IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2025i1p135-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Cost-Effective and Affordable Medical Solutions Using the Design Thinking Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Abena Engmann

    (Academic City University College, Accra, Ghana)

  • AMammie Hutchful Nortey

    (University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana)

  • Collins C Ngwakwe

    (University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa)

Abstract

Nowadays, healthcare innovation is the main tool that improves the provision of medical care in developing countries, especially in countries with low resources. This research case presents the innovation journey of Goliath Robotics, a startup company in sub-Saharan Africa, specifically Ghana that operates in the health space and produces electric wheelchairs. The case focuses on three theories, particularly the resource-based view, effectuation theory and the bottom of the pyramid integrated with the design thinking process to show how these theories can be applied together in a business model to achieve affordability, accessibility and sustainability. The co-founders not only strive to source raw materials themselves but also fill in skills gaps required to produce the wheelchairs, as well as overcome a bevvy of technical hurdles in their startup journey. The research aims to bridge the literature gap regarding entrepreneurs producing affordable health solutions using the design thinking approach in underserved markets. It also delves into the importance of involving various stakeholders in developing solutions. The paper applied a case study approach. Data was collected using interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and data analyzed interpretively. The study results show that integrating these theories creates a comprehensive framework for guiding innovation in healthcare delivery and the end user's involvement at the base of the pyramid to develop appropriate, cost-effective solutions. By integrating these theories, entrepreneurs and firms can use design thinking to identify opportunities to serve low-income populations, leverage local, available and affordable resources and internal capabilities, make effective decisions and adapt to uncertainty. Researchers can test this framework in other markets or developing countries for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Abena Engmann & AMammie Hutchful Nortey & Collins C Ngwakwe, 2025. "Building Cost-Effective and Affordable Medical Solutions Using the Design Thinking Approach," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 135-143, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:1:p:135-143
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2025-1(107)-135-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/1133-stvorennya-ekonomichno-efektivnih.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/1133/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2025-1(107)-135-143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneurship; innovation; health; resource constraint; co-creation; design thinking;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • O36 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Open Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:1:p:135-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.