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.