IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v62y2014i2p418-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fabrication-Adaptive Optimization with an Application to Photonic Crystal Design

Author

Listed:
  • Han Men

    (Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Robert M. Freund

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Ngoc C. Nguyen

    (Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Joel Saa-Seoane

    (Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Jaime Peraire

    (Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

It is often the case that the computed optimal solution of an optimization problem cannot be implemented directly, irrespective of data accuracy, because of either (i) technological limitations (such as physical tolerances of machines or processes), (ii) the deliberate simplification of a model to keep it tractable (by ignoring certain types of constraints that pose computational difficulties), and/or (iii) human factors (getting people to “do” the optimal solution). Motivated by this observation, we present a modeling paradigm called “fabrication-adaptive optimization” for treating issues of implementation/fabrication. We develop computationally focused theory and algorithms, and we present computational results for incorporating considerations of implementation/fabrication into constrained optimization problems that arise in photonic crystal design. The fabrication-adaptive optimization framework stems from the robust regularization of a function. When the feasible region is not a normed space (as typically encountered in application settings), the fabrication-adaptive optimization framework typically yields a nonconvex optimization problem. (In the special case where the feasible region is a finite-dimensional normed space, we show that fabrication-adaptive optimization can be recast as an instance of modern robust optimization.) We study a variety of problems with special structures on functions, feasible regions, and norms for which computation is tractable and develop an algorithmic scheme for solving these problems in spite of the challenges of nonconvexity. We apply our methodology to compute fabrication-adaptive designs of two-dimensional photonic crystals with a variety of prescribed features.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Men & Robert M. Freund & Ngoc C. Nguyen & Joel Saa-Seoane & Jaime Peraire, 2014. "Fabrication-Adaptive Optimization with an Application to Photonic Crystal Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 418-434, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:62:y:2014:i:2:p:418-434
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2013.1252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2013.1252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stinstra, Erwin & den Hertog, Dick, 2008. "Robust optimization using computer experiments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 816-837, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriele Eichfelder & Corinna Krüger & Anita Schöbel, 2017. "Decision uncertainty in multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 485-510, October.
    2. Ben-Tal, A. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Immunizing Conic Quadratic Optimization Problems Against Implementation Errors," Discussion Paper 2011-060, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Richard D F Harris & Evarist Stoja & Linzhi Tan, 2016. "The dynamic Black-Litterman approach to asset allocation," Bank of England working papers 596, Bank of England.
    4. Fajemisin, Adejuyigbe O. & Maragno, Donato & den Hertog, Dick, 2024. "Optimization with constraint learning: A framework and survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 1-14.
    5. Huang, Dashan & Zhu, Shushang & Fabozzi, Frank J. & Fukushima, Masao, 2010. "Portfolio selection under distributional uncertainty: A relative robust CVaR approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 185-194, May.
    6. Siem, A.Y.D., 2008. "Property preservation and quality measures in meta-models," Other publications TiSEM 259d3ed2-1a23-48fe-8af8-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Dimitris Bertsimas & Omid Nohadani & Kwong Meng Teo, 2010. "Robust Optimization for Unconstrained Simulation-Based Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 161-178, February.
    8. Ben-Tal, A. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Immunizing Conic Quadratic Optimization Problems Against Implementation Errors," Other publications TiSEM 9f3fba48-8501-4ec8-9241-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Dellino, G. & Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Meloni, C., 2009. "Robust Optimization in Simulation : Taguchi and Krige Combined," Other publications TiSEM d919b893-db2b-4d97-a392-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Ouyang, Linhan & Ma, Yizhong & Wang, Jianjun & Tu, Yiliu, 2017. "A new loss function for multi-response optimization with model parameter uncertainty and implementation errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 552-563.
    11. Koubaa, Rayhane & Bacha, Seddik & Smaoui, Mariem & krichen, Lotfi, 2020. "Robust optimization based energy management of a fuel cell/ultra-capacitor hybrid electric vehicle under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Siem, A.Y.D. & den Hertog, D., 2007. "Kriging Models That Are Robust With Respect to Simulation Errors," Discussion Paper 2007-68, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Harris, Richard D.F. & Stoja, Evarist & Tan, Linzhi, 2017. "The dynamic Black–Litterman approach to asset allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1085-1096.
    14. Gabriella Dellino & Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Carlo Meloni, 2012. "Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Krige Combined," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 471-484, August.
    15. He, Zhen & Zhu, Peng-Fei & Park, Sung-Hyun, 2012. "A robust desirability function method for multi-response surface optimization considering model uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 241-247.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:62:y:2014:i:2:p:418-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.