IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v52y2025i1d10.1007_s11116-023-10412-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-dependent estimation of origin–destination matrices using partial path data and link counts

Author

Listed:
  • Milad Vahidi

    (Sharif University of Technology)

  • Yousef Shafahi

    (Sharif University of Technology)

Abstract

The precise estimation of time-varying demand matrices using traffic data is an essential step for planning, scheduling, and evaluating advanced traffic management systems. This paper presents an innovative method, based on the least squares approach, to handle the inherent complexities of estimating the dynamic characteristics of changing demand flow over time while considering congestion conditions. The time-dependent origin–destination (OD) demand matrices of the network are estimated by exploiting the received partial paths data from an automated vehicle identification system and vehicle counts data from loop detectors on a subset of the links. A traffic assignment approach based on partial paths is embedded into the measurement equations of the least squares model. For all time intervals, the relation between the variable aspects of congestion (the temporal and spatial distribution of the OD traffic flows) is established by their variance–covariance matrices. The LSQR algorithm, an iterative algorithm that is logically equivalent to the conjugate gradient method, is employed for solving the proposed least squares problem. Numerical examples are performed on three different approaches: utilizing only link counts data, utilizing only partial path flows data, and utilizing both of them. The results demonstrate that using variance–covariance matrices provides more precise estimates for time-dependent OD matrices. The effectiveness of the solution algorithm and the main ideas of the model are examined using the Sioux-Falls and Sodermalm networks. This paper reports the features of the discussed model based on different data as a proof of concept that incorporating partial path flows significantly improves the results for solving time-dependent OD matrix estimation problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Milad Vahidi & Yousef Shafahi, 2025. "Time-dependent estimation of origin–destination matrices using partial path data and link counts," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 55-92, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10412-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10412-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-023-10412-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-023-10412-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castillo, J. M. Del & Benítez, F. G., 1995. "On the functional form of the speed-density relationship--I: General theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 373-389, October.
    2. Cascetta, Ennio & Nguyen, Sang, 1988. "A unified framework for estimating or updating origin/destination matrices from traffic counts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 437-455, December.
    3. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    4. Maher, Michael J. & Zhang, Xiaoyan & Vliet, Dirck Van, 2001. "A bi-level programming approach for trip matrix estimation and traffic control problems with stochastic user equilibrium link flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 23-40, January.
    5. Ennio Cascetta & Domenico Inaudi & Gérald Marquis, 1993. "Dynamic Estimators of Origin-Destination Matrices Using Traffic Counts," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 363-373, November.
    6. M. Bierlaire & F. Crittin, 2004. "An Efficient Algorithm for Real-Time Estimation and Prediction of Dynamic OD Tables," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 116-127, February.
    7. Yang, Hai & Sasaki, Tsuna & Iida, Yasunori & Asakura, Yasuo, 1992. "Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 417-434, December.
    8. Van Zuylen, Henk J. & Willumsen, Luis G., 1980. "The most likely trip matrix estimated from traffic counts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 281-293, September.
    9. Bera, Sharminda & Rao, K. V. Krishna, 2011. "Estimation of origin-destination matrix from traffic counts: the state of the art," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 49, pages 2-23.
    10. Mojtaba Rostami Nasab & Yousef Shafahi, 2020. "Estimation of origin–destination matrices using link counts and partial path data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 2923-2950, December.
    11. Hadavi, Majid & Shafahi, Yousef, 2016. "Vehicle identification sensor models for origin–destination estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 82-106.
    12. Hazelton, Martin L., 2001. "Inference for origin-destination matrices: estimation, prediction and reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 667-676, August.
    13. Cascetta, Ennio, 1984. "Estimation of trip matrices from traffic counts and survey data: A generalized least squares estimator," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(4-5), pages 289-299.
    14. Spiess, Heinz, 1987. "A maximum likelihood model for estimating origin-destination matrices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 395-412, October.
    15. Enrique Castillo & Pilar Jiménez & José Menéndez & María Nogal, 2013. "A Bayesian method for estimating traffic flows based on plate scanning," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 173-201, January.
    16. Bierlaire, M. & Toint, Ph. L., 1995. "Meuse: An origin-destination matrix estimator that exploits structure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 47-60, February.
    17. Yasuo Asakura & Eiji Hato & Masuo Kashiwadani, 2000. "Origin-destination matrices estimation model using automatic vehicle identification data and its application to the Han-Shin expressway network," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 419-438, December.
    18. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Jiménez, Pilar, 2008. "Trip matrix and path flow reconstruction and estimation based on plate scanning and link observations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 455-481, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Louis Grange & Felipe González & Shlomo Bekhor, 2017. "Path Flow and Trip Matrix Estimation Using Link Flow Density," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 173-195, March.
    2. Yang, Yudi & Fan, Yueyue & Wets, Roger J.B., 2018. "Stochastic travel demand estimation: Improving network identifiability using multi-day observation sets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 192-211.
    3. Menon, Aditya Krishna & Cai, Chen & Wang, Weihong & Wen, Tao & Chen, Fang, 2015. "Fine-grained OD estimation with automated zoning and sparsity regularisation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 150-172.
    4. Lundgren, Jan T. & Peterson, Anders, 2008. "A heuristic for the bilevel origin-destination-matrix estimation problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 339-354, May.
    5. Shao, Hu & Lam, William H.K. & Sumalee, Agachai & Chen, Anthony & Hazelton, Martin L., 2014. "Estimation of mean and covariance of peak hour origin–destination demands from day-to-day traffic counts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 52-75.
    6. Hai Yang & Qiang Meng & Michael G. H. Bell, 2001. "Simultaneous Estimation of the Origin-Destination Matrices and Travel-Cost Coefficient for Congested Networks in a Stochastic User Equilibrium," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 107-123, May.
    7. Flurin S. Hänseler & Nicholas A. Molyneaux & Michel Bierlaire, 2017. "Estimation of Pedestrian Origin-Destination Demand in Train Stations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 981-997, August.
    8. Doblas, Javier & Benitez, Francisco G., 2005. "An approach to estimating and updating origin-destination matrices based upon traffic counts preserving the prior structure of a survey matrix," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 565-591, August.
    9. Dimitris Bertsimas & Julia Yan, 2018. "From Physical Properties of Transportation Flows to Demand Estimation: An Optimization Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 1002-1011, August.
    10. Yang, Yudi & Fan, Yueyue, 2015. "Data dependent input control for origin–destination demand estimation using observability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 385-403.
    11. Gunnar Flötteröd & Michel Bierlaire & Kai Nagel, 2011. "Bayesian Demand Calibration for Dynamic Traffic Simulations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 541-561, November.
    12. Bielli, Maurizio & Reverberi, Pierfrancesco, 1996. "New operations research and artificial intelligence approaches to traffic engineering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 550-572, August.
    13. Michel Bierlaire & Frank Crittin, 2006. "Solving Noisy, Large-Scale Fixed-Point Problems and Systems of Nonlinear Equations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 44-63, February.
    14. Walpen, Jorgelina & Mancinelli, Elina M. & Lotito, Pablo A., 2015. "A heuristic for the OD matrix adjustment problem in a congested transport network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 807-819.
    15. Abdullah Alshehri & Mahmoud Owais & Jayadev Gyani & Mishal H. Aljarbou & Saleh Alsulamy, 2023. "Residual Neural Networks for Origin–Destination Trip Matrix Estimation from Traffic Sensor Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Juha-Matti Kuusinen & Janne Sorsa & Marja-Liisa Siikonen, 2015. "The Elevator Trip Origin-Destination Matrix Estimation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 559-576, August.
    17. Fu, Hao & Lam, William H.K. & Shao, Hu & Ma, Wei & Chen, Bi Yu & Ho, H.W., 2022. "Optimization of multi-type sensor locations for simultaneous estimation of origin-destination demands and link travel times with covariance effects," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 19-47.
    18. S. Travis Waller & Sai Chand & Aleksa Zlojutro & Divya Nair & Chence Niu & Jason Wang & Xiang Zhang & Vinayak V. Dixit, 2021. "Rapidex: A Novel Tool to Estimate Origin–Destination Trips Using Pervasive Traffic Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    19. Enrique Castillo & Pilar Jiménez & José Menéndez & María Nogal, 2013. "A Bayesian method for estimating traffic flows based on plate scanning," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 173-201, January.
    20. Hazelton, Martin L., 2000. "Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link flows on uncongested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 549-566, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10412-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.