IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v46y2021i2p405-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Popularity, Mixed Matchings, and Self-Duality

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Chung Huang

    (École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France)

  • Telikepalli Kavitha

    (Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400005, India)

Abstract

Our input instance is a bipartite graph G where each vertex has a preference list ranking its neighbors in a strict order of preference. A matching M is popular if there is no matching N such that the number of vertices that prefer N to M outnumber those that prefer M to N . Each edge is associated with a utility and we consider the problem of matching vertices in a popular and utility-optimal manner. It is known that it is NP-hard to compute a max-utility popular matching. So we consider mixed matchings : a mixed matching is a probability distribution or a lottery over matchings. Our main result is that the popular fractional matching polytope P G is half-integral and in the special case where a stable matching in G is a perfect matching, this polytope is integral. This implies that there is always a max-utility popular mixed matching which is the average of two integral matchings. So in order to implement a max-utility popular mixed matching in G , we need just a single random bit. We analyze the popular fractional matching polytope whose description may have exponentially many constraints via an extended formulation with a linear number of constraints. The linear program that gives rise to this formulation has an unusual property: self-duality . The self-duality of this LP plays a crucial role in our proof. Our result implies that a max-utility popular half-integral matching in G and also in the roommates problem (where the input graph need not be bipartite) can be computed in polynomial time.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Chung Huang & Telikepalli Kavitha, 2021. "Popularity, Mixed Matchings, and Self-Duality," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 405-427, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:46:y:2021:i:2:p:405-427
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2020.1063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2020.1063
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2020.1063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamás Fleiner, 2003. "A Fixed-Point Approach to Stable Matchings and Some Applications," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 103-126, February.
    2. Manfred W. Padberg & M. R. Rao, 1982. "Odd Minimum Cut-Sets and b -Matchings," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 67-80, February.
    3. Alvin E. Roth & Uriel G. Rothblum & John H. Vande Vate, 1993. "Stable Matchings, Optimal Assignments, and Linear Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 803-828, November.
    4. M. L. Balinski, 1965. "Integer Programming: Methods, Uses, Computations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 253-313, November.
    5. Bogomolnaia, Anna & Moulin, Herve, 2001. "A New Solution to the Random Assignment Problem," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 295-328, October.
    6. Katta, Akshay-Kumar & Sethuraman, Jay, 2006. "A solution to the random assignment problem on the full preference domain," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 231-250, November.
    7. Chung-Piaw Teo & Jay Sethuraman, 1998. "The Geometry of Fractional Stable Matchings and Its Applications," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 874-891, November.
    8. Pavlos Eirinakis & Dimitrios Magos & Ioannis Mourtos & Panayiotis Miliotis, 2014. "Polyhedral Aspects of Stable Marriage," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 656-671, August.
    9. Florian Brandl & Felix Brandt & Hans Georg Seedig, 2016. "Consistent Probabilistic Social Choice," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 1839-1880, September.
    10. Roth, Alvin E, 1991. "A Natural Experiment in the Organization of Entry-Level Labor Markets: Regional Markets for New Physicians and Surgeons in the United Kingdom," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(3), pages 415-440, June.
    11. P. C. Fishburn, 1984. "Probabilistic Social Choice Based on Simple Voting Comparisons," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 51(4), pages 683-692.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Gudmundsson, 2019. "Compromises and Rewards: stable and non-manipulable probabilistic matching," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(2), pages 365-392, June.
    2. Aziz, Haris & Brandl, Florian & Brandt, Felix & Brill, Markus, 2018. "On the tradeoff between efficiency and strategyproofness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-18.
    3. Haris Aziz & Bettina Klaus, 2017. "Random Matching under Priorities: Stability and No Envy Concepts," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'Econométrie et d'Economie politique (DEEP) 17.09, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, DEEP.
    4. Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz, 2018. "The object allocation problem with random priorities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 71-89.
    5. Aziz, Haris & Brandl, Florian, 2022. "The vigilant eating rule: A general approach for probabilistic economic design with constraints," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 168-187.
    6. Doğan, Battal & Yıldız, Kemal, 2016. "Efficiency and stability of probabilistic assignments in marriage problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 47-58.
    7. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    8. Fleiner, Tamas, 2003. "On the stable b-matching polytope," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 149-158, October.
    9. Kesten, Onur & Unver, Utku, 2015. "A theory of school choice lotteries," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(2), May.
    10. Pavlos Eirinakis & Dimitrios Magos & Ioannis Mourtos & Panayiotis Miliotis, 2014. "Polyhedral Aspects of Stable Marriage," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 656-671, August.
    11. Han, Xiang, 0. "A theory of fair random allocation under priorities," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society.
    12. Aziz, Haris & Brandl, Florian & Brandt, Felix, 2015. "Universal Pareto dominance and welfare for plausible utility functions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 123-133.
    13. Jay Sethuraman & Chung-Piaw Teo & Liwen Qian, 2006. "Many-to-One Stable Matching: Geometry and Fairness," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 581-596, August.
    14. Juárez, Noelia & Neme, Pablo & Oviedo, Jorge, 2022. "Lattice structure of the random stable set in many-to-many matching markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 255-273.
    15. Haris Aziz & Florian Brandl, 2020. "The Vigilant Eating Rule: A General Approach for Probabilistic Economic Design with Constraints," Papers 2008.08991, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    16. Florian Brandl & Felix Brandt & Christian Stricker, 2022. "An analytical and experimental comparison of maximal lottery schemes," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(1), pages 5-38, January.
    17. Chao Huang, 2022. "Two-sided matching with firms' complementary preferences," Papers 2205.05599, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    18. Liu, Peng, 2020. "Random assignments on sequentially dichotomous domains," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 565-584.
    19. Hai Nguyen & Thành Nguyen & Alexander Teytelboym, 2021. "Stability in Matching Markets with Complex Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7438-7454, December.
    20. Paula Jaramillo & Çaǧatay Kayı & Flip Klijn, 2014. "On the exhaustiveness of truncation and dropping strategies in many-to-many matching markets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 793-811, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:46:y:2021:i:2:p:405-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.