IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v14y2021i5p13.html

Japanese University Students’ Perceptions of Foreign English Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Soyhan Egitim
  • Travis Garcia

Abstract

This study aims to understand Japanese university students’ perceptions of foreign English teachers (FETs) through a two-phased exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. During the initial phase, a quantitative survey was performed with first and second-year Japanese university students (n=377). Despite a lack of precision and a high dispersion measure, the Quantitative data analysis revealed certain outliers. A significant number of participants viewed their FETs as more of an entertainer, preferred FETs of American/European heritage, and believed FETs of Asian descent may not be able to teach the language and culture as effectively as FETs of American/European heritage. Thus, a qualitative inquiry was performed to explain and build upon the quantitative findings. Two focus groups with students from the quantitative survey were given interviews. The responses confirmed the existence of phenotypical, gender, and personality FET stereotypes in Japanese university EFL classes. In addition, past educational experiences, socio-cultural factors, and mass media were also found influential in students’ perceptions of FETs. Based on the findings from the focus group interviews, the researchers propose intercultural activities as an effective pedagogical strategy to promote reflective teaching practices and intercultural competence in Japanese university EFL classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Soyhan Egitim & Travis Garcia, 2021. "Japanese University Students’ Perceptions of Foreign English Teachers," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/45070/48213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/45070
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Walkinshaw & Duongthi Hoang Oanh, 2014. "Native and Non-Native English Language Teachers," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prodhan Mahbub Ibna Seraj & Blanka Klimova & Rubina Khan, 2024. "Visualizing Research Trends in English Language Teaching (ELT) From 2013 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    2. Kim Hua Tan & Michelle Elaine anak William Jospa & Nur-Ehsan Mohd-Said & Mohd Mahzan Awang, 2021. "Speak like a Native English Speaker or Be Judged: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Merav Badash & Efrat Harel & Rivi Carmel & Tina Waldman, 2020. "Beliefs versus Declared Practices of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Teachers Regarding Teaching Grammar," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-49, March.
    4. Emrah Ekmekci, 2016. "Comparison of Native and Non-native English Language Teachers’ Evaluation of EFL Learners’ Speaking Skills: Conflicting or Identical Rating Behaviour?," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 1-98, May.
    5. Pham Cu Thien & Tran Thi Thanh Tuyen & Huynh Cong Minh Hung, 2018. "Students’ perception of the advantages and disadvantages of learning English for biology with native and non-native English-speaking teachers," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 8(2), pages 3-13.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.