IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/atlecj/v31y2003i3p283-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

William E. Simon's capacities' approach to liberty: An essay in economic citizenship

Author

Listed:
  • Ute Schumacher
  • Gladstone Hutchinson

Abstract

This paper discusses the philosophical underpinnings of William E. Simon's productive public service and his championing of liberty in economic citizenship and the furtherance of entrepreneurial capitalism in America. The discussion suggests that his understanding and advocacy of the instrumental role of liberty made him distinctive among policymakers and unique among political and social conservatives. Two central themes are highlighted: the principle of liberty and private initiatives to further the cause of liberty. Secretary Simon was a passionate advocate for individual liberty being ascribed the highest value in American political life and called for vigilance against the unnecessary intervention of the state in people's lives. He committed his intellectual and financial resources to the promotion of these ideals through significant initiatives in support of institutions including universities and colleges, foundations and community organizations, and groups that exhibited a strong belief in, and support of, the cause of liberty. This, Secretary Simon believed, would “strengthen the free enterprise system and the spiritual values on which it rests.” “The overriding principle to be revived in American political life is that which sets individual liberty as the highest political value—that value to which all other values are subordinate and that which, at all times, is to be given the highest priority in policy discussions.” William E. Simon A Time for Truth, 1978, p. 218. Copyright International Atlantic Economic Society 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Ute Schumacher & Gladstone Hutchinson, 2003. "William E. Simon's capacities' approach to liberty: An essay in economic citizenship," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 31(3), pages 283-288, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:31:y:2003:i:3:p:283-288
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02298821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02298821
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02298821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attiat F. Ott & Keith Hartley (ed.), 1991. "Privatization And Economic Efficiency," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 345.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bozec, Richard, 2004. "L’analyse comparative de la performance entre les entreprises publiques et les entreprises privées : le problème de mesure et son impact sur les résultats," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 80(4), pages 619-654, Décembre.
    2. Ai Tee Loh & Booi Hon Kam & John T. Jackson, 2003. "Sri Lanka's plantation sector: a before-and-after privatization comparison," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 727-745.
    3. E. Bruce Hutchinson & Leila J. Pratt, 2007. "Is Contracting Out Government Services the Great Panacea? Evidence from Public School Transportation in Louisiana," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 23(Fall 2007), pages 67-83.
    4. repec:eid:wpaper:20/09 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mohammed Omran, 2008. "The Performance of State-Owned Enterprises and Newly Privatized Firms: Does Privatization Really Matter?," Chapters, in: José María Fanelli & Lyn Squire (ed.), Economic Reform in Developing Countries, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Joaquim Vergés, 2000. "Privatisations in Spain: Process, Policies and Goals," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 255-280, May.
    7. Laarman, Jan G., 1995. "Government Policies Affecting Forests in Latin America: An Agenda for Discussion," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 6297, Inter-American Development Bank.
    8. Joaquim Vergés, 2001. "Why governments sell public firms: The Spanish case," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 7(1), pages 114-132, February.
    9. Mota, R.L., 2003. "The Restructuring and Privatisation of Electricity Distribution and Supply Business in Brazil: A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0309, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Kevin Cullinane & Dong-Wook Song, 2003. "A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of Korean container terminals," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 251-267.
    11. Boubakri, Narjess & Cosset, Jean-Claude, 1998. "La privatisation tient-elle ses promesses?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 74(3), pages 363-380, septembre.
    12. Jana Fidrmucova, 2000. "Channels of Restructuring in Privatized Czech Companies," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1358, Econometric Society.
    13. Bozec, Yves & Laurin, Claude, 2000. "L’impact de l’annonce de la privatisation sur la performance," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 76(2), pages 265-298, juin.
    14. Brooks, Mary R. & Cullinane, Kevin, 2006. "Chapter 26 Conclusions and Research Agenda," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 631-660, January.
    15. Fabrizio Erbetta, 2001. "Technology Transfer: Spatial Indicators," CERIS Working Paper 200111, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    16. Richard Bozec, 2005. "Boards of Directors, Market Discipline and Firm Performance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(9‐10), pages 1921-1960, November.
    17. Giovanni Fraquelli & Fabrizio Erbetta, 1999. "Privatization in Italy: an analysis of factors productivity and technical efficiency," CERIS Working Paper 199905, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    18. Villalonga, Belen, 2000. "Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 43-74, May.
    19. Janusz A. Ordover & Russell W. Pittman & Paul Clyde, 1994. "Competition policy for natural monopolies in a developing market economy1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 2(3), pages 317-343, September.
    20. R I F Naguib, 2009. "Institutional and Regulatory Frameworks of Privatisation and FDI: A Comparative Study between Egypt and Argentina," Department of Economics Working Papers 20/09, University of Bath, Department of Economics.
    21. Heinrich, Ralph P., 1993. "Microeconomic adjustment in Hungary: Results from a survey of enterprises," Kiel Working Papers 599, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:31:y:2003:i:3:p:283-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.