IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2021i4p62-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsible Land-Based Investment in Ukraine: International Regulatory Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Sergii Borodin

    (Federation of Auditors, Accountants and Finansiers of AIC of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

In 2021, a free agricultural land market was opened in Ukraine. So, an increase in investments in the acquisition of agricultural land in Ukraine is expected, which actualizes social problems, particularly guaranteeing the rights of peasants, small producers and small farmers, vulnerable groups of the population, women, and rural youth to own and use land. The risks of land investments for the Ukrainian economy are associated with the loss of a small landowner, the displacement of the farming system, an increase in rural unemployment, violation of the rights of rural communities, and the destruction of the rural living environment. The purpose of the study is to substantiate recommendations for Ukraine based on an analysis of international experience in regulating the processes of attracting responsible land investment and highlighting the basic principles of responsible investment in agriculture and food systems. The main international documents on responsible investments in the implementation of large-scale land projects were analyzed. It has been established that foreign investment in land tenure and land use in Ukraine is associated with high demand due to the availability of supply of agricultural land and the opening of a land sale and purchase market, the transformation of natural resources into commercial assets, a corruption component, and uncertainty with the value of the land. The necessity of the following steps has been substantiated: ) development of recommendations for responsible investment in land tenure and land use; b) introduction of the concept of "responsible land investment" into the national legislative field; c) development of a system for regulating investment activity based on international standards. The author suggested recognizing family farmers, small owners, and small producers, especially women, rural youth, rural residents, as the main responsible investors in the field of land use in Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergii Borodin, 2021. "Responsible Land-Based Investment in Ukraine: International Regulatory Practice," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 62-70, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:62-70
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2021-4(94)-62-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/869-vidpovidalni-investicii-u-zemlevolodinnya-ta-zemlekoristuvannya-v-ukraini-mizhnarodna-praktika-regulyuvannya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/869/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2021-4(94)-62-70?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Edelman & Carlos Oya & Saturnino M Borras, 2013. "Global Land Grabs: historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1517-1531, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bennett, Nathan James & Govan, Hugh & Satterfield, Terre, 2015. "Ocean grabbing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 61-68.
      • Wehner, Nicholas & Bennett, Nathan & Govan, Hugh & Satterfield, Terre, 2015. "Ocean grabbing," MarXiv bm6pf, Center for Open Science.
    2. Rulli, Maria Cristina & Casirati, Stefano & Dell’Angelo, Jampel & Davis, Kyle Frankel & Passera, Corrado & D’Odorico, Paolo, 2019. "Interdependencies and telecoupling of oil palm expansion at the expense of Indonesian rainforest," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 499-512.
    3. Nolte, Kerstin & Voget-Kleschin, Lieske, 2014. "Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: An Evaluation of Three Cases in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 654-668.
    4. Chilombo, Andrew & Fisher, Janet A. & van Der Horst, Dan, 2019. "A conceptual framework for improving the understanding of large scale land acquisitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Dereje Teklemariam & Hossein Azadi & Jan Nyssen & Mitiku Haile & Frank Witlox, 2016. "How Sustainable Is Transnational Farmland Acquisition in Ethiopia? Lessons Learned from the Benishangul-Gumuz Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Wayessa, Gutu Olana, 2020. "Impacts of land leases in Oromia, Ethiopia: Changes in access to livelihood resources for local people," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Borras, Saturnino M. & Franco, Jennifer C. & Moreda, Tsegaye & Xu, Yunan & Bruna, Natacha & Afewerk Demena, Binyam, 2022. "The value of so-called ‘failed’ large-scale land acquisitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Dazhuan Ge & Hualou Long & Li Ma & Yingnan Zhang & Shuangshuang Tu, 2017. "Analysis Framework of China’s Grain Production System: A Spatial Resilience Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Uson, M., 2015. "Grabbing the 'clean slate' : The politics of the intersection of land grabbing, disasters and climate change," ISS Working Papers - General Series 603, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    10. Anthony Bebbington & Denise Humphreys Bebbington, 2018. "Mining, movements and sustainable development: Concepts for a framework," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 441-449, September.
    11. O. P. Fadeeva & V. I. Nefedkin, 2021. "Agrarian Land Use in Russia Under Digitalization Conditions: Case Study of Altai Krai," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 387-395, July.
    12. Ole Busck & Johannes Dragsbaek Schmidt, 2020. "Development, Ecology and Climate Change: Resistance by the Peasantry," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 9-31, January.
    13. Tamura, Yu, 2021. "Contexts behind differentiated responses to contract farming and large-scale land acquisitions in Central Mozambique: Post-war experiences, social relations, and power balance of local authorities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Mariko L. Frame, 2022. "Ecological Imperialism: A World‐Systems Approach," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(3), pages 503-534, May.
    15. Mohammed B. Degnet & Edwin van der Werf & Verina Ingram & Justus Wesseler, 2017. "Private Capital, Public Goods: Forest Plantations' Investment in Local Infrastructure and Social Services in Rural Tanzania," CESifo Working Paper Series 6690, CESifo.
    16. Viesturs Jānis & Auziņš Armands & Štaube Tatjana, 2017. "Arguments Used for Restricting International Real Property Transactions: Case Study of Latvia," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 62-75, November.
    17. Tola Gemechu Ango, 2018. "“Medium-Scale” Forestland Grabbing in the Southwestern Highlands of Ethiopia: Impacts on Local Livelihoods and Forest Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Manjusha Nair, 2020. "Land as a Transactional Asset: Moral Economy and Market Logic in Contested Land Acquisition in India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(6), pages 1511-1532, November.
    19. Littleboy, Chris, 2022. "A study of scarcity: assessing the availability and value of surplus land in Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    20. Olana Wayessa, Gutu, 2022. "Environmental (in)justices of land leases in Ethiopia: Premises, promises, and lived realities," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    land market; land tenure and land use; land grabbing; responsible land-based investment; land investment risks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:62-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.