IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i1p561-579.html

Intraday Scheduling with Patient Re-entries and Variability in Behaviours

Author

Listed:
  • Minglong Zhou

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

  • Gar Goei Loke

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

  • Chaithanya Bandi

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

  • Zi Qiang Glen Liau

    (University Orthopaedics, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore 119228)

  • Wilson Wang

    (University Orthopaedics, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore 119228)

Abstract

Problem definition : We consider the intraday scheduling problem in a group of orthopaedic clinics where the planner schedules appointment times, given a sequence of appointments. We consider patient re-entry—where patients may be required to go for an x-ray examination, returning to the same doctor they have seen—and variability in patient behaviours such as walk-ins, earliness, and no-shows, which leads to inefficiency such as long patient waiting time and physician overtime. Academic/practical relevance : In our data set, 25% of the patients are required to go for x-ray examination. We also found significant variability in patient behaviours. Hence, patient re-entry and variability in behaviours are common, but we found little in the literature that could handle them. Methodology : We formulate the problem as a two-stage optimization problem, where scheduling decisions are made in the first stage. Queue dynamics in the second stage are modeled under a P-Queue paradigm, which minimizes a risk index representing the chance of violating performance targets, such as patient waiting times. The model reduces to a sequence of mixed-integer linear-optimization problems. Results : Our model achieves significant reductions, in comparative studies against a sample average approximation (SAA) model, on patient waiting times, while keeping server overtime constant. Our simulations further characterize the types of uncertainties under which SAA performs poorly. Managerial insights : We present an optimization model that is easy to implement in practice and tractable to compute. Our simulations indicate that not accounting for patient re-entry or variability in patient behaviours will lead to suboptimal policies, especially when they have specific structure that should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Minglong Zhou & Gar Goei Loke & Chaithanya Bandi & Zi Qiang Glen Liau & Wilson Wang, 2022. "Intraday Scheduling with Patient Re-entries and Variability in Behaviours," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 561-579, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:561-579
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0959
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Qi, 2017. "Mitigating Delays and Unfairness in Appointment Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 566-583, February.
    2. Chrwan-Jyh Ho & Hon-Shiang Lau, 1992. "Minimizing Total Cost in Scheduling Outpatient Appointments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(12), pages 1750-1764, December.
    3. Chaithanya Bandi & Dimitris Bertsimas & Nataly Youssef, 2015. "Robust Queueing Theory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 676-700, June.
    4. Qingxia Kong & Shan Li & Nan Liu & Chung-Piaw Teo & Zhenzhen Yan, 2020. "Appointment Scheduling Under Time-Dependent Patient No-Show Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3480-3500, August.
    5. Patrick Jaillet & Jin Qi & Melvyn Sim, 2016. "Routing Optimization Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 186-200, February.
    6. Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Jiawei Zhang, 2014. "Sequencing Appointments for Service Systems Using Inventory Approximations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 251-262, May.
    7. S. Ayca Erdogan & Brian Denton, 2013. "Dynamic Appointment Scheduling of a Stochastic Server with Uncertain Demand," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 116-132, February.
    8. Jacob Feldman & Nan Liu & Huseyin Topaloglu & Serhan Ziya, 2014. "Appointment Scheduling Under Patient Preference and No-Show Behavior," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 794-811, August.
    9. J. G. Dai & Pengyi Shi, 2017. "A Two-Time-Scale Approach to Time-Varying Queues in Hospital Inpatient Flow Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 514-536, April.
    10. Itai Gurvich & James Luedtke & Tolga Tezcan, 2010. "Staffing Call Centers with Uncertain Demand Forecasts: A Chance-Constrained Optimization Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(7), pages 1093-1115, July.
    11. J. G. Dai & Tolga Tezcan, 2011. "State Space Collapse in Many-Server Diffusion Limits of Parallel Server Systems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 271-320, May.
    12. P. Patrick Wang, 1993. "Static and dynamic scheduling of customer arrivals to a single‐server system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 345-360, April.
    13. Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Jiawei Zhang, 2015. "Appointment Scheduling with Limited Distributional Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 316-334, February.
    14. Ruiwei Jiang & Siqian Shen & Yiling Zhang, 2017. "Integer Programming Approaches for Appointment Scheduling with Random No-Shows and Service Durations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1638-1656, December.
    15. Nicholas G. Hall & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Jin Qi & Melvyn Sim, 2015. "Managing Underperformance Risk in Project Portfolio Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 660-675, June.
    16. Dongdong Ge & Guohua Wan & Zizhuo Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2014. "A Note on Appointment Scheduling with Piecewise Linear Cost Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 1244-1251, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Wang & Yun Fong Lim & Gar Goei Loke, 2026. "Joint Capacity Allocation and Job Assignment Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 1047-1069, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Eekelen, Wouter, 2023. "Distributionally robust views on queues and related stochastic models," Other publications TiSEM 9b99fc05-9d68-48eb-ae8c-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Ruiwei Jiang & Siqian Shen & Yiling Zhang, 2017. "Integer Programming Approaches for Appointment Scheduling with Random No-Shows and Service Durations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1638-1656, December.
    3. Shuming Wang & Jun Li & Marcus Ang & Tsan Sheng Ng, 2024. "Appointment Scheduling with Delay Tolerance Heterogeneity," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1201-1224, September.
    4. Christos Zacharias & Tallys Yunes, 2020. "Multimodularity in the Stochastic Appointment Scheduling Problem with Discrete Arrival Epochs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 744-763, February.
    5. Yu Fu & Amarnath Banerjee, 2021. "A Stochastic Programming Model for Service Scheduling with Uncertain Demand: an Application in Open-Access Clinic Scheduling," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-32, September.
    6. Kazim Topuz & Timothy L. Urban & Robert A. Russell & Mehmet B. Yildirim, 2024. "Decision support system for appointment scheduling and overbooking under patient no-show behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 845-873, November.
    7. Carolin Bauerhenne & Rainer Kolisch & Andreas S. Schulz, 2024. "Robust Appointment Scheduling with Waiting Time Guarantees," Papers 2402.12561, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    8. Minglong Zhou & Melvyn Sim & Shao‐Wei Lam, 2022. "Advance admission scheduling via resource satisficing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4002-4020, November.
    9. Mahes, Roshan & Mandjes, Michel & Boon, Marko & Taylor, Peter, 2024. "Adaptive scheduling in service systems: A Dynamic programming approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 605-626.
    10. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    11. You Hui Goh & Zihao Li & Zhenzhen Yan, 2025. "Strategic Idling in Appointment Systems with Sequential Servers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 955-974, May.
    12. van Eekelen, Wouter & den Hertog, Dick & van Leeuwaarden, J.S.H., 2025. "Distributionally robust appointment scheduling that can deal with independent service times," Other publications TiSEM e6ac8cc7-43c6-42c6-9e11-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Shenghai Zhou & Yichuan Ding & Woonghee Tim Huh & Guohua Wan, 2021. "Constant Job‐Allowance Policies for Appointment Scheduling: Performance Bounds and Numerical Analysis," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2211-2231, July.
    14. Creemers, Stefan & Lambrecht, Marc R. & Beliën, Jeroen & Van den Broeke, Maud, 2021. "Evaluation of appointment scheduling rules: A multi-performance measurement approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. Tito Homem-de-Mello & Qingxia Kong & Rodrigo Godoy-Barba, 2022. "A Simulation Optimization Approach for the Appointment Scheduling Problem with Decision-Dependent Uncertainties," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2845-2865, September.
    16. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Cohn, Amy E.M. & Epelman, Marina A., 2019. "Analysis of models for the Stochastic Outpatient Procedure Scheduling Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 721-731.
    17. Jin Qi, 2017. "Mitigating Delays and Unfairness in Appointment Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 566-583, February.
    18. Pan, Xingwei & Geng, Na & Xie, Xiaolan & Wen, Jing, 2020. "Managing appointments with waiting time targets and random walk-ins," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Meersman, Tine & Maenhout, Broos & Fiems, Dieter, 2025. "Dynamic appointment rescheduling with patient preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(3), pages 498-514.
    20. Arlen Dean & Amirhossein Meisami & Henry Lam & Mark P. Van Oyen & Christopher Stromblad & Nick Kastango, 2022. "Quantile regression forests for individualized surgery scheduling," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 682-709, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:561-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.