IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v45y2015i5p425-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaccine Prioritization for Effective Pandemic Response

Author

Listed:
  • Eva K. Lee

    (Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; NSF I/UCRC Center for Health Organization Transformation, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Fan Yuan

    (Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; NSF I/UCRC Center for Health Organization Transformation, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Ferdinand H. Pietz

    (Strategic National Stockpile, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30322)

  • Bernard A. Benecke

    (Global Disease Detection and Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30322)

  • Greg Burel

    (Strategic National Stockpile, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30322)

Abstract

Public health experts agree that the best strategy to contain a pandemic, where vaccination is the prophylactic treatment but vaccine supply is limited, is to give higher priority to higher-risk populations. We derive a mathematical decision framework to track the effectiveness of prioritized vaccination through the course of a pandemic. Our approach couples a disease-propagation model with a vaccine queueing model and an optimization engine to determine optimal prioritized coverage in a mixed-vaccination strategy. This demonstrably minimizes infection and mortality. Given estimated outbreak characteristics, vaccine inventory levels, and individual risk factors, the study reveals an optimal coverage for the high-risk group that results in the lowest overall attack and mortality rates. This knowledge is critical to public health policy makers for determining the best strategies for population protection. This becomes particularly important in determining when to switch from a prioritized strategy emphasizing high-risk groups to a nonprioritized strategy in which the vaccine becomes available publicly. Our analysis highlights the importance of uninterrupted vaccine supply. Although the 2009 H1N1 supply, received in interrupted batches, eventually covered over 30 percent of the population, the resulting attack and mortality rates are significantly inferior to those in a scenario where only 20 percent of the population is covered with an uninterrupted supply. We also learned that early vaccination is important. Contrasting the 2009 H1N1 supply to a 10 percent uninterrupted supply, a three-week delay in vaccination reduces the 9.9 percent infection reduction of the former to a mere 0.9 percent. The optimal trigger for switching from prioritized to nonprioritized vaccination is sensitive to infectivity and vulnerability of the high-risk groups. Our study further underscores the importance of throughput efficiency in dispensing and its effects on the overall attack and mortality rates. The more transmissible the virus is, the lower the threshold for switching to nonprioritized vaccination. Our model, which can be generalized, allows the incorporation of seasonality and virus mutation of the biological agents. The system empowers policy makers to make the right decisions at the appropriate time to save more lives, better utilize limited resources, and reduce the health-service burden during a pandemic event.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva K. Lee & Fan Yuan & Ferdinand H. Pietz & Bernard A. Benecke & Greg Burel, 2015. "Vaccine Prioritization for Effective Pandemic Response," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 425-443, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:45:y:2015:i:5:p:425-443
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2015.0814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2015.0814
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2015.0814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva K. Lee & Ferdinand Pietz & Bernard Benecke & Jacquelyn Mason & Greg Burel, 2013. "Advancing Public Health and Medical Preparedness with Operations Research," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 79-98, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    RePEc Biblio mentions

    As found on the RePEc Biblio, the curated bibliography for Economics:
    1. > Economics of Welfare > Health Economics > Economics of Pandemics > Policy responses > Vaccination

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Bumblauskas & Amy Igou & Salil Kalghatgi & Cole Wetzel, 2022. "Public Policy and Broader Applications for the Use of Text Analytics During Pandemics," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 568-581, November.
    2. Muckstadt, John A. & Klein, Michael G. & Jackson, Peter L. & Gougelet, Robert M. & Hupert, Nathaniel, 2023. "Efficient and effective large-scale vaccine distribution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. Duijzer, Lotty Evertje & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dekker, Rommert, 2018. "Literature review: The vaccine supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 174-192.
    4. Li, X. & Phillips, J.C., 2017. "Prediction (early recognition) of emerging flu strain clusters," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 371-378.
    5. Nafiseh Shamsi Gamchi & S. Ali Torabi & Fariborz Jolai, 2021. "A novel vehicle routing problem for vaccine distribution using SIR epidemic model," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 155-188, March.
    6. Duijzer, Lotty Evertje & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dekker, Rommert, 2018. "The benefits of combining early aspecific vaccination with later specific vaccination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 606-619.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Asgary & Svetozar Zarko Valtchev & Michael Chen & Mahdi M. Najafabadi & Jianhong Wu, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Model of Drive-Through Vaccination Simulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Fadaki, Masih & Abareshi, Ahmad & Far, Shaghayegh Maleki & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2022. "Multi-period vaccine allocation model in a pandemic: A case study of COVID-19 in Australia," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Duijzer, Lotty Evertje & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dekker, Rommert, 2018. "Literature review: The vaccine supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 174-192.
    4. Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra & des-Bordes, Emmanuel & Kıbış, Eyyüb Y., 2018. "A new epidemics–logistics model: Insights into controlling the Ebola virus disease in West Africa," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1046-1063.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:45:y:2015:i:5:p:425-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.