IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v14y2021i1p29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EFL Female Students’ Perceptions towards Cheating in Distance Learning Programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa Mamoun Saleh
  • Zilal Meccawy

Abstract

Distance education is becoming more in demand at universities all around the world in general and in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) in particular, than ever before. This study aimed at highlighting the students’ perceptions of cheating on a distance learning programme at King Abdulaziz University (KAU). The study will further explore the ways they use to cheat, causes for cheating, and some solutions to minimize cheating. This study was conducted at the end of the second semester in 2019. Data was collected from 57 female distance learning students who graduated from the English Language Department at KAU. A mixed-methods research design was adopted in this study via a custom designed, fifteen closed-ended and one open-ended item questionnaire. The quantitative section was analysed by frequency and percentages and the open-ended questions were analysed thematically. The results indicated that the majority of female students cheated by helping each other, obtaining the correct answers from other students or sending the correct responses to all their classmates. Another way which some students admitted they employed was using electronic websites to copy and paste the answers onto the test’s screen. The study further concluded that reasons for cheating in distance learning programs were due to technical problems, frequent absence of virtual classes, and students wanting grades, not necessarily knowledge. Recommendations for possible solutions to eliminate cheating, participants themselves recommended increasing students’ awareness of cheating policy and finding solutions to common technological issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa Mamoun Saleh & Zilal Meccawy, 2021. "EFL Female Students’ Perceptions towards Cheating in Distance Learning Programmes," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/44365/46813
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/44365
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golden, Joanna & Kohlbeck, Mark, 2020. "Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online Classes," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elma Fe E. Gupit & Jose F. Cuevas Jr., 2023. "Academic Dishonesty in the Digital Era: A Case Study," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(3), pages 864-874, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelum A. A. Gamage & Roshan G. G. R. Pradeep & Erandika K. de Silva, 2022. "Rethinking Assessment: The Future of Examinations in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M., 2021. "Accounting education literature review (2020)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Bayne, Lyndie & Birt, Jacqueline & Hancock, Phil & Schonfeldt, Nikki & Agrawal, Prerana, 2022. "Best practices for group assessment tasks," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.