IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2016-76-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Game Theory Model for Manipulation Based on Machiavellianism: Moral and Ethical Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Julio B. Clempner

Abstract

This paper presents a new game theory approach for modeling manipulation behavior based on Machiavellianism (social conduct and intelligence theory). The Machiavellian game conceptualizes the Machiavellianism considering three concepts: views, tactics and immorality. For modeling the Machiavellian views and tactics we employ a Stackelberg/Nash game theory approach. For representing the concept of immorality, we consider that rational Machiavellian players employ a combination of the deontological and utilitarian moral rules, as well as, moral heuristics. We employ a reinforcement learning approach for the implementation of the immorality concept providing a computational mechanism, in which, its principle of error-driven adjustment of cost/reward predictions contributes to the players' acquisition of moral (immoral) behavior. The reinforcement learning algorithm is based on an actor-critic approach responsible for evaluating the new state of the system and it determines if the cost/rewards are better or worse than expected, supported by the Machiavellian game theory solution. The result of the model is the manipulation equilibrium point. We provide the details needed to implement the extraproximal method in an efficient and numerically stable way. Finally, we present a numerical example that validates the effectiveness of the manipulation model.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio B. Clempner, 2017. "A Game Theory Model for Manipulation Based on Machiavellianism: Moral and Ethical Behavior," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2016-76-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jasss.org/20/2/12/12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia Schindler, 2012. "Rethinking the Tragedy of the Commons: The Integration of Socio-Psychological Dispositions," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(1), pages 1-4.
    2. Heinrich von Stackelberg, 2011. "Market Structure and Equilibrium," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-12586-7, December.
    3. Clempner, Julio B. & Poznyak, Alexander S., 2015. "Computing the strong Nash equilibrium for Markov chains games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 911-927.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clempner, Julio B., 2020. "Penalizing passenger’s transfer time in computing airlines revenue," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Jacqueline Sanchez-Rabaza & Jose Maria Rocha-Martinez & Julio B. Clempner, 2023. "Characterizing Manipulation via Machiavellianism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Julio B. Clempner, 2018. "Strategic Manipulation Approach for Solving Negotiated Transfer Pricing Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 304-316, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamilton, Stephen F. & Bontems, Philippe & Lepore, Jason, 2013. "Oligopoly Intermediation, Relative Rivalry, and the Mode of Competition," TSE Working Papers 13-466, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    2. Julien, Ludovic A., 2017. "On noncooperative oligopoly equilibrium in the multiple leader–follower game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 650-662.
    3. Ordoudis, Christos & Delikaraoglou, Stefanos & Kazempour, Jalal & Pinson, Pierre, 2020. "Market-based coordination of integrated electricity and natural gas systems under uncertain supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1105-1119.
    4. Kicsiny, R. & Varga, Z. & Scarelli, A., 2014. "Backward induction algorithm for a class of closed-loop Stackelberg games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1021-1036.
    5. Marek Mikolaj Kaminski, 2019. "Generalized Backward Induction: Justification for a Folk Algorithm," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Patricia Yañez-Pagans & Daniel Martinez & Oscar A. Mitnik & Lynn Scholl & Antonia Vazquez, 2019. "Urban transport systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: lessons and challenges," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Elsenbroich, Corinna & Payette, Nicolas, 2020. "Choosing to cooperate: Modelling public goods games with team reasoning," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    8. Li, Xin & Lian, Zhaotong & Choong, Kwee Keong & Liu, Xiaoming, 2016. "A quantity-flexibility contract with coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 273-284.
    9. Genc, Talat S. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2020. "Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 440-456.
    10. Francesco Caruso & Maria Carmela Ceparano & Jacqueline Morgan, 2021. "A Local Variation Method for Bilevel Nash Equilibrium Problems," CSEF Working Papers 620, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    11. Francesco Caruso & M. Beatrice Lignola & Jacqueline Morgan, 2020. "Regularization and Approximation Methods in Stackelberg Games and Bilevel Optimization," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Stephan Dempe & Alain Zemkoho (ed.), Bilevel Optimization, chapter 0, pages 77-138, Springer.
    12. Yifen Mu, 2014. "Inverse Stackelberg Public Goods Game with Multiple Hierarchies Under Global and Local Information Structures," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 332-350, October.
    13. Henrik Egbert & Teodor Sedlarski & Aleksandar B. Todorov, 2021. "Foundations of contemporary economics: Heinrich von Stackelberg on market structure," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 107-124.
    14. Julio B. Clempner, 2021. "A Proximal/Gradient Approach for Computing the Nash Equilibrium in Controllable Markov Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 847-862, March.
    15. Aditya Jain & Milind Sohoni, 2015. "Should firms conceal information when dealing with common suppliers?," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(1), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Dengke Yu & Rong Zhou, 2017. "Coordination of Cooperative Knowledge Creation for Agricultural Technology Diffusion in China’s “Company Plus Farmers” Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Liu, Xiaotong & Zhang, Kai & Chen, Bokui & Zhou, Jun & Miao, Lixin, 2018. "Analysis of logistics service supply chain for the One Belt and One Road initiative of China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 23-39.
    18. Zhu, Lijing & Zhang, Qi & Lu, Huihui & Li, Hailong & Li, Yan & McLellan, Benjamin & Pan, Xunzhang, 2017. "Study on crowdfunding’s promoting effect on the expansion of electric vehicle charging piles based on game theory analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 238-248.
    19. Leenders, Ludger & Bahl, Björn & Hennen, Maike & Bardow, André, 2019. "Coordinating scheduling of production and utility system using a Stackelberg game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1283-1295.
    20. Davide Secchi & Raffaello Seri, 2017. "Controlling for false negatives in agent-based models: a review of power analysis in organizational research," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 94-121, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2016-76-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Renzini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.