IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jas888/v8y2020i2p622-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Viability of Conventional Sprinkler Irrigation in Sudan Grass Production for Beef Cattle

Author

Listed:
  • Wellington Mezzomo
  • Marcia Xavier Peiter
  • Adroaldo Dias Robaina
  • Anderson Crestani Pereira
  • Jhosefe Bruning
  • Miguel Chaiben Neto
  • Ricardo Boscaini
  • Luis Humberto Bahú Ben
  • Jardel Henrique Kirchner
  • Bruna Dalcin Pimenta
  • Rogério Ricalde Torres
  • Ricardo Benetti Rosso

Abstract

The supplementary irrigation is an alternative to ensure forage production and quality in periods with irregular rainfall, however, is necessary to know the irrigation economic viability in order to maximize profits. The study was performed in Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State in southern Brazil, during 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 agricultural years, aiming to evaluate the sudan grass economic viability under different irrigation depths, in order to define which irrigation depth (0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125% of the reference evapotranspiration-ETo) has the highest net revenue. Forage production functions were generated and allowed to establish the carrying capacity and production costs related to each applied irrigation depth. The forage supply was 4% of the liveweight, animals with 300 kg were considered, and average daily liveweight (LW) gains of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 kg LW day-1 were simulated for the conversion of dry mass production in liveweight gain per hectare. Gross revenue was determined considering the price of R$ 6.50 per kilogram of liveweight. The production costs were divided into fixed and variable, related and not related to irrigation. The conventional sprinkler irrigation was economically viable for the sudan grass cultivation for beef cattle production, with the highest net revenue for the irrigation depth of 100% of ETo, in both years. However, the animals feed conversion is the determinant factor in net revenue because it represents the greatest profits variation source.

Suggested Citation

  • Wellington Mezzomo & Marcia Xavier Peiter & Adroaldo Dias Robaina & Anderson Crestani Pereira & Jhosefe Bruning & Miguel Chaiben Neto & Ricardo Boscaini & Luis Humberto Bahú Ben & Jardel Henrique Kir, 2020. "Economic Viability of Conventional Sprinkler Irrigation in Sudan Grass Production for Beef Cattle," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 622-642, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:622-642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/16569/13193
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/16569
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paredes, P. & Rodrigues, G.C. & Alves, I. & Pereira, L.S., 2014. "Partitioning evapotranspiration, yield prediction and economic returns of maize under various irrigation management strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 27-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.
    2. Monjardino, Marta & Harrison, Matthew T. & DeVoil, Peter & Rodriguez, Daniel & Sadras, Victor O., 2022. "Agronomic and on-farm infrastructure adaptations to manage economic risk in Australian irrigated broadacre systems: A case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Qin, Shujing & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Wang, Yahui & Guo, Hui, 2019. "Transpiration of female and male parents of seed maize in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 397-409.
    4. Liu, Meihan & Paredes, Paula & Shi, Haibin & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dou, Xu & Dai, Liping & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Impacts of a shallow saline water table on maize evapotranspiration and groundwater contribution using static water table lysimeters and the dual Kc water balance model SIMDualKc," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    5. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Aouade, G. & Ezzahar, J. & Amenzou, N. & Er-Raki, S. & Benkaddour, A. & Khabba, S. & Jarlan, L., 2016. "Combining stable isotopes, Eddy Covariance system and meteorological measurements for partitioning evapotranspiration, of winter wheat, into soil evaporation and plant transpiration in a semi-arid reg," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 181-192.
    7. Peake, A.S. & Carberry, P.S. & Raine, S.R. & Gett, V. & Smith, R.J., 2016. "An alternative approach to whole-farm deficit irrigation analysis: Evaluating the risk-efficiency of wheat irrigation strategies in sub-tropical Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 61-76.
    8. Xu, Gaoping & Xue, Xuzhang & Wang, Pu & Yang, Zhaoshun & Yuan, Wenya & Liu, Xiufeng & Lou, Chenjun, 2018. "A lysimeter study for the effects of different canopy sizes on evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of summer maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1-6.
    9. Miao, Qingfeng & Rosa, Ricardo D. & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Zhu, Li & Dai, Jiaxin & Gonçalves, José M. & Pereira, Luis S., 2016. "Modeling water use, transpiration and soil evaporation of spring wheat–maize and spring wheat–sunflower relay intercropping using the dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 211-229.
    10. Adeboye, Omotayo B. & Schultz, Bart & Adekalu, Kenneth O. & Prasad, Krishna C., 2019. "Performance evaluation of AquaCrop in simulating soil water storage, yield, and water productivity of rainfed soybeans (Glycine max L. merr) in Ile-Ife, Nigeria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1130-1146.
    11. Minhas, P.S. & Ramos, Tiago B. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Pereira, Luis S., 2020. "Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Paredes, Paula & Rodrigues, Gonçalo C. & Cameira, Maria do Rosário & Torres, Maria Odete & Pereira, Luis S., 2017. "Assessing yield, water productivity and farm economic returns of malt barley as influenced by the sowing dates and supplemental irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 132-143.
    13. Cancela, J.J. & Fandiño, M. & Rey, B.J. & Martínez, E.M., 2015. "Automatic irrigation system based on dual crop coefficient, soil and plant water status for Vitis vinifera (cv Godello and cv Mencía)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 52-63.
    14. Chen, Jinliang & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Guo, Ping & Qiu, Rangjian & Chen, Renqiang & Gu, Feng, 2014. "Modeling relations of tomato yield and fruit quality with water deficit at different growth stages under greenhouse condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 131-148.
    15. Karandish, Fatemeh & Šimůnek, Jiří, 2018. "An application of the water footprint assessment to optimize production of crops irrigated with saline water: A scenario assessment with HYDRUS," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 67-82.
    16. Karandish, Fatemeh & Šimůnek, Jiří, 2017. "Two-dimensional modeling of nitrogen and water dynamics for various N-managed water-saving irrigation strategies using HYDRUS," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 174-190.
    17. Paredes, Paula & D’Agostino, Daniela & Assif, Mahdi & Todorovic, Mladen & Pereira, Luis S., 2018. "Assessing potato transpiration, yield and water productivity under various water regimes and planting dates using the FAO dual Kc approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 11-24.
    18. Paredes, Paula & Martins, Diogo S. & Pereira, Luis Santos & Cadima, Jorge & Pires, Carlos, 2018. "Accuracy of daily estimation of grass reference evapotranspiration using ERA-Interim reanalysis products with assessment of alternative bias correction schemes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 340-353.
    19. Wu, Zhangsheng & Li, Yue & Wang, Rong & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua, 2023. "Evaluation of irrigation water saving and salinity control practices of maize and sunflower in the upper Yellow River basin with an agro-hydrological model based method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    20. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:622-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.