Author
Listed:
- Kurt A. Fesenmyer
(The Nature Conservancy)
- Erin E. Poor
(The Nature Conservancy)
- Drew E. Terasaki Hart
(The Nature Conservancy
CSIRO Environment)
- Joseph W. Veldman
(Texas A&M University)
- Forrest Fleischman
(University of Minnesota)
- Pooja Choksi
(University of Minnesota)
- Sally Archibald
(University of the Witwatersrand)
- Mohammed Armani
(Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)
- Matthew E. Fagan
(University of Maryland)
- Evan C. Fricke
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- César Terrer
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Natalia Hasler
(Clark University)
- Christopher A. Williams
(Clark University)
- Peter W. Ellis
(The Nature Conservancy)
- Susan C. Cook-Patton
(The Nature Conservancy)
Abstract
Reforestation is a prominent climate change mitigation strategy, but available global maps of reforestation potential are widely criticized and highly variable, which limits their ability to provide robust estimates of both the locations and total area of opportunity. Here we develop global maps that address common critiques, build on a review of 89 reforestation maps created at multiple scales, and present eight reforestation scenarios with varying objectives, including providing ecosystem services, minimizing social conflicts, and delivering government policies. Across scenarios, we find up to 195 Mha (million hectares) are available (2225 TgCO2e (teragrams of carbon dioxide equivalent) per year total net mitigation potential), which is 71–92% smaller than previous estimates because of conservative modeling choices, incorporation of safeguards, and use of recent, high-resolution datasets. This area drops as low as 6 Mha (53 TgCO2e per year total net mitigation potential) if only statutorily protected areas are targeted. Few locations simultaneously achieve multiple objectives, suggesting that a mix of lands and restoration motivations will be needed to capitalize on the many potential benefits of reforestation.
Suggested Citation
Kurt A. Fesenmyer & Erin E. Poor & Drew E. Terasaki Hart & Joseph W. Veldman & Forrest Fleischman & Pooja Choksi & Sally Archibald & Mohammed Armani & Matthew E. Fagan & Evan C. Fricke & César Terrer , 2025.
"Addressing critiques refines global estimates of reforestation potential for climate change mitigation,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-59799-8
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59799-8
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-59799-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.