IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2014i1p276-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study Between Traditional And Enterprise Risk Management -A Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Cican Simona-Iulia

    (Facultatea de Economie si de Administrare a Afacerilor, Universitatea de Vest din Timisoara,)

Abstract

The complexity, volatility and unpredictability of the current economic environment are a daily reminder that organizations face many risks. The traditional approach, according to which risk is a necessary evil which must be removed, is no longer sufficient and that is why companies nowadays are forced to spend significant resources to manage risks. Risk transparency is what one looks for; therefore, identification and management of risks within an organization become increasingly necessary for success and longevity. Risk approach has a major role in a company's ability to avoid, reduce and turn risks into opportunities. Enterprise risk management is a new concept that revolutionizes the traditional approach and summarizes risk management in an integrated, comprehensive and strategic system. Studies use several synonyms for enterprise risk management such as integrated risk management, holistic risk management, global risk management and strategic risk management. Enterprise risk management implements at the end of the last century a new way to deal with risks: the holistic approach. This risks approach - i.e. interaction of several types of risks which become increasingly threatening and varied and may cause more damage than individual risk - brings forward the need of risk management and raises issues at the highest level of company management. For a proper view on company risks, each individual risk and the possibility of risk interaction must be understood. This is essential to establish a risk classification according to their impact on the company. Traditional approach on risk management, as a management function, is limited to only threats and losses, so relatively few organizations see risks as potential earning-generated opportunities. However, risk management process is not radically changed. Enterprise risk management is an improved version of the traditional risk management, created by expanding its scope. The new risk management model, adapted to the complexity of current economic situation confers a global vision to prepare the organization to face the adverse effect of any event or series of events. Identification and understanding the risk nature is a factor that must be known by all company personnel because an effective risk management minimizes the adverse impact on the organization, i.e. reducing losses and eliminating the danger of bankruptcy.

Suggested Citation

  • Cican Simona-Iulia, 2014. "Comparative Study Between Traditional And Enterprise Risk Management -A Theoretical Approach," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 276-282, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:276-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n1/029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minela Nuhic-Meskovic & Admir Meskovic, 2023. "Risk Management Culture, Structure, and Process: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Evidence," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(10), pages 1-10, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk; management; traditional risk management; enterprise risk management; risk analysis; risk assessment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
    • D00 - Microeconomics - - General - - - General
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:276-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.