IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/jms111/v8y2017i4p47-50.html

Voluntary Assurance of Sustainability Report and Audit Fees

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Zhao

Abstract

The 21th century has seen huge changes of corporations. While companies¡¯ business grew rapidly, attention and recognition on corporate social responsibility has gradually been attracted and put on a vital strategy position. It has been proofed to be a crucial way that enterprises share their social responsibility actively in order to enhance their competitive advantage. With more and more enterprises knowing how important social responsibility is for their development, they released a new method which is called sustainability report to show them determine and confidence to take social responsibility. This thesis can be divided into six parts. The first part is about introduction and background. The second part is literature review. The third part is the development of hypotheses. The fourth part is research method and the fifth part is a conclusion. The last part is the reference.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Zhao, 2017. "Voluntary Assurance of Sustainability Report and Audit Fees," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(4), pages 47-50, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:8:y:2017:i:4:p:47-50
    DOI: 10.5430/jms.v8n4p47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/12103/7420
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/12103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/jms.v8n4p47?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacomo Manetti & Simone Toccafondi, 2012. "The Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability Reporting Assurance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 363-377, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    2. repec:ehu:cuader:55446 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Massimo Battaglia & Ilenia Ceglia & Mario Calabrese & Francesca Iandolo, 2025. "Systemic Risk Management and Stakeholder Engagement: Insights From Business CSR Disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 4295-4314, May.
    4. Warren Maroun, 2020. "A Conceptual Model for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 187-209, January.
    5. Krayyem Al‐Hajaya & Eba'a Amjed Almahameed & Nedal Sawan & Mohammad Saleh Altarawneh & Ahmed Eltweri & Rami Salem, 2025. "Audit Committees and the Quality of Standalone Sustainability Reporting, Considering the Moderating Role of External Assurance: Evidence From the Global Chemical Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 6210-6228, July.
    6. Sherine Jharni & Giulia Leoni, 2026. "Mapping 24 Years of Sustainability Reporting Assurance Research: A Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2837-2886, March.
    7. Cory Searcy & Ruvena Buslovich, 2014. "Corporate Perspectives on the Development and Use of Sustainability Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 149-169, May.
    8. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Yanyan Chen & Susannah M. Davis, 2019. "Deeds Not Words: A Cosmopolitan Perspective on the Influences of Corporate Sustainability and NGO Engagement on the Adoption of Sustainable Products in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 135-154, August.
    9. Tobias Gerwing & Peter Kajüter & Maximilian Wirth, 2022. "The role of sustainable corporate governance in mandatory sustainability reporting quality," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 517-555, April.
    10. Vincenzo Riso & Mouhcine Tallaki & Enrico Bracci & Silvia Cantele, 2024. "The transition towards benefit corporations: What are the roles for stakeholders?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 904-916, February.
    11. Melinda Timea FÜLÖP & Teodora Odett BREAZ & Gabriel RAITA & Alexandra Delia BUGNARIU, 2020. "More Confidence Of The Financial And Non-Financial Information With The Assurance Of Sustainability Reporting," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(22), pages 26-39.
    12. Ann Ho & Shireenjit Johl & Ingrid Millar & Robyn Cameron, 2026. "Sustainability Assurance Quality, Cost of Debt and Financial Constraints: Evidence From Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(1), pages 997-1023, March.
    13. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton & Julie Bernard, 2019. "Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1111-1125, November.
    14. José Luis Vázquez-Burguete & Oscar Licandro & Luis Camilo Ortigueira-Sánchez & Patricia Correa, 2024. "Do Enterprises That Publish Sustainability Reports Have a Better Developed Environmental Responsibility and Are They More Transparent?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Barry Ackers, 2017. "Independent corporate social responsibility assurance: a response to soft laws, or influenced by company size and industry sector?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(4), pages 278-298, November.
    16. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Zaman, Mahbub, 2016. "Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 210-222.
    17. Vincenzo Pacelli & Francesca Pampurini & Anna Grazia Quaranta, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Governance investing: Does rating matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 30-41, January.
    18. Katrin Hummel & Christian Schlick & Matthias Fifka, 2019. "The Role of Sustainability Performance and Accounting Assurors in Sustainability Assurance Engagements," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 733-757, February.
    19. Vaz Ogando, Natalia & Ruiz Blanco, Silvia & Fernandez-Feijoo Souto, Belen, 2018. "El mercado de verificación de las memorias de sostenibilidad en España: un análisis desde la perspectiva de la demanda," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 48-62.
    20. Arumega Zarefar & Dian Agustia & Noorlailie Soewarno, 2022. "Bridging the Gap between Sustainability Disclosure and Firm Performance in Indonesian Firms: The Moderating Effect of the Family Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    21. repec:ehu:cuader:49757 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. S. Prakash Sethi & Terrence F. Martell & Mert Demir, 2016. "Building Corporate Reputation Through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reports: The Case of Extractive Industries," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 219-243, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:8:y:2017:i:4:p:47-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jms.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.