IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i2p775-791.html

Off-Platform Threats in On-Demand Services

Author

Listed:
  • Eryn Juan He

    (David Eccles School of Business, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112)

  • Sergei Savin

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Joel Goh

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, NUS Business School, Singapore 119245; Global Asia Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119076; Institute of Operations Research and Analytics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

  • Chung-Piaw Teo

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, NUS Business School, Singapore 119245; Institute of Operations Research and Analytics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

Abstract

Problem definition : Online platforms that provide on-demand services are often threatened by the phenomenon of leakage , where customer-provider pairs may decide to transact “off-platform” to avoid paying commissions to the platform. This paper investigates properties of services that make them vulnerable or resistant to leakage. Academic/practical relevance: In practice, much attention has been given to platform leakage, with platforms experimenting with multiple approaches to alleviate leakage and maintain their customer and provider bases. Yet, there is a current dearth of studies in the operations literature that systematically analyze the key factors behind platform leakage. Our work fills this gap and answers practical questions regarding the sustainability of platform. Methodology : We develop two game-theoretical models that capture service providers’ and customers’ decisions whether to conduct transactions on or off the platform. In the first (“perfect information”) model, we assume that customers are equipped with information to select their desired providers on the platform, whereas in the second (“imperfect information”) model, we assume customers are randomly matched with available providers by the platform. Results : For profit maximizing platforms, we show that leakage occurs if and only if the value of the counterparty risk from off-platform transactions exceeds a threshold. Across both models, platforms tend to be more immunized against leakage as provider pool sizes increase, customer valuations for service increase, their waiting costs decrease, or variability in service times are reduced. Finally, by comparing the degree of leakage between both settings, we find that neither model dominates the other across all parameter combinations. Managerial implications : Our results provide guidance to existing platform managers or entrepreneurs who are considering “platforming” their services. Namely, based on a few key features of the operating environment, managers can assess the severity of the threat of platform leakage for their specific business context. Our results also suggest how redesigning the waiting process, reducing service time variability, upskilling providers can reduce the threat of leakage. They also suggest the conditions under which revealing provider quality information to customers can help to curb leakage.

Suggested Citation

  • Eryn Juan He & Sergei Savin & Joel Goh & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2023. "Off-Platform Threats in On-Demand Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 775-791, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:775-791
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1179
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    2. Jiaru Bai & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang & Xiqun (Michael) Chen & Hai Wang, 2019. "Coordinating Supply and Demand on an On-Demand Service Platform with Impatient Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 556-570, July.
    3. Terry A. Taylor, 2018. "On-Demand Service Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 704-720, October.
    4. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Managing Queueing Systems Where Capacity is Random and Customers are Impatient," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(2), pages 234-250, February.
    5. Saif Benjaafar & Ming Hu, 2020. "Operations Management in the Age of the Sharing Economy: What Is Old and What Is New?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 93-101, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yifan Xu & Jingyu Qi & Jiahao Kong & Weisi Zhang, 2024. "Strategic decision making in live streaming e-commerce through tripartite evolutionary game analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-32, July.
    2. Stephanie Nguyen & Daisy Bertrand & Sylvie Llosa & Mathieu Alemany Oliver, 2025. "Exploring Bypass Practices on Sharing Platforms: A Typology of Users Who Bypass and Those Who Don’t," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(2), pages 453-479, June.
    3. Christmann, Robin & Rösch, Jürgen, 2025. "Platforms, information asymmetry and leakage: why disintermediation may not hurt (so much) after all," MPRA Paper 126803, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Feng Tian & Ekaterina Astashkina & Izak Duenyas, 2025. "Dynamic Contract Design in the Presence of Double Moral Hazard," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 6475-6494, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming Hu, 2021. "From the Classics to New Tunes: A Neoclassical View on Sharing Economy and Innovative Marketplaces," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1668-1685, June.
    2. Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz & Catarina Pinto & Pedro Amorim, 2022. "Driving Supply to Marketplaces: Optimal Platform Pricing When Suppliers Share Inventory," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 2367-2386, July.
    3. Chen, Mingyang & Zhao, Daozhi & Gong, Yeming & Rekik, Yacine, 2022. "An on-demand service platform with self-scheduling capacity: Uniform versus multiplier-based pricing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Gad Allon & Maxime C. Cohen & Wichinpong Park Sinchaisri, 2023. "The Impact of Behavioral and Economic Drivers on Gig Economy Workers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1376-1393, July.
    5. Yang, Jie & Zhao, Daozhi & Wang, Zeyu & Xu, Chunqiu, 2022. "Impact of regulation on on-demand ride-sharing service: Profit-based target vs demand-based target," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Yunke Mai & Bin Hu & Saša Pekeč, 2023. "Courteous or Crude? Managing User Conduct to Improve On-Demand Service Platform Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 996-1016, February.
    7. De Munck, Thomas & Chevalier, Philippe & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2023. "Managing priorities on on-demand service platforms with waiting time differentiation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    8. Yanli Tang & Pengfei Guo & Christopher S. Tang & Yulan Wang, 2021. "Gender‐Related Operational Issues Arising from On‐Demand Ride‐Hailing Platforms: Safety Concerns and System Configuration," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3481-3496, October.
    9. Saif Benjaafar & Harald Bernhard & Costas Courcoubetis & Michail Kanakakis & Spyridon Papafragkos, 2022. "Drivers, Riders, and Service Providers: The Impact of the Sharing Economy on Mobility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 123-142, January.
    10. Ye, Fei & Ni, Debing & Li, Kevin W., 2021. "Competition between manufacturers and sharing economy platforms: An owner base and sharing utility perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Hu, Xinru & Zhou, Shuiyin & Luo, Xiaomeng & Li, Jianbin & Zhang, Chi, 2024. "Optimal pricing strategy of an on-demand platform with cross-regional passengers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Benioudakis, Myron & Zissis, Dimitris & Burnetas, Apostolos & Ioannou, George, 2023. "Service provision on an aggregator platform with time-sensitive customers: Pricing strategies and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    13. Chen Jin & Kartik Hosanagar & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2026. "Welfare Impact of Bilateral Rating Display in Ride-Sharing Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 610-623, March.
    14. Yixuan Liu & Xiaofang Wang & Stephen Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2023. "On the Participation, Competition and Welfare at Customer-Intensive Discretionary Service Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 218-234, January.
    15. Saif Benjaafar & Ming Hu, 2020. "Operations Management in the Age of the Sharing Economy: What Is Old and What Is New?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 93-101, January.
    16. Seo, Yoo Seok & Lim, JeongWook & Lee, Byeong Kwon & Park, Kun Soo, 2025. "Pricing and wage decisions for on-demand food delivery platforms with multiple customer classes and courier pools," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    17. Benjamin Legros, 2021. "Agents’ Self‐Routing for Blended Operations to Balance Inbound and Outbound Services," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3599-3614, October.
    18. Shiliang Cui & Kaili Li & Luyi Yang & Jinting Wang, 2022. "Slugging: Casual Carpooling for Urban Transit," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2516-2534, September.
    19. Liu Ming & Tunay Tunca & Yi Xu & Weiming Zhu, 2025. "Market Formation, Pricing, and Value Generation in Ride-Hailing Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1551-1570, September.
    20. Niam Yaraghi & Ramaswamy Ramesh & Giri Kumar Tayi, 2025. "Pay, Pat, and Clawback: Incentivizing Service Providers’ Participation in On-Demand Digital Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7579-7599, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:775-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.