IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v27y1981i11p1326-1339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Strategic Behavior in State-Owned Enterprises---Business and Political Orientations

Author

Listed:
  • Jehiel Zif

    (Tel-Aviv University and Northeastern University (Visiting))

Abstract

Two different functions, managing the business in the product or service markets and managing public support in the political markets, must be performed by managers of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Each organization has to strike a strategic balance between these two functions. The way this is done is indicative of the organizational orientation and behavior. The greater the relative emphasis on managing public support, the stronger is the political orientation in our terminology. The greater the relative emphasis on managing the business, the stronger is the business orientation. This paper proposes that explanation of behavior of SOEs can be improved by taking into account the orientation of management toward the mix of business and politics. Although the combination of business and political goals of SOE has long been recognized, the mix of business and political activities as a strategic variable was rarely distinguished. This strategic variable is operationally defined, measured and explained. An insight into the purposes of business and political activities is gained through an analysis of the external and internal orientation of management. The organization may concentrate internally, on its own needs and goals, or externally, on the needs and goals of the outside publics. This distinction can be useful in descriptive as well as normative research. Management orientation, whether business or political, is associated with a specific set of behavioral tendencies or implications. These implications are expressed in propositions which state that an increase in the political and external orientation of management are related to an increased likelihood that: 1. Sales rather than profit goals would be emphasized. 2. Low prices relative to costs would be charged. 3. Goals would be relatively unstable. 4. Goals would be stated in unclear or vague terms. 5. Performance evaluation would be carried out on an irregular basis. 6. Public support would be sought prior to action. 7. Top management would be recruited from the public sector. An exploratory survey of 50 executives of SOEs in fourteen Latin American, Asian and African countries was used to test the propositions. With few exceptions, the empirical results support the above propositions. Further research, which will include additional variables and a larger sample, can increase the reliability of the findings and improve our understanding of the factors which influence management orientation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jehiel Zif, 1981. "Managerial Strategic Behavior in State-Owned Enterprises---Business and Political Orientations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(11), pages 1326-1339, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:11:p:1326-1339
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.27.11.1326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.11.1326
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.27.11.1326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Saul Estrin & Tomasz Mickiewicz, 2017. "Ownership identity, strategy and performance: Business group affiliates versus independent firms in India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 281-311, June.
    2. Shobha Tewari & Bibek Bhattacharya, 2023. "Financial resources, corporate social responsibility, and ownership type: Evidence from India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1093-1132, September.
    3. Daniela Cristofoli & Angelo Ditillo & Mariannunziata Liguori & Mariafrancesca Sicilia & Ileana Steccolini, 2010. "Do environmental and task characteristics matter in the control of externalized local public services?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 350-372, March.
    4. Goodwin, Neil, 2000. "Leadership and the UK health service," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 49-60, February.
    5. Peeter Peda & Daniela Argento & Giuseppe Grossi, 2013. "Governance and Performance of a Mixed Public-Private Enterprise: An Assessment of a Company in the Estonian Water Sector," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 185-196, June.
    6. Roberto Cafferata, 2010. "The enduring presence of groups and public enterprises in the Italian economy," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(3), pages 199-220, August.
    7. Li, Jiarong & Guo, Jie Michael & Hu, Nan & Tang, Ke, 2021. "Do corporate managers believe in luck? Evidence of the Chinese zodiac effect," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Erming Xu & Hui Yang & J. Quan & Yuan Lu, 2015. "Organizational slack and corporate social performance: Empirical evidence from China’s public firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 181-198, March.
    9. Anthony Ferner, 1987. "Public Enterprise and the Politics of `Commercialism': Changing Industrial Relations in British and Spanish Railways," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 1(2), pages 179-203, June.
    10. Zhu, Mengye & Qi, Ye & Belis, David & Lu, Jiaqi & Kerremans, Bart, 2019. "The China wind paradox: The role of state-owned enterprises in wind power investment versus wind curtailment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 200-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:11:p:1326-1339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.