Thresholds and Transitivity in Stochastic Consumer Choice: A Multinomial Logit Analysis
In previous work, thresholds have been introduced to describe situations where the consumer is indifferent between any two alternatives. Krishnan (Krishnan, K. S. 1977. Incorporating thresholds of indifference in probabilistic choice models. Management Sci. 23 (July) 1224--1233.) formalised thresholds as minimum perceivable differences between the utilities of the alternatives compared and incorporated such thresholds into the binary logit model. The present paper provides an extension and application of the theory to situations where the decision maker is confronted with more than two alternatives. In such situations thresholds can lead to systematic and predictable intransitivity of indifference, violating a basic postulate of utility theory. Explicit probabilities of transitive and intransitive choices are derived within the framework of the multinomial logit model and the stochastic consumer theory associated with this model. The empirical applicability and managerial usefulness of the proposed theory is illustrated using a transportation example with three alternatives. The data employed reflect actual travellers' use of interurban transport modes in Greece. Parameters are estimated by a maximum-likelihood technique, based on a gradient search method. The results support the existence of thresholds. The application has important policy implications.
Volume (Year): 30 (1984)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 7240 Parkway Drive, Suite 300, Hanover, MD 21076 USA|
Web page: http://www.informs.org/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:1:p:110-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.