Author
Listed:
- Massimo Battaglia
- Ilenia Ceglia
- Mario Calabrese
- Francesca Iandolo
Abstract
This study investigates corporate strategies for integrating non‐financial risks and stakeholder engagement into business management frameworks. Our inquiry analyzes the extent to which companies explicitly or implicitly incorporate stakeholder perspectives into their risk management practices. Based on the four fundamental pillars of risk management outlined by the Institute of Risk Management (IRM 2002), this study seeks to elucidate the multidimensional and comprehensive nature of stakeholder engagement in risk management processes. This study is based on a content analysis of 253 sustainability reports and Non‐Financial Statements drawn from different categories of companies representing the Italian market: large companies, small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs), cooperatives, and public utilities. The results reveal that companies primarily address risk management and control in their reports, aligning with the literature. Although risk components are equally important in managing adverse events, the results show a high percentage of risk analysis unlike what emerged from the literature, and a smaller percentage of companies focused on risk monitoring and risk communication. Stakeholder engagement levels vary based on company type and the activities performed in the risk governance process. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to systemic risk management research by integrating stakeholders into risk governance models. From a managerial perspective, this study offers implications for both risk management and sustainability disclosure practices. Limitations include the sample of Italian companies only and the different publication years of the collected reports.
Suggested Citation
Massimo Battaglia & Ilenia Ceglia & Mario Calabrese & Francesca Iandolo, 2025.
"Systemic Risk Management and Stakeholder Engagement: Insights From Business CSR Disclosure,"
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 4295-4314, May.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:4295-4314
DOI: 10.1002/csr.3186
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:4295-4314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.