IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v73y2025i2p648-663.html

Generalization Guarantees for Multi-Item Profit Maximization: Pricing, Auctions, and Randomized Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Maria-Florina Balcan

    (School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • Tuomas Sandholm

    (School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; and Optimized Markets, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; and Strategic Machine, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; and Strategy Robot, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • Ellen Vitercik

    (Management Science and Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304; and Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304)

Abstract

We study multi-item profit maximization when there is an underlying distribution over buyers’ values. In practice, a full description of the distribution is typically unavailable, so we study the setting where the mechanism designer only has samples from the distribution. If the designer uses the samples to optimize over a complex mechanism class—such as the set of all multi-item, multibuyer mechanisms—a mechanism may have high average profit over the samples, but low expected profit. This raises the central question of this paper: How many samples are sufficient to ensure that a mechanism’s average profit is close to its expected profit? To answer this question, we uncover structure shared by many pricing, auction, and lottery mechanisms: For any set of buyers’ values, profit is piecewise linear in the mechanism’s parameters. Using this structure, we prove new bounds for mechanism classes not yet studied in the sample-based mechanism design literature and match or improve over the best-known guarantees for many classes. Finally, we provide tools for optimizing an important tradeoff: More complex mechanisms typically have higher average profit over the samples than simpler mechanisms, but more samples are required to ensure that average profit nearly matches expected profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria-Florina Balcan & Tuomas Sandholm & Ellen Vitercik, 2025. "Generalization Guarantees for Multi-Item Profit Maximization: Pricing, Auctions, and Randomized Mechanisms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(2), pages 648-663, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:2:p:648-663
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.0026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.0026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.0026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor F. Araman & René Caldentey, 2009. "Dynamic Pricing for Nonperishable Products with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1169-1188, October.
    2. Benjamin Edelman & Michael Ostrovsky & Michael Schwarz, 2007. "Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second-Price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars Worth of Keywords," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(1), pages 242-259, March.
    3. Jehiel, Philippe & Meyer-ter-Vehn, Moritz & Moldovanu, Benny, 2007. "Mixed bundling auctions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 494-512, May.
    4. Alon Eden & Michal Feldman & Ophir Friedler & Inbal Talgam-Cohen & S. Matthew Weinberg, 2021. "A Simple and Approximately Optimal Mechanism for a Buyer with Complements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 188-206, January.
    5. Walter Y. Oi, 1971. "A Disneyland Dilemma: Two-Part Tariffs for a Mickey Mouse Monopoly," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 85(1), pages 77-96.
    6. Josef Broder & Paat Rusmevichientong, 2012. "Dynamic Pricing Under a General Parametric Choice Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 965-980, August.
    7. Roger B. Myerson, 1981. "Optimal Auction Design," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 58-73, February.
    8. Martin S. Feldstein, 1972. "Equity and Efficiency in Public Sector Pricing: The Optimal Two-Part Tariff," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 86(2), pages 175-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siddharth Prasad & Maria-Florina Balcan & Tuomas Sandholm, 2025. "Revenue-Optimal Efficient Mechanism Design with General Type Spaces," Papers 2505.13687, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillermo Gallego & Michael Z. F. Li & Yan Liu, 2020. "Dynamic Nonlinear Pricing of Inventories over Finite Sales Horizons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 655-670, May.
    2. Yang, Wei & Xiao, Baichun & Wu, Lifang, 2020. "Learning and pricing models for repeated generalized second-price auction in search advertising," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 696-711.
    3. Hamid Nazerzadeh & Amin Saberi & Rakesh Vohra, 2013. "Dynamic Pay-Per-Action Mechanisms and Applications to Online Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 98-111, February.
    4. Ilan Lobel, 2021. "Revenue Management and the Rise of the Algorithmic Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5389-5398, September.
    5. Negin Golrezaei & Adel Javanmard & Vahab Mirrokni, 2021. "Dynamic Incentive-Aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 297-314, January.
    6. Siddharth Prasad & Maria-Florina Balcan & Tuomas Sandholm, 2025. "Revenue-Optimal Efficient Mechanism Design with General Type Spaces," Papers 2505.13687, arXiv.org.
    7. Wei He & Jiangtao Li & Weijie Zhong, 2024. "Rank-Guaranteed Auctions," Papers 2408.12001, arXiv.org.
    8. Frank Kelly & Peter Key & Neil Walton, 2016. "Efficient Advert Assignment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 822-837, August.
    9. Ming Chen & Sareh Nabi & Marciano Siniscalchi, 2023. "Advancing Ad Auction Realism: Practical Insights & Modeling Implications," Papers 2307.11732, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    10. Xiao, Baichun & Yang, Wei, 2021. "A Bayesian learning model for estimating unknown demand parameter in revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 248-262.
    11. Ying-Ju Chen, 2017. "Optimal Dynamic Auctions for Display Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 897-913, August.
    12. Mahsa Derakhshan & Negin Golrezaei & Renato Paes Leme, 2022. "Linear Program-Based Approximation for Personalized Reserve Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1849-1864, March.
    13. Jehiel, Philippe & Lamy, Laurent, 2014. "On discrimination in procurement auctions," CEPR Discussion Papers 9790, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    14. Hao Zhang, 2022. "Dynamic Learning and Decision Making via Basis Weight Vectors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1835-1853, May.
    15. Hamsa Bastani & David Simchi-Levi & Ruihao Zhu, 2022. "Meta Dynamic Pricing: Transfer Learning Across Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1865-1881, March.
    16. Philippe Jehiel & Laurent Lamy, 2020. "On the Benefits of Set-Asides," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1655-1696.
    17. Qi (George) Chen & Stefanus Jasin & Izak Duenyas, 2021. "Technical Note—Joint Learning and Optimization of Multi-Product Pricing with Finite Resource Capacity and Unknown Demand Parameters," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 560-573, March.
    18. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao & Cong Shi, 2021. "Nonparametric Learning Algorithms for Joint Pricing and Inventory Control with Lost Sales and Censored Demand," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 726-756, May.
    19. Sameer Mehta & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2020. "Sustaining a Good Impression: Mechanisms for Selling Partitioned Impressions at Ad Exchanges," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 126-147, March.
    20. Xiaocheng Li & Zeyu Zheng, 2024. "Dynamic Pricing with External Information and Inventory Constraint," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5985-6001, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:2:p:648-663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.