IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/regeco/v4y1992i1p51-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Depreciation and the Regulated Firm under Competition and Technological Change

Author

Listed:
  • Crew, Michael A
  • Kleindorfer, Paul R

Abstract

Capital recovery is increasingly important to utilities especially telephone companies when technological change and competitive entry are occurring. In the absence of efficient capital recovery policies companies are going to see their equity eroded. In addition to losses by the companies there are likely to losses to ratepayers in the form of reductions in service quality and higher rates in the future. To address the above problem this paper first reviews economic depreciation and capital recovery in the simple case of a regulated single product monopoly facing competitive entry. It employs the concept of economic depreciation to show how capital recovery policies will be front-loaded. It also develops the concept of the window of opportunity for capital recovery. There is a limited time for regulators to take remedial action, and if timely action is not taken there is no alternative but for the company to fail to recover some of its capital. These results are shown under both traditional rate of return and price caps. Copyright 1992 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Crew, Michael A & Kleindorfer, Paul R, 1992. "Economic Depreciation and the Regulated Firm under Competition and Technological Change," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 51-61, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:4:y:1992:i:1:p:51-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gunther Friedl, 2011. "Kostenbasierte Preisregulierung, Realoptionen und Investitionsanreize," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(63), pages 136-156, January.
    2. Dominik Schober, 2013. "Refinancing under Yardstick Regulation with Investment Cycles–The Case of Long-Lived Electricity Network Assets," EWL Working Papers 1321, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, revised Jun 2013.
    3. Küpper, Hans-Ulrich & Pedell, Burkhard, 2016. "Which asset valuation and depreciation method should be used for regulated utilities? An analytical and simulation-based comparison," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 88-103.
    4. Gunther Friedl & Hans-Ulrich Küpper, 2011. "Historische Kosten oder Long Run Incremental Costs als Kostenmaßstab für die Preisgestaltung in regulierten Märkten?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(64), pages 98-128, January.
    5. Schober, Dominik & Weber, Christoph, 2015. "Refinancing under yardstick regulation with investment cycles: The case of long-lived electricity network assets," ZEW Discussion Papers 15-065, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Simshauser, Paul & Akimov, Alexandr, 2019. "Regulated electricity networks, investment mistakes in retrospect and stranded assets under uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 117-133.
    7. Kaserman, David L. & Mayo, John W., 1999. "Regulatory policies toward local exchange companies under emerging competition: guardrails or speed bumps on the information highway?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 367-388, December.
    8. Crawford, Garth, 2015. "Network depreciation and energy market disruption: Options to avoiding passing costs down the line," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 163-171.
    9. Simshauser, Paul, 2017. "Monopoly regulation, discontinuity & stranded assets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 384-398.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:4:y:1992:i:1:p:51-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.