IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v15y2017i2d10.1007_s10308-017-0472-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The bear and the EU-China-US triangle: transatlantic and Russian influences on EU’s “pivot to Asia”

Author

Listed:
  • Bjørnar Sverdrup-Thygeson

    (Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI))

Abstract

This chapter argues that in the case of the EU’s efforts to undertake a “Pivot to Asia”, added explanatory salience can be achieved by recognising firstly the importance of the transatlantic factor and the US’ own rebalance policies. Secondly, based on a model where the USA is regarded as a significant variable in the EU-China relationship, one may more saliently discern the influence of Russia by assessing its impact on the triangular EU-China-US relationship, both directly and indirectly. Addressing these issues in European policymaking, the chapter will be constituted of two main parts. In the first section, the triangular nature of European foreign policies towards China is introduced, addressing the transatlantic factor in EU-China relations. Based on research on the European policy debates on EU’s Asia policies and the American Pivot to Asia, the section will illustrate the degree to which EU policy initiatives are conceived as playing out on a range from cooperation to competition with the US’ rebalance initiatives. In the second section, the chapter will proceed to investigate a factor that is affecting, although to different degrees, all three corners of the triangular political context in which European China policies are being shaped, namely the effects of recent Russian actions in the Eurasian theatre. The analysis demonstrates how European policymakers struggle to define their place in the EU-China-US triangle. The dynamics of the ongoing Asian power shift highlights the dilemmas for the European continent, as it seeks to balance its relations in a shifting geopolitical landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjørnar Sverdrup-Thygeson, 2017. "The bear and the EU-China-US triangle: transatlantic and Russian influences on EU’s “pivot to Asia”," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 161-172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0472-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-017-0472-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-017-0472-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-017-0472-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hemmer, Christopher & Katzenstein, Peter J., 2002. "Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(3), pages 575-607, July.
    2. Ikenberry, G. John & Kupchan, Charles A., 1990. "Socialization and hegemonic power," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 283-315, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Turner, 2019. "Subcontracting, facilitating and qualities of regional power: the UK’s partial pivot to Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 211-226, June.
    2. Thomas Christiansen & Richard Maher, 2017. "The rise of China—challenges and opportunities for the European Union," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-131, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scholvin, Sören, 2017. "Secondary Powers vis-à-vis South Africa: Hard Balancing, Soft Balancing, Rejection of Followership, and Disregard of Leadership," GIGA Working Papers 306, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    2. Druscilla Scribner & Tracy Slagter, 2017. "Recursive Norm Development: The Role of Supranational Courts," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 322-332, September.
    3. Craig N. Murphy, 2006. "Forum 2006," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 37(6), pages 1293-1307, November.
    4. Davis B. Bobrow & Mark A. Boyer, 1997. "Maintaining System Stability," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(6), pages 723-748, December.
    5. Gunitsky, Seva, 2014. "From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 561-597, July.
    6. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    7. Choi Eun-Mi, 2010. "Memory Politics and International Relations in East Asia," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 63-79, June.
    8. Giles Scott-Smith, 2008. "Mapping the Undefinable: Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Exchange Programs within International Relations Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 616(1), pages 173-195, March.
    9. Kadir Jun Ayhan, 2023. "Soft power is rare in world politics: Ruling out fear- and appetite-based compliance," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 476-486, December.
    10. Saori N. Katada, 2010. "Political Economy of East Asian Regional Integration and Cooperation," Working Papers id:3059, eSocialSciences.
    11. Steve Chan & Richard W. Hu, 2015. "East Asia’s Enduring Rivalries: Ripe for Abatement?," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 2(2), pages 133-153, August.
    12. Obert Hodzi, 2018. "Delegitimization and ‘Re-socialization’: China and the Diffusion of Alternative Norms in Africa," International Studies, , vol. 55(4), pages 297-314, October.
    13. Anja Jetschke, 2010. "Do Regional Organizations Travel? - European Integration, Diffusion and the Case of ASEAN," KFG Working Papers p0017, Free University Berlin.
    14. Jean-Frédéric Morin & Richard E. Gold, 2014. "An Integrated Model of Legal Transplantation: The Diffusion of Intellectual Property Law in Developing Countries," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/149496, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Lluc López i Vidal, 2022. "Beyond the Gaiatsu Model: Japan’s Asia-Pacific Policy and Neoclassical Realism," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 9(1), pages 26-49, April.
    16. Prys, Miriam, 2008. "Developing a Contextually Relevant Concept of Regional Hegemony: The Case of South Africa, Zimbabwe and "Quiet Diplomacy"," GIGA Working Papers 77, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    17. Nabers, Dirk, 2008. "China, Japan and the Quest for Leadership in East Asia," GIGA Working Papers 67, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    18. Michela Ceccorulli & Sonia Lucarelli, 2014. "Security Governance: making the concept fit for the analysis of a multipolar, global and regionalized world," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/41, European University Institute.
    19. Stephen, Matthew D., 2014. "Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 912-938.
    20. Nam-Kook Kim, 2009. "European experience for East Asian integration: ideas, national interests, and the international circumstance," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 295-312, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0472-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.