IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v13y2022i3p170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Impacting on CMMI Acceptance Among Software Development Firms: A Qualitative Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Hamad Alsawalqah
  • Yazan Alshamaileh
  • Bashar Al-Shboul
  • Areej Shorman
  • Azzam Sleit

Abstract

Productive firms try to deliver high-quality products to be globally competitive. Therefore, software development firms need to adhere to a set of best practices that improve their processes. Capability maturity model integration (CMMI) comprehensively assesses the maturity of a firm's processes. Representing a major departure from the traditional method of running quality management in software development firms, the adoption of CMMI has major ramifications and long-lasting effects on a company’s quality procedures. Unfortunately, the literature lacks information as to how firms should implement CMMI. Our research involved conducting an exploratory study examining the major factors that influenced CMMI adoption for Jordanian software development firms. Quality managers from eighteen software development organizations took an open-ended survey. The results show that the main factors in CMMI implementation in Jordanian software development firms were issues of its being too costly, having no time, dealing with market scope, and lack of top management support. Conclusions are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamad Alsawalqah & Yazan Alshamaileh & Bashar Al-Shboul & Areej Shorman & Azzam Sleit, 2019. "Factors Impacting on CMMI Acceptance Among Software Development Firms: A Qualitative Assessment," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 170-170, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/0/0/38706/41689
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/0/38706
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Princely Ifinedo, 2011. "An Empirical Analysis Of Factors Influencing Internet/E-Business Technologies Adoption By Smes In Canada," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(04), pages 731-766.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Ana Vera & Tulla Antoni F., 2019. "Innovation, Spatial Loyalty, and ICTs as Locational Determinants of Rural Development in the Catalan Pyrenees," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(4), pages 517-540, December.
    2. Mohammad Saleem AL-SHURA & Abdelrahim M. ZABADI & Mohamad ABUGHAZALEH & Marwa A. ALHADI, 2018. "Critical Success Factors for Adopting Cloud Computing in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Companies," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(2), pages 123-137, December.
    3. Manish Mohan Baral & Amitabh Verma, 2021. "Cloud Computing Adoption for Healthcare: An Empirical Study Using SEM Approach," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 255-275, September.
    4. Manoj Thomas & Daniela Costa & Tiago Oliveira, 2016. "Assessing the role of IT-enabled process virtualization on green IT adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 693-710, August.
    5. Shui-Lien Chen & June-Hong Chen & Yung Hsin Lee, 2018. "A Comparison of Competing Models for Understanding Industrial Organization’s Acceptance of Cloud Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Waranpong Boonsiritomachai & G. Michael McGrath & Stephen Burgess, 2016. "Exploring business intelligence and its depth of maturity in Thai SMEs," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1220663-122, December.
    7. Acheampong Owusu, 2017. "Business intelligence systems and bank performance in Ghana: The balanced scorecard approach," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1364056-136, January.
    8. Jang, Sung Hee & Kim, Rachel H. & Lee, Chang Won, 2016. "Effect of u-healthcare service quality on usage intention in a healthcare service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 396-403.
    9. Andreea-Diana Suciu (Vodă) & Andra Ioana Maria Tudor & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Lavinia Dovleac & Gabriel Brătucu, 2021. "IoT Technologies as Instruments for SMEs’ Innovation and Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    10. James A. Cunningham & Nadja Damij & Dolores Modic & Femi Olan, 2023. "MSME technology adoption, entrepreneurial mindset and value creation: a configurational approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1574-1598, October.
    11. Fawad Ahmed & Yuan Jian Qin & Luis Martínez, 2019. "Sustainable Change Management through Employee Readiness: Decision Support System Adoption in Technology-Intensive British E-Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Elnivan Moreira de Souza & Paulo César de Sousa Batista, 2017. "Strategic Antecedents and Consequents for the Performance of E-Business Companies," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(1), pages 59-85, January.
    13. Arfan Shahzad & Rohail Hassan & Adejare Yusuff Aremu & Arsalan Hussain & Rab Nawaz Lodhi, 2021. "Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 805-826, June.
    14. Vu Linh Toan Le & Tien Hoang Nguyen & Khanh Duy Pham, 2023. "What Drives Industry 4.0 Technologies Adoption? Evidence from a SEM-Neural Network Approach in the Context of Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.