IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmsjnl/v14y2024i1p63.html

ESG Score and Market Value: The Role of the Family Firm Evidence from the Italian Listed Market

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Maria Bifulco
  • Riccardo Tiscini

Abstract

In recent years, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and disclosure has become a critical component of corporate finance and accounting. Indeed, increasingly, companies seek to demonstrate their accountability to the environment and society in order to meet the expectations of different stakeholders interested in ESG performance (Garcia-Sanchez & Garcia-Sanchez, 2020). Customers, regulators, employees, suppliers, social and activist groups, media and lenders are all potential stakeholders in sustainability accountability (Arif et al., 2021; Camilleri, 2015; Sajjad et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the shareholders, institutional investors and individuals, looking to invest their money in firms with sustainable finance goals and high levels of ESG performance (Lourenço et al., 2014). Companies are supposed to make and disclose sustainable initiatives in organizational decisions (Garcia-Sanchez et al., 2014) and managers convey the focus of their efforts towards a more sustainable environment and society paying much attention to ESG indicators (Broadstock et al., 2019). This paper investigates the value of ESG score for family firms (FF) and non-family firms (NFF). Stemming from previous studies (Martínez-Ferrero & Frías-Aceituno, 2015), ESG performance in family business context is still unexplored. Indeed, most of the scholars have focused their effort on exploring the adoption of FF’s non-financial disclosure while, to the best of our knowledge, no one has investigated the effect of the type of firm (family or non-family) in the relationship between non-financial performance (ESG) and financial performance. The results of the analyzes demonstrate that there is no significant relationship between non-financial performance (ESG performance) and the value of companies. Indeed, for both the hypotheses there is just a positive but non-significant correlation. This evidence was verified for both FF and NFF panel.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Maria Bifulco & Riccardo Tiscini, 2024. "ESG Score and Market Value: The Role of the Family Firm Evidence from the Italian Listed Market," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-63, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/download/0/0/49752/53780
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/0/49752
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    2. Tenuta, Paolo & Cambrea, Domenico Rocco, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The role of executive directors in family firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    3. Luis Gomez-Mejia & Cristina Cruz & Claudia Imperatore, 2014. "Financial Reporting and the Protection of Socioemotional Wealth in Family-Controlled Firms," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 387-402, September.
    4. Graff Zivin Joshua & Small Arthur, 2005. "A Modigliani-Miller Theory of Altruistic Corporate Social Responsibility," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Mary E. Barth & Greg Clinch, 2009. "Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3‐4), pages 253-288, April.
    6. Mary E. Barth & Greg Clinch, 2009. "Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3-4), pages 253-288.
    7. Michela Cordazzo & Laura Bini & Giuseppe Marzo, 2020. "Does the EU Directive on non‐financial information influence the value relevance of ESG disclosure? Italian evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3470-3483, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Maria Bifulco & Carlo Caserio & Francesca di Donato & Sara Trucco, 2025. "Does Sustainable Performance Matter for Nonfinancial Disclosure Readability? A Fog Index Analysis on Italian‐Listed Companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 5601-5623, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Maria Bifulco & Riccardo Savio & Francesco Paolone & Riccardo Tiscini, 2023. "The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3231-3241, November.
    2. Steve Fortin & Ahmad Hammami & Michel Magnan, 2021. "Re‐exploring Fair Value Accounting and Value Relevance: An Examination of Underlying Securities," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(2), pages 220-250, June.
    3. Alessandro Mechelli & Riccardo Cimini, 2021. "The effect of corporate governance and investor protection environments on the value relevance of new accounting standards: the case of IFRS 9 and IAS 39," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1241-1266, December.
    4. Ana Isabel Lopes & Isabel Costa Lourenço & Mark T Soliman & Manuel Castelo Branco, 2021. "Is the relation between non-controlling interests and parent companies misleading?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(1), pages 24-50, February.
    5. Mark Wallis, 2026. "Has Accounting Really Lost Its Value Relevance?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(1), pages 3-23, March.
    6. Doron Israeli, 2015. "Recognition versus disclosure: evidence from fair value of investment property," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1457-1503, December.
    7. Adam Arian & John Sands & Stuart Tooley, 2023. "Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Jeremiah Green & Henock Louis & Jalal Sani, 2022. "Intangible Investments, Scaling, and the Trend in the Accrual–Cash Flow Association," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(4), pages 1551-1582, September.
    9. Kim, Young Jun & Choi, Sera & Lee, Eugenia Y. & Lee, Su Jeong, 2023. "Perpetual securities and stock prices: Korean evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    10. Pandey, Ashish & Tripathi, Abhinava & Guhathakurta, Kousik, 2022. "The impact of banking regulations and accounting standards on estimating discretionary loan loss provisions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    11. Eva López‐González & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & Emma García‐Meca, 2019. "Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 819-831, July.
    12. Xitong Li & Hongwei Zhu & Luo Zuo, 2021. "Reporting Technologies and Textual Readability: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 1025-1042, September.
    13. Carmelo Reverte, 2021. "Do investors value the voluntary assurance of sustainability information? Evidence from the Spanish stock market," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 793-809, September.
    14. Abdulrahman Alomair & Alan Farley & Helen Hong Yang, 2022. "The impact of IFRS adoption on the value relevance of accounting information in Saudi Arabia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2839-2878, June.
    15. Sudipta Bose & Amitav Saha & Indra Abeysekera, 2020. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure: Evidence from Regulatory Decisions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(4), pages 455-494, December.
    16. Alessandro Mechelli & Vincenzo Sforza & Alessandra Stefanoni & Riccardo Cimini, 2018. "The Usefulness of Regulatory Capital for Investors’ Judgments in the Basel 3 Framework," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 1-72, April.
    17. Claudia Frisenna & Davide Rizzotti, 2025. "The effects of family entrenchment and board independence on CEO turnover," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(4), pages 977-1005, December.
    18. Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & André, Paul & Evans, Lisa, 2012. "The transition to IFRS and the value relevance of financial statements in Greece," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 262-277.
    19. Chiara Crovini & Francesco Giunta & Christian Nielsen & Lorenzo Simoni, 2026. "Market Valuation of Risk Reporting: The Role of Business Model Disclosure," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 62(1), pages 1-49, March.
    20. Ine Umans & Maarten Corten, 2023. "Ownership succession intentions affecting earnings management in private family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 827-842, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.