IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v19y2019i1d10.1007_s11115-017-0387-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Theories in Hard Times? Assessing the Explanatory Power of Policy Theories in the Context of Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Georg Wenzelburger

    () (TU Kaiserslautern)

  • Pascal D. König

    (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt)

  • Frieder Wolf

    (Universität Heidelberg)

Abstract

Can the behavior of political actors in business-as-usual conditions be analyzed with the same theoretical framework as decision-making in situations characterized by uncertainty, ambiguity, complexity and urgency? After comparing major existing approaches and evaluating their explanatory logic under crisis circumstances, the present article develops a theoretical framework which explicitly accounts for the crisis characteristics at two stages of the policy making process, agenda-setting and decision-making. The bearing of policy-entrepreneurs, international networks, institutions and partisanship on policy outcomes critically depends on the specific workings on these levels in crisis-mode. These expectations are probed in an empirical re-evaluation of the 2011 Spanish pension reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Georg Wenzelburger & Pascal D. König & Frieder Wolf, 2019. "Policy Theories in Hard Times? Assessing the Explanatory Power of Policy Theories in the Context of Crisis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 97-118, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:19:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11115-017-0387-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-017-0387-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-017-0387-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hacker, Jacob S., 2004. "Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(2), pages 243-260, May.
    2. Immergut, Ellen M., 1990. "Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care ," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 391-416, October.
    3. Hibbs, Douglas A., 1977. "Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 1467-1487, December.
    4. B. Peters & Jon Pierre & Tiina Randma-Liiv, 2011. "Global Financial Crisis, Public Administration and Governance: Do New Problems Require New Solutions?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 13-27, March.
    5. Bearce, David H. & Bondanella, Stacy, 2007. "Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 61(4), pages 703-733, October.
    6. Ian Goldin & Mike Mariathasan, 2015. "The Butterfly Defect: How Globalization Creates Systemic Risks, and What to Do about It," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10214-2.
    7. Arjen Boin, 2009. "The New World of Crises and Crisis Management: Implications for Policymaking and Research," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(4), pages 367-377, July.
    8. Frank R. Baumgartner & Christian Breunig & Christoffer Green‐Pedersen & Bryan D. Jones & Peter B. Mortensen & Michiel Nuytemans & Stefaan Walgrave, 2009. "Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 603-620, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:19:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11115-017-0387-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.