IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v26y2024i3p893-910.html

Elective Surgery Sequencing and Scheduling Under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojin Fu

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Decision Analytics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China)

  • Jin Qi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Decision Analytics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China)

  • Chen Yang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Decision Analytics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China)

  • Han Ye

    (Decision and Technology Analytics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015)

Abstract

Problem definition : We consider a surgery sequencing and scheduling problem with uncertain durations of surgeries in the context of an operating theater. From real data collected from a hospital, we observe the common practice, namely, “to follow,” in which surgeries are conducted sequentially and immediately one after another, according to a specific schedule. Methodology/results : Based on this practice, we propose a mathematical framework to balance the risk of delay and idling using the punctuality index, which takes into consideration both the probability and intensity of delay and idle time. We develop a computationally efficient procedure based on Benders decomposition to derive exact solutions for the problem. The scheduling problem is solvable in polynomial time when the sequence is given. The framework can also accommodate a robust setting when the underlying probability distribution is not fully available. For practical use, we propose two effective heuristics for sequencing decisions by approximating the model. Using real data, we demonstrate that our framework is significantly better than the risk-neutral and probability-maximizing approaches in both performance and computational efficiency. Moreover, the robust setting can effectively lessen the risk of extremely long delay and idle time, and the heuristics are efficient with only a small sacrifice of performance. Managerial implications : With the to-follow policy, our sequencing and scheduling model describes the actual practice better. The two heuristics can be applied easily and directly to help managers of operating theaters to make decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojin Fu & Jin Qi & Chen Yang & Han Ye, 2024. "Elective Surgery Sequencing and Scheduling Under Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 893-910, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:3:p:893-910
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Qi, 2017. "Mitigating Delays and Unfairness in Appointment Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 566-583, February.
    2. Wang, P. Patrick, 1999. "Sequencing and scheduling N customers for a stochastic server," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 729-738, December.
    3. Qingxia Kong & Chung-Yee Lee & Chung-Piaw Teo & Zhichao Zheng, 2013. "Scheduling Arrivals to a Stochastic Service Delivery System Using Copositive Cones," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 711-726, June.
    4. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    5. Andreas Fügener & Sebastian Schiffels & Rainer Kolisch, 2017. "Overutilization and underutilization of operating rooms - insights from behavioral health care operations management," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 115-128, March.
    6. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    7. Robert J. Aumann & Roberto Serrano, 2008. "An Economic Index of Riskiness," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 810-836, October.
    8. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Cohn, Amy E.M. & Epelman, Marina A., 2019. "Analysis of models for the Stochastic Outpatient Procedure Scheduling Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 721-731.
    9. Kong, Qingxia & Lee, Chung-Yee & Teo, Chung-Piaw & Zheng, Zhichao, 2016. "Appointment sequencing: Why the Smallest-Variance-First rule may not be optimal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 809-821.
    10. Wouter van Eekelen & Dick den Hertog & Johan S.H. van Leeuwaarden, 2022. "MAD Dispersion Measure Makes Extremal Queue Analysis Simple," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1681-1692, May.
    11. Brian T. Denton & Andrew J. Miller & Hari J. Balasubramanian & Todd R. Huschka, 2010. "Optimal Allocation of Surgery Blocks to Operating Rooms Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 802-816, August.
    12. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Cohn, Amy E.M. & Jiang, Ruiwei, 2020. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for outpatient colonoscopy scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 549-561.
    13. Xin Chen & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Jin Qi, 2021. "Preservation of Supermodularity in Parametric Optimization: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions on Constraint Structures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Harish Guda & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Kyung Sung Jung, 2016. "Optimal Policy for a Stochastic Scheduling Problem with Applications to Surgical Scheduling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(7), pages 1194-1202, July.
    15. Patrick Jaillet & Jin Qi & Melvyn Sim, 2016. "Routing Optimization Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 186-200, February.
    16. Shubhechyya Ghosal & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2020. "The Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Vehicle Routing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 716-732, May.
    17. Antonio J. Conejo & Nicholas G. Hall & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Runhao Zhang, 2021. "Robust Capacity Planning for Project Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1533-1550, October.
    18. Basciftci, Beste & Ahmed, Shabbir & Shen, Siqian, 2021. "Distributionally robust facility location problem under decision-dependent stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 548-561.
    19. Brian Denton & James Viapiano & Andrea Vogl, 2007. "Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 13-24, February.
    20. Zheng Cui & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Jin Qi & Lianmin Zhang, 2023. "The Inventory Routing Problem Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 378-395, January.
    21. Nickolas K. Freeman & Sharif H. Melouk & John Mittenthal, 2016. "A Scenario-Based Approach for Operating Theater Scheduling Under Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 245-261, May.
    22. J. Essen & Johann Hurink & Woutske Hartholt & Bernd Akker, 2012. "Decision support system for the operating room rescheduling problem," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 355-372, December.
    23. Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
    24. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Sun, 2007. "A Robust Optimization Perspective on Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1058-1071, December.
    25. Baker, Kenneth R., 2014. "Minimizing earliness and tardiness costs in stochastic scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 445-452.
    26. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boonstra, Guus & van Eekelen, Wouter J. E. C. & van Leeuwaarden, Johan S. H., 2025. "Robust knapsack ordering for a partially-informed newsvendor with budget constraint," Other publications TiSEM f8621c78-5367-4605-8158-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Man Yiu Tsang & Karmel S. Shehadeh & Frank E. Curtis & Beth R. Hochman & Tricia E. Brentjens, 2025. "Stochastic Optimization Approaches for an Operating Room and Anesthesiologist Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1430-1458, May.
    2. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    3. Md Al Amin & Roberto Baldacci & Vahid Kayvanfar, 2025. "A comprehensive review on operating room scheduling and optimization," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Yun Zhou & Mahmut Parlar & Vedat Verter & Shannon Fraser, 2021. "Surgical Scheduling with Constrained Patient Waiting Times," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3253-3271, September.
    5. Salma Makboul & Said Kharraja & Abderrahman Abbassi & Ahmed El Hilali Alaoui, 2022. "A two-stage robust optimization approach for the master surgical schedule problem under uncertainty considering downstream resources," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 63-88, March.
    6. Wu, Xueqi & Zhou, Shenghai, 2022. "Sequencing and scheduling appointments on multiple servers with stochastic service durations and customer arrivals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    7. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    8. Madelon A. de Kemp & Michel Mandjes & Neil Olver, 2021. "Performance of the Smallest-Variance-First Rule in Appointment Sequencing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 1909-1935, November.
    9. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Tsang, Man Yiu & Padman, Rema & Kilic, Arman, 2026. "Operating room-to-downstream elective surgery planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(1), pages 288-307.
    10. van Eekelen, Wouter, 2023. "Distributionally robust views on queues and related stochastic models," Other publications TiSEM 9b99fc05-9d68-48eb-ae8c-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Makboul, Salma & Olteanu, Alexandru-Liviu & Sevaux, Marc, 2025. "A multiobjective ϵ-constraint based approach for the robust master surgical schedule under multiple uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 682-698.
    12. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    13. Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Jin Qi & Aiqi Zhang, 2024. "Supermodularity in Two-Stage Distributionally Robust Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1394-1409, March.
    14. van Eekelen, Wouter & den Hertog, Dick & van Leeuwaarden, J.S.H., 2025. "Distributionally robust appointment scheduling that can deal with independent service times," Other publications TiSEM e6ac8cc7-43c6-42c6-9e11-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Bernardetta Addis & Giuliana Carello & Andrea Grosso & Elena Tànfani, 2016. "Operating room scheduling and rescheduling: a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 206-232, June.
    17. Weiwei Fan & L. Jeff Hong & Xiaowei Zhang, 2020. "Distributionally Robust Selection of the Best," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 190-208, January.
    18. Sagnol, Guillaume & Barner, Christoph & Borndörfer, Ralf & Grima, Mickaël & Seeling, Matthes & Spies, Claudia & Wernecke, Klaus, 2018. "Robust allocation of operating rooms: A cutting plane approach to handle lognormal case durations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 420-435.
    19. Shuming Wang & Jun Li & Marcus Ang & Tsan Sheng Ng, 2024. "Appointment Scheduling with Delay Tolerance Heterogeneity," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1201-1224, September.
    20. Gökalp, E. & Gülpınar, N. & Doan, X.V., 2023. "Dynamic surgery management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 832-844.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:3:p:893-910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.