IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v66y2025i3d10.1007_s10614-024-10781-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Coupling-Coordination Between Developments of Economic High-Quality and Ecological Innovation of China’s Inter-Provinces

Author

Listed:
  • Yanrong Hu

    (Zhejiang A & F University)

  • Qingyang Liu

    (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)

  • Hongjiu Liu

    (Zhejiang A & F University)

Abstract

Based on Entropy TOPSIS, coupling coordination model, rank-size rule, spatial autocorrelation analysis, we studied spatial and temporal pattern of coupling coordination between economic high-quality development and ecological innovation in China's inter-provinces. The results show that: (1) From time dimension, the overall level of economic high-quality development and ecological innovation in China's provinces is not high, and the degree of coupling and coordination in most provinces is in an unbalanced stage, And the economic development speed is higher than the speed of ecological development of innovation; (2) From spatial dimension, the degree of coupling coordination between provinces presents significant spatial disequilibrium characteristics. There is a spatial clustering feature between similar values, and the spatial distribution autocorrelation and heterogeneity coexist.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanrong Hu & Qingyang Liu & Hongjiu Liu, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Coupling-Coordination Between Developments of Economic High-Quality and Ecological Innovation of China’s Inter-Provinces," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(3), pages 2383-2412, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10781-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10781-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-024-10781-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-024-10781-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming Xia & Xiangwu He & Hui Lin & Zhimin Xie & Yubin Zhou, 2022. "Analyzing the ecological relations of technology innovation of the Chinese high-tech industry based on the Lotka-Volterra model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Leonie Guerrero Lara & Laura M. Pereira & Federica Ravera & Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno, 2019. "Flipping the Tortilla : Social-Ecological Innovations and Traditional Ecological Knowledge for More Sustainable Agri-Food Systems in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Hui Zhang & Haiqian Ke, 2022. "Understanding the Heterogeneous Impact of Innovation Efficiency on Urban Ecological Footprint in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Shanlang Lin & Prithvi Raj Dhakal & Zhaowei Wu, 2021. "The Impact of High-Speed Railway on China’s Regional Economic Growth Based on the Perspective of Regional Heterogeneity of Quality of Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Menghua Deng & Junfei Chen & Feifei Tao & Jiulong Zhu & Min Wang, 2022. "On the Coupling and Coordination Development between Environment and Economy: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Smarandoiu (Sanda) Luana Alexandra, 2016. "An Empirical Approach Of Social Impact Of Debt On Economic Growth. Evidence From The European Union," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 189-198, October.
    7. Die Li & Sumin Hu, 2021. "How Does Technological Innovation Mediate the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Reginald Masocha, 2018. "Does Environmental Sustainability Impact Innovation, Ecological and Social Measures of Firm Performance of SMEs? Evidence from South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Yanhong Zhao & Peng Hou & Jinbao Jiang & Jun Zhai & Yan Chen & Yongcai Wang & Junjun Bai & Bing Zhang & Haitao Xu, 2021. "Coordination Study on Ecological and Economic Coupling of the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Xing Li & Fuzhou Luo & Wen-Long Shang, 2022. "Dynamic Measurement Analysis of Urban Innovation Ability and Ecological Efficiency in China," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-14, March.
    11. Isaac Dekker & Shabnam Sharifyazd & Evans Batung & Kristian L. Dubrawski, 2021. "Maximizing Benefits to Nature and Society in Techno-Ecological Innovation for Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haiqian Ke & Wenyi Yang & Xiaoyang Liu & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Marcello Risitano & Rosaria Romano & Vincenzo Rusciano & Gennaro Civero & Debora Scarpato, 2022. "The impact of sustainability on marketing strategy and business performance: The case of Italian fisheries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1538-1551, May.
    3. Yanfei Zhou, 2024. "Driving determinants and assessment of the coupling coordination of regional technological innovation-industrial upgrading-eco-environment system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6269-6291, March.
    4. Xueru Pang & Yuquan Zhou & Yiting Zhu & Chunshan Zhou, 2023. "Exploring the Coordination and Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of the Tourism–Economy–Environment Development in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Laura M. Pereira & Scott Drimie & Kristi Maciejewski & Patrick Bon Tonissen & Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, 2020. "Food System Transformation: Integrating a Political–Economy and Social–Ecological Approach to Regime Shifts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Coordinated Development between Urban Greening and Economic Growth in Chinese Cities during 2005 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Grace O’Connor & Kimberley Reis & Cheryl Desha & Ingrid Burkett, 2025. "Valuing farmers in transitions to more sustainable food systems: A systematic literature review of local food producers’ experiences and contributions in short food supply chains," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 565-592, March.
    8. Farman Ullah Khan & Daniel Badulescu, 2025. "Sustainability Pressures Unveiled: Navigating the Role of Organizational Sustainable Culture in Promoting Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Joseph Bakos & Michele Siu & Adalberto Orengo & Narges Kasiri, 2020. "An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & medium‐sized enterprises: Patterns and trends," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1285-1296, March.
    10. Reddy, A. Amarender & Bhattacharya, Anindita & Reddy, S. Venku & Ricart, Sandra, 2021. "Farmers’ Distress Index: An Approach for an Action Plan to Reduce Vulnerability in the Drylands of India," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(11), pages 1-1.
    11. Alaa Othman & Sara El Gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Investigating the Influences of Smart Port Practices and Technology Employment on Port Sustainable Performance: The Egypt Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Ludwig Paul B. Cabling & Kristian L. Dubrawski & Maleea Acker & Gregg Brill, 2024. "Harnessing Community Science to Support Implementation and Success of Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Zhongyun Ni & Yinbing Zhao & Jingjing Liu & Yongjun Li & Xiaojiang Xia & Yang Zhang, 2024. "Navigating Ecological–Economic Interactions: Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Drivers in the Lower Reaches of the Jinsha River," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-59, December.
    14. Chai Bin Feng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Raheel Safdar & Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Amjad Iqbal, 2023. "Corporate strategic responses, supplier concentration and sustainable growth of chinese listed firms," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1413-1427, September.
    15. Jiawei Wu & Wei Sun, 2023. "Regional Integration and Sustainable Development in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Towards a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    16. García-Granero, Eva M. & Piedra-Muñoz, Laura & Galdeano-Gómez, Emilio, 2020. "Measuring eco-innovation dimensions: The role of environmental corporate culture and commercial orientation," MPRA Paper 119909, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Philbin, Simon & Viswanathan, Radhakrishnan & Telukdarie, Arnesh, 2022. "Understanding how digital transformation can enable SMEs to achieve sustainable development: A systematic literature review," Small Business International Review, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas - AECA, vol. 6(1), pages 473-473, May.
    18. Isabel Salavisa & Maria Fátima Ferreiro & Sofia Bizarro, 2021. "The Transition of the Agro-Food System: Lessons from Organic Farming in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Ligang Wang & Dan Liu & Xinyi Wu & Xiaopu Zhang & Qiaoyang Liu & Weijiang Kong & Pingping Luo & Shengfu Yang, 2025. "Simulation Analysis of Land Use Change via the PLUS-GMOP Coupling Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.
    20. Chao Hung Wang, 2020. "An environmental perspective extends market orientation: Green innovation sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3123-3134, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10781-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.