IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v13y2021i2p28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EEG Patterns and Performance When Facing the Cardinal Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Frederick T. Travis
  • Jonathan B. Lipman
  • Niyazi Parim
  • Peter L. Hodak
  • Jacqueline J. Leete

Abstract

1) Background and Objectives- Position in space and passage of time are encoded in the firing of thalamic, hippocampal and entorhinal cortices in rodents. Head direction cells have been reported in freely moving monkeys, and differential brain patterns have been observed in humans while playing a navigation video game and in response to changes in electromagnetic fields. The sensitivity of organisms to environmental and electromagnetic cues could explain recommendations from a traditional system of architecture, Vastu architecture, which recommends aligning homes to the cardinal directions. 2) Hypothesis- Vastu architecture predicts that facing east and north are more advantageous than facing west and south. If facing east and north are more advantageous, then subjects should show distinct EEG patterns and improved performance when facing east and north compared to west or south. 3) Materials and Methods- EEG coherence patterns from 32-channel EEG and time-to-complete jigsaw puzzles were compared while subjects faced the four cardinal directions. 4) Results- When facing east and north, subjects’ frontal beta2 and gamma EEG coherence were significantly higher, and they assembled jigsaw puzzles significantly faster than when facing west or south. 5) Discussion- The brain findings fit the performance data. Better focus, which would reasonably be related with faster performance, is associated with higher levels of beta2 and gamma coherence. 6) Conclusion- These data support the possibility that the human brain may be sensitive to cardinal directions. This highlights how intimately we are connected to the environment and suggests a factor that may be important in orienting work spaces and designing class rooms.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederick T. Travis & Jonathan B. Lipman & Niyazi Parim & Peter L. Hodak & Jacqueline J. Leete, 2021. "EEG Patterns and Performance When Facing the Cardinal Directions," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/0/0/45144/48136
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/0/45144
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torkel Hafting & Marianne Fyhn & Sturla Molden & May-Britt Moser & Edvard I. Moser, 2005. "Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7052), pages 801-806, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabella C. Wagner & Luise P. Graichen & Boryana Todorova & Andre Lüttig & David B. Omer & Matthias Stangl & Claus Lamm, 2023. "Entorhinal grid-like codes and time-locked network dynamics track others navigating through space," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Taylor J. Malone & Nai-Wen Tien & Yan Ma & Lian Cui & Shangru Lyu & Garret Wang & Duc Nguyen & Kai Zhang & Maxym V. Myroshnychenko & Jean Tyan & Joshua A. Gordon & David A. Kupferschmidt & Yi Gu, 2024. "A consistent map in the medial entorhinal cortex supports spatial memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Kyerl Park & Yoonsoo Yeo & Kisung Shin & Jeehyun Kwag, 2024. "Egocentric neural representation of geometric vertex in the retrosplenial cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Noga Mosheiff & Haggai Agmon & Avraham Moriel & Yoram Burak, 2017. "An efficient coding theory for a dynamic trajectory predicts non-uniform allocation of entorhinal grid cells to modules," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Balázs Ujfalussy & Tamás Kiss & Péter Érdi, 2009. "Parallel Computational Subunits in Dentate Granule Cells Generate Multiple Place Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Louis-Emmanuel Martinet & Denis Sheynikhovich & Karim Benchenane & Angelo Arleo, 2011. "Spatial Learning and Action Planning in a Prefrontal Cortical Network Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Florian Raudies & Michael E Hasselmo, 2012. "Modeling Boundary Vector Cell Firing Given Optic Flow as a Cue," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Avgar, Tal & Deardon, Rob & Fryxell, John M., 2013. "An empirically parameterized individual based model of animal movement, perception, and memory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 158-172.
    9. Sabrina L. L. Maoz & Matthias Stangl & Uros Topalovic & Daniel Batista & Sonja Hiller & Zahra M. Aghajan & Barbara Knowlton & John Stern & Jean-Philippe Langevin & Itzhak Fried & Dawn Eliashiv & Nanth, 2023. "Dynamic neural representations of memory and space during human ambulatory navigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Qiming Shao & Ligu Chen & Xiaowan Li & Miao Li & Hui Cui & Xiaoyue Li & Xinran Zhao & Yuying Shi & Qiang Sun & Kaiyue Yan & Guangfu Wang, 2024. "A non-canonical visual cortical-entorhinal pathway contributes to spatial navigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Fabian Kessler & Julia Frankenstein & Constantin A. Rothkopf, 2024. "Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Alexander Thomas Keinath, 2016. "The Preferred Directions of Conjunctive Grid X Head Direction Cells in the Medial Entorhinal Cortex Are Periodically Organized," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Federica Sigismondi & Yangwen Xu & Mattia Silvestri & Roberto Bottini, 2024. "Altered grid-like coding in early blind people," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Netto, Vinicius M. & Brigatti, Edgardo & Meirelles, João & Ribeiro, Fabiano L. & Pace, Bruno & Cacholas, Caio & Sanches, Patricia Mara, 2018. "Cities, from information to interaction," SocArXiv jgz5d, Center for Open Science.
    15. Davide Spalla & Alessandro Treves & Charlotte N. Boccara, 2022. "Angular and linear speed cells in the parahippocampal circuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Thibault Cholvin & Marlene Bartos, 2022. "Hemisphere-specific spatial representation by hippocampal granule cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Johnson Ying & Alexandra T. Keinath & Raphael Lavoie & Erika Vigneault & Salah El Mestikawy & Mark P. Brandon, 2022. "Disruption of the grid cell network in a mouse model of early Alzheimer’s disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Torsten Neher & Amir Hossein Azizi & Sen Cheng, 2017. "From grid cells to place cells with realistic field sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, July.
    19. Hristina Ivanova Zlatanova & Maria Todorova Georgieva-Kotetarova & Natalia Borisova Vilmosh & Ilin Kostadinov Kandilarov, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effect of Cariprazine on Memory and Cognition in Experimental Rodent Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-11, November.
    20. Krishna Choudhary & Sven Berberich & Thomas T. G. Hahn & James M. McFarland & Mayank R. Mehta, 2024. "Spontaneous persistent activity and inactivity in vivo reveals differential cortico-entorhinal functional connectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.