IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-35038-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource sharing is sufficient for the emergence of division of labour

Author

Listed:
  • Jan J. Kreider

    (University of Groningen)

  • Thijs Janzen

    (University of Groningen)

  • Abel Bernadou

    (University of Regensburg
    Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (CRCA), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS)

  • Daniel Elsner

    (University of Groningen
    University of Freiburg)

  • Boris H. Kramer

    (University of Groningen)

  • Franz J. Weissing

    (University of Groningen)

Abstract

Division of labour occurs in a broad range of organisms. Yet, how division of labour can emerge in the absence of pre-existing interindividual differences is poorly understood. Using a simple but realistic model, we show that in a group of initially identical individuals, division of labour emerges spontaneously if returning foragers share part of their resources with other group members. In the absence of resource sharing, individuals follow an activity schedule of alternating between foraging and other tasks. If non-foraging individuals are fed by other individuals, their alternating activity schedule becomes interrupted, leading to task specialisation and the emergence of division of labour. Furthermore, nutritional differences between individuals reinforce division of labour. Such differences can be caused by increased metabolic rates during foraging or by dominance interactions during resource sharing. Our model proposes a plausible mechanism for the self-organised emergence of division of labour in animal groups of initially identical individuals. This mechanism could also play a role for the emergence of division of labour during the major evolutionary transitions to eusociality and multicellularity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan J. Kreider & Thijs Janzen & Abel Bernadou & Daniel Elsner & Boris H. Kramer & Franz J. Weissing, 2022. "Resource sharing is sufficient for the emergence of division of labour," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-35038-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35038-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35038-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-35038-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Bonabeau & Guy Theraulaz & Jean-Louis Deneubourg, 1998. "Fixed Response Thresholds and the Regulation of Division of Labor in Insect Societies," Working Papers 98-01-009, Santa Fe Institute.
    2. Mor Salomon & David Mayntz & Yael Lubin, 2008. "Colony nutrition skews reproduction in a social spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 605-611.
    3. Gro V. Amdam & Angela Csondes & M. Kim Fondrk & Robert E. Page, 2006. "Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7072), pages 76-78, January.
    4. Martin Ackermann & Bärbel Stecher & Nikki E. Freed & Pascal Songhet & Wolf-Dietrich Hardt & Michael Doebeli, 2008. "Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7207), pages 987-990, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria-del-Mar Bibiloni-Femenias & José Guerrero & Juan-José Miñana & Oscar Valero, 2021. "Indistinguishability Operators via Yager t -norms and Their Applications to Swarm Multi-Agent Task Allocation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Manalee Vishnu Surve & Smita Bhutda & Akshay Datey & Anjali Anil & Shalini Rawat & Athira Pushpakaran & Dipty Singh & Kwang Sik Kim & Dipshikha Chakravortty & Anirban Banerjee, 2018. "Heterogeneity in pneumolysin expression governs the fate of Streptococcus pneumoniae during blood-brain barrier trafficking," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Thomas Owen Richardson & Kim Christensen & Nigel Rigby Franks & Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen & Ana Blagovestova Sendova-Franks, 2011. "Ants in a Labyrinth: A Statistical Mechanics Approach to the Division of Labour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Peña, Jorge & Nöldeke, Georg & Lehmann, Laurent, 2014. "Relatedness and synergies of kind and scale in the evolution of helping," Working papers 2014/09, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Scholl, Armin & Wopperer, Nico, 2012. "Resequencing of mixed-model assembly lines: Survey and research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 594-604.
    6. Anne-Stéphanie Rueff & Renske Raaphorst & Surya D. Aggarwal & Javier Santos-Moreno & Géraldine Laloux & Yolanda Schaerli & Jeffrey N. Weiser & Jan-Willem Veening, 2023. "Synthetic genetic oscillators demonstrate the functional importance of phenotypic variation in pneumococcal-host interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. James R. Carey, 2008. "Biodemography: Research prospects and directions," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(50), pages 1749-1758.
    8. Marcel García & Jose Aguilar & María D. R-Moreno, 2024. "An Autonomous Distributed Coordination Strategy for Sustainable Consumption in a Microgrid Based on a Bio-Inspired Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-28, February.
    9. Karolina Kuszewska & Michal Woyciechowski, 2015. "Age at Which Larvae Are Orphaned Determines Their Development into Typical or Rebel Workers in the Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    10. Peña, Jorge & Cooper, Guy Alexander & Liu, Ming & West, Stuart Andrew, 2020. "Dividing labour in social microorganisms: coordinated or random specialisation?," IAST Working Papers 20-104, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    11. Chao Tong & Leticia Avilés & Linda S. Rayor & Alexander S. Mikheyev & Timothy A. Linksvayer, 2022. "Genomic signatures of recent convergent transitions to social life in spiders," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Karl P. Gerhardt & Satyajit D. Rao & Evan J. Olson & Oleg A. Igoshin & Jeffrey J. Tabor, 2021. "Independent control of mean and noise by convolution of gene expression distributions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Alistair M Senior & Michael A Charleston & Mathieu Lihoreau & Jerome Buhl & David Raubenheimer & Stephen J Simpson, 2015. "Evolving Nutritional Strategies in the Presence of Competition: A Geometric Agent-Based Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Si Tang & Yaqing Liu & Jianming Zhu & Xueyu Cheng & Lu Liu & Katrin Hammerschmidt & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Cai, 2024. "Bet hedging in a unicellular microalga," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Czuppon, Peter & Gokhale, Chaitanya S., 2018. "Disentangling eco-evolutionary effects on trait fixation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 93-107.
    16. Patrick Kaiser & Emma Slack & Andrew J Grant & Wolf-Dietrich Hardt & Roland R Regoes, 2013. "Lymph Node Colonization Dynamics after Oral Salmonella Typhimurium Infection in Mice," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Anna Dornhaus, 2011. "Finding optimal collective strategies using individual-based simulations: colony organization in social insects," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 25-37, May.
    18. Te Wu & Long Wang & Feng Fu, 2017. "Coevolutionary dynamics of phenotypic diversity and contingent cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Pierre-André Eyer & Julien Freyer & Serge Aron, 2013. "Genetic polyethism in the polyandrous desert ant Cataglyphis cursor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 144-151.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-35038-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.