IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/wpaper/y2018v10i2p167-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualization of economic security in the context of energy markets’ integration

Author

Listed:
  • Uliana BIHUN

    () (National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The research includes an analysis of the evolution of fundamental scientific theories regarding security. Based on the systematization of modern definitions the author suggests applying the institutional-transformational approach in order to comprehension the term “economic security of energy market”. The author emphasizes the influence of the theory of risk, the theory of conflict and theory of socio-economic catastrophes on the economic security of energy market. The author studies global trends in the development of the energy sector and determines the positions of Ukraine based on the indicators of the rating “Energy Trilemma Index” In the paper, the conceptual principles of economic security of energy markets, which these take into account peculiarities of integration processes, “acquis communautaire”, and stakeholders' interests, are presented. It gives the possibility to consider both economic and social-political factors of the market environment when establishing market priorities of every hierarchical level in a purpose of sustainable development achievement.

Suggested Citation

  • Uliana BIHUN, 2018. "Conceptualization of economic security in the context of energy markets’ integration," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10(2), pages 167-181, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2018:v:10:i:2:p:167-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2018_X2_BIH.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chester, Lynne, 2010. "Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 887-895, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2018:v:10:i:2:p:167-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alupului Ciprian). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.