IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iag/reviea/v16y2019i1p77-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Agricultural Systems: Conventional Agriculture Versus Ecological Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Ana URSU

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romanian Academy, Bucharest and Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences “Gheorghe Ionescu Sisesti”, Bucharest)

Abstract

Developing production systems that integrate the benefits of the conventional agricultural system and the benefits of the organic farming system are needed to create a more sustainable future for agriculture. The organic farming system is perceived as a system that provides solutions to the problems faced by the agricultural sector: increasing sustainability, biodiversity, improving soil and air quality, etc. Romania has responded to these benefits by encouraging farmers to adopt environmentally friendly farming practices, financial incentives (in addition to direct payment schemes, payments under Measure 11 – Organic Farming). The paper presents some estimates of the evolution of incomes, costs and profitability of agricultural products for the period 2015–2018 under conventional and organic farming conditions. From the results it is deduced that farmers who have gone into organic farming can earn incomes equal to their conventional or even higher. The studies made in this paper contribute to a deeper knowledge of the two systems of agriculture in general and to the economic knowledge of conventional farming versus the economy of organic farming in particular. Although in recent years the interest in organic farming has increased, it can be noticed that there is a small amount of accessible information on yields, costs and profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana URSU, 2019. "Competitive Agricultural Systems: Conventional Agriculture Versus Ecological Agriculture," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 77-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:iag:reviea:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:77-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eadr.ro/RePEc/iag/iag_pdf/AERD1901_77-90.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Kumara Charyulu & Subho Biswas, 2010. "Economics and Efficiency of Organic Farming vis-Ã -vis Conventional Farming in India," Working Papers id:2497, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karthikeyan Mariappan & Deyi Zhou, 2019. "A Threat of Farmers’ Suicide and the Opportunity in Organic Farming for Sustainable Agricultural Development in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. K.S. Kavi Kumar & Kamal Karunagoda & Enamul Haque & L. Venkatachelam & Girish Nath Bahal, 2012. "Addressing Long-term Challenges to Food Security and Rural Livelihoods in South Asia," Working Papers 2012-075, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    3. Jan Buczek & Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek & Elżbieta Harasim & Cezary A. Kwiatkowski & Ireneusz Kapusta, 2023. "Effect of Cropping Systems and Environment on Phenolic Acid Profiles and Yielding of Hybrid Winter Wheat Genotypes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Djokoto, Justice G., 2015. "Technical efficiency of organic agriculture: a quantitative review," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 117(2), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Singh, S.P. & Sajwan, Priya & Sajwan, Komal, 2023. "Technical Efficiency in Organic and Conventional Wheat Farms: Evidence from a Primary Survey from Two Districts of Ganga River Basin, India," 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 334558, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    conventional agricultural economy; organic farming economy; incomes; expenditures; profitability.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • P50 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - General
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iag:reviea:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:77-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaacaro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.