IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v40y2006i2p226-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Archetti

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Brescia, C. da S. Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy)

  • Martin W. P. Savelsbergh

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0205)

  • M. Grazia Speranza

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Brescia, C. da S. Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy)

Abstract

In the vehicle routing problem (VRP) the objective is to construct a minimum cost set of routes serving all customers where the demand of each customer is less than or equal to the vehicle capacity and where each customer is visited once. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP) the restriction that each customer is visited once is removed. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing split deliveries is at most 50%. We also study the variant of the VRP in which the demand of a customer may be larger than the vehicle capacity, but where each customer has to be visited a minimum number of times. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing more than the minimum number of required visits is again at most 50%. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of simple heuristics that handle customers with demands larger than the vehicle capacity by employing full load out-and-back trips to these customers until the demands become less than or equal to the vehicle capacity. Finally, we investigate situations in which demands are discrete and vehicle capacities are small.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Archetti & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & M. Grazia Speranza, 2006. "Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 226-234, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:226-234
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1050.0117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1050.0117
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.1050.0117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moshe Dror & Pierre Trudeau, 1989. "Savings by Split Delivery Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 141-145, May.
    2. J. M. Belenguer & M. C. Martinez & E. Mota, 2000. "A Lower Bound for the Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 801-810, October.
    3. Olli Bräysy & Michel Gendreau, 2005. "Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows, Part II: Metaheuristics," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 119-139, February.
    4. Gerard Sierksma & Gert Tijssen, 1998. "Routing helicopters for crew exchanges on off-shore locations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 76(0), pages 261-286, January.
    5. C. Archetti & R. Mansini & M. G. Speranza, 2005. "Complexity and Reducibility of the Skip Delivery Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 182-187, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey W. Ohlmann & Michael J. Fry & Barrett W. Thomas, 2008. "Route Design for Lean Production Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 352-370, August.
    2. Claudia Archetti & M. Grazia Speranza & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2008. "An Optimization-Based Heuristic for the Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 22-31, February.
    3. C. Archetti & M. G. Speranza & A. Hertz, 2006. "A Tabu Search Algorithm for the Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 64-73, February.
    4. Saman Eskandarzadeh & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Amir Azaron, 2009. "An extension of the relaxation algorithm for solving a special case of capacitated arc routing problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 214-234, February.
    5. Jin, Mingzhou & Liu, Kai & Bowden, Royce O., 2007. "A two-stage algorithm with valid inequalities for the split delivery vehicle routing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 228-242, January.
    6. Gizem Ozbaygin & Oya Karasan & Hande Yaman, 2018. "New exact solution approaches for the split delivery vehicle routing problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 85-115, March.
    7. Alberto Ceselli & Giovanni Righini & Matteo Salani, 2009. "A Column Generation Algorithm for a Rich Vehicle-Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 56-69, February.
    8. José-Manuel Belenguer & Enrique Benavent & Nacima Labadi & Christian Prins & Mohamed Reghioui, 2010. "Split-Delivery Capacitated Arc-Routing Problem: Lower Bound and Metaheuristic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 206-220, May.
    9. U Derigs & B Li & U Vogel, 2010. "Local search-based metaheuristics for the split delivery vehicle routing problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(9), pages 1356-1364, September.
    10. Hertz, Alain & Uldry, Marc & Widmer, Marino, 2012. "Integer linear programming models for a cement delivery problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 623-631.
    11. Guy Desaulniers, 2010. "Branch-and-Price-and-Cut for the Split-Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 179-192, February.
    12. C. Archetti & M. Bouchard & G. Desaulniers, 2011. "Enhanced Branch and Price and Cut for Vehicle Routing with Split Deliveries and Time Windows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 285-298, August.
    13. Leonardo Berbotto & Sergio García & Francisco Nogales, 2014. "A Randomized Granular Tabu Search heuristic for the split delivery vehicle routing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 153-173, November.
    14. Chen, Qingfeng & Li, Kunpeng & Liu, Zhixue, 2014. "Model and algorithm for an unpaired pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem with split loads," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 218-235.
    15. Bortfeldt, Andreas & Yi, Junmin, 2020. "The Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem with three-dimensional loading constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 545-558.
    16. Nowak, Maciek & Ergun, Ozlem & White III, Chelsea C., 2009. "An empirical study on the benefit of split loads with the pickup and delivery problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 734-740, November.
    17. Yu, Mingzhu & Jin, Xin & Zhang, Zizhen & Qin, Hu & Lai, Qidong, 2019. "The split-delivery mixed capacitated arc-routing problem: Applications and a forest-based tabu search approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 141-162.
    18. Nicola Bianchessi & Stefan Irnich, 2019. "Branch-and-Cut for the Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 442-462, March.
    19. Yu, Yugang & Chen, Haoxun & Chu, Feng, 2008. "A new model and hybrid approach for large scale inventory routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1022-1040, September.
    20. Lin, Yen-Hung & Batta, Rajan & Rogerson, Peter A. & Blatt, Alan & Flanigan, Marie, 2011. "A logistics model for emergency supply of critical items in the aftermath of a disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 132-145, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:226-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.