IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v6y2013i6p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saudi English-Major Undergraduates' Academic Writing Problems: A Taif University Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ali Al-Khairy

Abstract

This study attempted to investigate Saudi English-major undergraduates studying at Taif University to identify a) the types of academic writing Saudi English-major undergraduates carry out at English departments, b) Saudi English-major undergraduates' writing problems, c) the reasons behind Saudi English-major undergraduates' writing problems and d) the solutions to overcome Saudi English-major undergraduates' writing problems. To collect data for this purpose, senior faculty members were interviewed and a 32-item structured Likert-scale questionnaire was developed that was administered to 75 English-major students (sophomores, juniors & seniors) studying at foreign languages department, Taif University. Data generated through the questionnaire were subjected to descriptive analyses and mean and standard deviation were recorded using SPSS. The findings of this study reveal that Saudi English-major undergraduates are very weak in writing skills and commit lots of errors in their academic writings and are usually engaged in sentence-level or at the maximum at paragraph-level academic writing and they do not consider it important at this level to write different kinds of essays. It has been strongly recommended that the language courses should be increased to strengthen all the language skills in general and writing in particular, motivate the students to use English with the teachers as well as with each, introduce modern and novel teaching techniques, equip the classrooms with necessary audio-visual aids, diagnose students’ writing problems in the beginning of their studies at university, tailor the course contents according to their needs, introduce group/pair work, peer correction, use dictionaries frequently etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ali Al-Khairy, 2013. "Saudi English-Major Undergraduates' Academic Writing Problems: A Taif University Perspective," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(6), pages 1-1, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:6:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/27256/16549
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/27256
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Sadig Ezza, 2010. "Arab EFL Learners’ Writing Dilemma at Tertiary Level," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(4), pages 1-33, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feifei Wang & Xiaohui Geng & Jiying Han, 2024. "Chinese university EFL learners’ English for General Academic Purposes: relationships between target needs and self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Mark Anthony A. Briz & Rudyard D. Ladesma & Lhester Jay C. Selgas & Rica M. Ybañez, 2022. "Unveiling English Language Learners’ Challenges in Conducting Language Research: A Phenomenological Study," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(11), pages 822-830, November.
    3. Iman Oraif, 2016. "The Right Approach in Practice: A Discussion of the Applicability of EFL Writing Practices in a Saudi Context," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(7), pages 1-97, July.
    4. Ina Suryani & H. Kamaruddin & Noor Hashima & Aizan Yaacob & Salleh Abd Rashid & Hazry Desa, 2014. "Rhetorical Structures in Academic Research Writing by Non- Native Writers," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-29, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdullah Al Abri, 2021. "Exploring EFL Learners’ Comments on Web-Based Peer Feedback: Local and Global Revisions," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 114-114, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:6:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.