Cartels, coalitions, and constitutional politics
While every industry desires political protection against the rigors of competition, no industry would see advantage in having that protection generalized to the entire economy. The ideal from the perspective of a given industry is to receive protections for itself, while the remainder of the economy remains competitive. Such a priviledged outcome is not possible, of course, in a broadly democratic regime, and the industry that obtains protections for itself does so by joining into a coalition, explicit or otherwise, which obtains protections for everyone in the coalition. A simple model is developed in which an equilibrium coalition emerges. While it is obviously better for an industry to be in, rather than outside, such an existing coalition, it is shown that even those who are members of a protected coalition may be better off under a constitutional regime that prevents any industry from receiving protections against competition. Copyright George Mason University 1991
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Bates, Robert H. & Rogerson, William P., .
"Agriculture in Development: A Coalitional Analysis,"
263, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
- Robert Bates & William Rogerson, 1980. "Agriculture in development: A coalitional analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 513-527, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:copoec:v:2:y:1991:i:2:p:139-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.