IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isv/jouijm/v1y2012i2p217-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Deviant Behaviour in the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela de Carvalho Wilks

    (Universidade Portucalense, Portugal)

Abstract

Employee misconduct in the workplace is relatively common and may be counterproductive in social and material terms. To identify which undesirable behaviours are considered acceptable is the first step to develop ways to reduce deviance in organizational settings. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceived acceptability of deviant behaviour in the workplace, and to analyse the relation between the degree of such acceptance with organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and organizational tenure. Data was obtained from 223 adults employed full-time. Results suggest a positive relationship between the degree of acceptability of certain forms of deviant behaviour and organizational commitment, but not with job satisfaction. They further indicate that tenure was the factor having the most impact on the acceptance of deviant behaviours. Implications of the findings for the management are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela de Carvalho Wilks, 2012. "Perceptions of Deviant Behaviour in the Workplace," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 1(2), pages 217-230.
  • Handle: RePEc:isv:jouijm:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:217-230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.issbs.si/press/ISSN/2232-5697/1_217-230.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland Kidwell & Sean Valentine, 2009. "Positive Group Context, Work Attitudes, and Organizational Misbehavior: The Case of Withholding Job Effort," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 15-28, April.
    2. Randi Sims, 2010. "A Study of Deviance as a Retaliatory Response to Organizational Power," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 553-563, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isv:jouijm:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:217-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alen JeĹžovnik). General contact details of provider: http://www.issbs.si .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.