IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v10y2018i3p42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study to Determine the Occupational Stress Level and Professional Burnout in Special School Teachers Working in Private and Government Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Doss
  • J. Joyce Rachel
  • Mu'taman Jarrar
  • Mahdi S AbuMadini
  • Muhil Sakthivel

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE- Healthy work environment is required to provide high quality teaching. Few studies regarding occupational stress and burnout in Indian schools have been conducted. The study aims to determine and compare the occupational stress level and professional burnout in teachers working in private and government schools. 120 private school teachers and 120 government school teachers recruited for this study.METHODS- Chi square test, Student independent t test and ANOVA used for data analysis have been used.RESULTS- Stress level and burnout level are varies significantly between male and female Indian school. (Chi square value 26.27 and p Value 0.001 in male and chi square value 38.06 and p value 0.001 in female). Government schools (Least Likely 5±0.0, More Likely 10.82±1.99, Most Prone Stress 16.15 ±1.84 have significant difference among them) have higher stress level than Private schools (Least Likely 4.00±1.41, More Likely 9.86±2.29, Most Prone Stress 15.66±1.34 have significant difference among them). Governmental schools having more stress (14.33±3.24) compare to Private schools (13.34±3.51), (t=2.26, p =0.023). Similarly the burnout also having the more in government schools (59.43±11.78) compare to private schools (48.61±11.94), (t=7.07, p=0.001).CONCLUSIONS- The government teachers have more occupational stress compared to the private school teachers in India. Leaders and decision makers required to make early identification and counseling about different factors that influence stress level in private and Government school teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Doss & J. Joyce Rachel & Mu'taman Jarrar & Mahdi S AbuMadini & Muhil Sakthivel, 2018. "A Comparative Study to Determine the Occupational Stress Level and Professional Burnout in Special School Teachers Working in Private and Government Schools," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-42, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/72575/40219
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/72575
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabi S. Bhagat & Pamela K. Steverson & James C. Segovis, 2007. "International and Cultural Variations in Employee Assistance Programmes: Implications for Managerial Health and Effectiveness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 222-242, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beer, Oliver W.J. & Phillips, Rebecca & Letson, Megan M. & Wolf, Kathryn G., 2021. "Personal and professional impacts of work-related stress alleviation strategies among child welfare workers in child advocacy center settings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Yen-chen Hsu & Ching-wen Wang & Jun-bang Lan, 2020. "Evaluating the performance of employee assistance programs (EAP): a checklist developed from a large sample of public agencies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 935-955, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.