IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jhisi0/v16y2021i4p1-18.html

Security/Privacy Perceptions in Patient Use of Online Medical Records: Study From a Large National Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Surma Mukhopadhyay

    (Longwood University, USA)

  • Ramsankar Basak

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA)

  • Brian J. Reithel

    (University of Mississippi, USA)

Abstract

Data breaches expose individuals to economic, mental, and social trauma. Electronic health information of individuals not only includes reports of medical diagnosis, medication histories but also comprises personally identifiable information (PII) (e.g, birth date). We examined the association of vulnerability perception - defined as privacy or security breach concerns and provider encouragement with the use of online medical records (OMR) and moderating effects of provider encouragement and age in the relationship between vulnerability and usage. Data came from a national population-based survey, the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). This study included 1770 adult individuals many of who are chronic disease patients or cancer survivors. The majority of these subjects did report use of OMR. We found security/privacy related vulnerability and provider encouragement significantly predict patients' use of OMR. Healthcare providers and developers should work with patients to mitigate concerns and enable patients to derive benefits from using online medical records.

Suggested Citation

  • Surma Mukhopadhyay & Ramsankar Basak & Brian J. Reithel, 2021. "Security/Privacy Perceptions in Patient Use of Online Medical Records: Study From a Large National Survey," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJHISI.295816
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yan, 2018. "Blockchain tokens and the potential democratization of entrepreneurship and innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 567-575.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuk Ming Tang & Ka Yin Chau, 2025. "Blockchain evolution and management theoretical (BEMT) model based on integrated semantic similarity and co-citation analysis for next generation service industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 475-494, June.
    2. Ferdinand Thies & Sören Wallbach & Michael Wessel & Markus Besler & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Initial coin offerings and the cryptocurrency hype - the moderating role of exogenous and endogenous signals," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1691-1705, September.
    3. Magnus Schückes & Tobias Gutmann, 2021. "Why do startups pursue initial coin offerings (ICOs)? The role of economic drivers and social identity on funding choice," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1027-1052, August.
    4. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    5. Krishna Sharma & Khemraj Bhatt & Indra Giri, 2026. "Regulatory Migration to Europe: ICO Reallocation Following U.S. Securities Enforcement," Papers 2602.00138, arXiv.org.
    6. Belém Barbosa & José Ramón Saura & Dag Bennett, 2024. "How do entrepreneurs perform digital marketing across the customer journey? A review and discussion of the main uses," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 69-103, February.
    7. Ravi Kashyap, 2024. "The Concentration Risk Indicator: Raising the Bar for Financial Stability and Portfolio Performance Measurement," Papers 2408.07271, arXiv.org.
    8. Alexander Grünewald & Tan Gürpinar & Carina Culotta & Alicia Guderian, 2024. "Archetypes of blockchain-based business models in enterprise networks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 633-665, December.
    9. Simona Ibba & Andrea Pinna & Maria Ilaria Lunesu & Michele Marchesi & Roberto Tonelli, 2018. "Initial Coin Offerings and Agile Practices," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Jaspreet Kaur & Satish Kumar & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Marina Dabić & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore & Rohit Joshi, 2024. "Barriers to blockchain adoption for supply chain finance: the case of Indian SMEs," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 303-340, March.
    11. Esmat, Ayman & de Vos, Martijn & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Palensky, Peter & Epema, Dick, 2021. "A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    12. Wilson, Kathleen Bridget & Karg, Adam & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2022. "Prospecting non-fungible tokens in the digital economy: Stakeholders and ecosystem, risk and opportunity," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 657-670.
    13. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    14. Nguyen, Phong Thanh & Nguyen, Linh Thi My, 2022. "Understanding platform market value through decentralization governance — An integrative model from signaling and mechanism design theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Mayank Joshipura & Rim El Khoury & Muneer M. Alshater, 2025. "ICOs conceptual unveiled: scholarly review of an entrepreneurial finance innovation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-47, December.
    16. Jun-Ho Huh & Seong-Kyu Kim, 2019. "The Blockchain Consensus Algorithm for Viable Management of New and Renewable Energies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Jan Schwiderowski & Asger Balle Pedersen & Roman Beck, 2024. "Crypto Tokens and Token Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 319-332, February.
    18. Samieifar, Shadi & Baur, Dirk G., 2021. "Read me if you can! An analysis of ICO white papers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    19. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Andrea Appolloni & Suhaiza Zailani & Mohammad Iranmanesh, 2025. "Mapping the research landscape of blockchain and crowdfunding," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-38, December.
    20. Giuliano Sansone & Flavio Santalucia & Davide Viglialoro & Paolo Landoni, 2023. "Blockchain for social good and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from a case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2182-2193, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.