IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v16y2023i10p10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management Culture, Structure, and Process: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Minela Nuhic-Meskovic
  • Admir Meskovic

Abstract

In the contemporary business environment, companies face a wide range of risks that necessitate effective risk management strategies. Risk management can be approached through either a traditional or integrated concept, which hinges on a company's ability to avoid, reduce, and transform risks into opportunities. This research aims to investigate the risk management practices employed by joint-stock companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study will focus on evaluating the risk management culture, structure, and processes implemented by these companies. The research was conducted using a questionnaire distributed to a sample of 141 companies listed on two stock exchanges in B&H. The survey included 31 identified risk management components related to culture, processes, and organizational structure. To enhance accuracy, the survey responses were improved using a Likert scale, replacing the previous "Yes – No" dummy approach. Before administering the survey, all components were validated by a group of experts. The findings revealed that companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) have inadequately developed components of an integrated risk management concept. The research results suggest that B&H companies primarily rely on traditional risk management approaches, failing to keep up with the global trend of implementing risk management standards. This situation may lead to adverse implications for BH companies and its economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Minela Nuhic-Meskovic & Admir Meskovic, 2023. "Risk Management Culture, Structure, and Process: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Evidence," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/49304/53207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/49304
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cican Simona-Iulia, 2014. "Comparative Study Between Traditional And Enterprise Risk Management -A Theoretical Approach," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 276-282, July.
    2. Milos Sprcic, Danijela & Pecina, Ena & Orsag, Silvije, 2017. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices In Listed Croatian Companies," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 8(3), pages 219-230.
    3. Philipp Lechner & Nadine Gatzert, 2018. "Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: empirical evidence from Germany," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 867-887, July.
    4. Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally & Ahmed Diab, 2022. "An institutional analysis of the risk management process during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from an emerging market," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 40-62, April.
    5. Mark Farrell & Ronan Gallagher, 2015. "The Valuation Implications of Enterprise Risk Management Maturity," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 82(3), pages 625-657, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivana Dvorski Lacković & Nataša Kurnoga & Danijela Miloš Sprčić, 2022. "Three-factor model of Enterprise Risk Management implementation: exploratory study of non-financial companies," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 101-122, June.
    2. Songling Yang & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance, the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage and the Moderating Role of Financial Literacy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    4. Doureige J. Jurdi & Sam M. AlGhnaimat, 2021. "The Effects of ERM Adoption on European Insurance Firms Performance and Risks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Hussein Alkhyyoon & Mohammad Reza Abbaszadeh & Farzaneh Nassir Zadeh, 2023. "Organizational Risk Management and Performance from the Perspective of Fraud: A Comparative Study in Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Rami Shaheen & Mehmet Ağa & Husam Rjoub & Ahmad Abualrub, 2020. "Investigation of the Pillars of Sustainability Risk Management as an Extension of Enterprise Risk Management on Palestinian Insurance Firms’ Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu, 2020. "Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Kun Wang & Bing Chen & Yuhong Li, 2024. "Technological, process or managerial innovation? How does digital transformation affect green innovation in industrial enterprises?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-32, February.
    9. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Brillinger, Anne-Sophie & Els, Christian & Schäfer, Björn & Bender, Beate, 2020. "Business model risk and uncertainty factors: Toward building and maintaining profitable and sustainable business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 121-130.
    11. Heidinger, Dinah & Gatzert, Nadine, 2018. "Awareness, determinants and value of reputation risk management: Empirical evidence from the banking and insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 106-118.
    12. Don Pagach & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2020. "The Challenges and Opportunities for ERM Post-COVID-19: Agendas for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Gerda Zigiene & Egidijus Rybakovas & Rimgaile Vaitkiene, 2020. "Challenges in Applying Artificial Intelligence for Supply Chain Risk Management," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 299-318.
    14. Evan M. Eastman & Jianren Xu, 2021. "Market reactions to enterprise risk management adoption, incorporation by rating agencies, and ORSA Act passage," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 151-180, June.
    15. Ena Pecina & Danijela Miloš Sprčić & Ivana Dvorski Lacković, 2022. "Qualitative Analysis of Enterprise Risk Management Systems in the Largest European Electric Power Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Alexis Catanzaro & Christine Teyssier, 2021. "Export promotion programs, export capabilities, and risk management practices of internationalized SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1479-1503, October.
    17. Ben Kajwang, 2022. "Theoretical review of enterprise risk management culture drivers for insurance firms in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(5), pages 210-217, July.
    18. Quan Xiao & Shanshan Wan & Fucai Lu & Shun Li, 2019. "Risk Assessment for Engagement in Sharing Economy of Manufacturing Enterprises: A Matter–Element Extension Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-29, September.
    19. Simon Ashby & Trevor Buck & Stephanie Nöth-Zahn & Thomas Peisl, 2018. "Emerging IT Risks: Insights from German Banking," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(2), pages 180-207, April.
    20. Zhiguo Zeng & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio & Rui Kang, 2017. "A hierarchical decision-making framework for the assessment of the prediction capability of prognostic methods," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(1), pages 36-52, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.