IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v65y2017i2p537-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Call Center Staffing: Service-Level Constraints and Index Priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Bum Soh

    (College of Business Administration, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea)

  • Itai Gurvich

    (School of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Cornell Tech, New York, New York 10011)

Abstract

Call centers attribute different values to different customer segments. These values are reflected in quality-of-service targets. The prevalent target service factor (TSF) formulation requires, for example, that 80% of VIP customers wait less than 20 seconds while setting the target to 30 seconds for non-VIP customers. The call center must determine the staffing level together with a prioritization rule that meets these targets at minimal cost. In practice, because of the underlying complexity of these systems, the prioritization rule is often selected in a heuristic manner rather than being systematically optimized. When considering the universe of prioritization policies, index rules provide a customizable and easy to define heuristic and for this reason are implemented in various call center software packages. We use the TSF formulation as a stepping stone toward a better understanding of index rules. We first construct an asymptotically optimal solution for the TSF problem. The prioritization component of our solution is a tracking policy rather than an index rule. We prove that despite index rules’ significant flexibility, no instance of these prioritization rules is optimal for the TSF problem. The suboptimality of index rules follows from an essential characteristic of these: restricting attention to index rules (as is heuristically done in practice) is asymptotically equivalent to requiring that a VIP customer always waits less than a regular (non-VIP) customer who arrives at the same time. This, in particular, implies that the use of index rules in practice can be rationalized if (and only if) the manager requires such strong differentiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Bum Soh & Itai Gurvich, 2017. "Call Center Staffing: Service-Level Constraints and Index Priorities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 537-555, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:65:y:2017:i:2:p:537-555
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2016.1532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1532
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2016.1532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itai Gurvich & Ward Whitt, 2010. "Service-Level Differentiation in Many-Server Service Systems via Queue-Ratio Routing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 316-328, April.
    2. Mor Armony & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2011. "Routing and Staffing in Large-Scale Service Systems: The Case of Homogeneous Impatient Customers and Heterogeneous Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 50-65, February.
    3. Avishai Mandelbaum & Alexander L. Stolyar, 2004. "Scheduling Flexible Servers with Convex Delay Costs: Heavy-Traffic Optimality of the Generalized cμ-Rule," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 836-855, December.
    4. Wyean Chan & Ger Koole & Pierre L'Ecuyer, 2014. "Dynamic Call Center Routing Policies Using Call Waiting and Agent Idle Times," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 544-560, October.
    5. Itay Gurvich & Mor Armony & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2008. "Service-Level Differentiation in Call Centers with Fully Flexible Servers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 279-294, February.
    6. Shlomo Halfin & Ward Whitt, 1981. "Heavy-Traffic Limits for Queues with Many Exponential Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 567-588, June.
    7. Sem Borst & Avi Mandelbaum & Martin I. Reiman, 2004. "Dimensioning Large Call Centers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 17-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noa Zychlinski, 2023. "Applications of fluid models in service operations management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 161-185, February.
    2. Amy R. Ward & Mor Armony, 2013. "Blind Fair Routing in Large-Scale Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers and Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 228-243, February.
    3. Merve Bodur & James R. Luedtke, 2017. "Mixed-Integer Rounding Enhanced Benders Decomposition for Multiclass Service-System Staffing and Scheduling with Arrival Rate Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2073-2091, July.
    4. Vijay Mehrotra & Kevin Ross & Geoff Ryder & Yong-Pin Zhou, 2012. "Routing to Manage Resolution and Waiting Time in Call Centers with Heterogeneous Servers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 66-81, January.
    5. Tolga Tezcan & J. G. Dai, 2010. "Dynamic Control of N -Systems with Many Servers: Asymptotic Optimality of a Static Priority Policy in Heavy Traffic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 94-110, February.
    6. Itai Gurvich & Ward Whitt, 2010. "Service-Level Differentiation in Many-Server Service Systems via Queue-Ratio Routing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 316-328, April.
    7. Mor Armony & Amy R. Ward, 2010. "Fair Dynamic Routing in Large-Scale Heterogeneous-Server Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 624-637, June.
    8. Jeunghyun Kim & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Amy R. Ward, 2018. "Dynamic Scheduling in a Many-Server, Multiclass System: The Role of Customer Impatience in Large Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 285-301, May.
    9. Achal Bassamboo & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Assaf Zeevi, 2010. "Capacity Sizing Under Parameter Uncertainty: Safety Staffing Principles Revisited," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1668-1686, October.
    10. Jinsheng Chen & Jing Dong & Pengyi Shi, 2020. "A survey on skill-based routing with applications to service operations management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 53-82, October.
    11. Achal Bassamboo & Assaf Zeevi, 2009. "On a Data-Driven Method for Staffing Large Call Centers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 714-726, June.
    12. J. G. Dai & Tolga Tezcan, 2011. "State Space Collapse in Many-Server Diffusion Limits of Parallel Server Systems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 271-320, May.
    13. Sunil Kumar & Ramandeep S. Randhawa, 2010. "Exploiting Market Size in Service Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 511-526, September.
    14. Zhenghua Long & Nahum Shimkin & Hailun Zhang & Jiheng Zhang, 2020. "Dynamic Scheduling of Multiclass Many-Server Queues with Abandonment: The Generalized cμ / h Rule," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1128-1230, July.
    15. Itay Gurvich & Ward Whitt, 2009. "Scheduling Flexible Servers with Convex Delay Costs in Many-Server Service Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 237-253, June.
    16. Carri W. Chan & Linda V. Green & Suparerk Lekwijit & Lijian Lu & Gabriel Escobar, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Service Level When Customer Needs Are Uncertain: An Empirical Investigation of Hospital Step-Down Units," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 751-775, February.
    17. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović, 2008. "Queues with Many Servers: The Virtual Waiting-Time Process in the QED Regime," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 561-586, August.
    18. Xiaojun Liang & Yinghui Tang, 2019. "The improvement upon the reliability of the k-out-of-n:F system with the repair rates differentiation policy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 479-500, June.
    19. Ying Xu & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Katia Sycara, 2015. "The Benefit of Introducing Variability in Single-Server Queues with Application to Quality-Based Service Domains," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 233-246, February.
    20. Tolga Tezcan, 2008. "Optimal Control of Distributed Parallel Server Systems Under the Halfin and Whitt Regime," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 51-90, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:65:y:2017:i:2:p:537-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.