IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iab/iabmit/v31i3p599-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innerbetriebliches Vertrauen als Verbreitungsgrenze atypischer Beschäftigungsformen (Trust within enterprises as a limit to the spread of atypical employment forms)

Author

Listed:
  • Seifert, Matthias
  • Pawlowsky, Peter

Abstract

"What makes atypical employment forms attractive from the point of view of enterprises is the personnel-policy leeway that they provide with regard to working hours, remuneration or continuity of employment. In particular company-internal social relations based on trust are important for the ability of enterprises to make innovation and change, because trust increases workers' willingness for commitment and co-operation and promotes the diffusion of knowledge within the organisation. According to the thesis, the production factor of trust sets relatively narrow limits to the spreading of atypical forms of employment, since the establishment and strengthening of trust in organisations is strongly influenced by subjectively perceived employment and labour market prospects. Where individual job insecurity is perceived, a climate of mistrust prevails which is accompanied by an activation of non-co-operative behaviour among the employees. Although atypical forms of employment do not generally result in a loss of trust, fixed-term employment and temporary agency work, owing to their temporary character, can not bring about stable and lasting relations of trust between employers and employees. Thus the business-management interest in a maximum flexibility of the staff depending on the order situation conflicts with the interest in the workers' demonstrating a high level of willingness for performance and productivity. The latter requires the workers' trust and can best be achieved in stable and permanent regular full-time jobs with a relative employment 'guarantee'. For this reason for many enterprises maximum staff flexibility is not synonymous with optimum flexibility." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Suggested Citation

  • Seifert, Matthias & Pawlowsky, Peter, 1998. "Innerbetriebliches Vertrauen als Verbreitungsgrenze atypischer Beschäftigungsformen (Trust within enterprises as a limit to the spread of atypical employment forms)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 31(3), pages 599-611.
  • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabmit:v:31:i:3:p:599-611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doku.iab.de/mittab/1998/1998_3_MittAB_Seifert_Pawlowsky.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirschman, Albert O., 1985. "Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating some Categories of Economic Discourse," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 7-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janvier D. Nkurunziza, 2005. "Reputation and Credit without Collateral in Africa`s Formal Banking," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2005-02, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. Rita Canu & Giuseppe Tattara, 2005. "Quando le farfalle mettono le ali. Osservazioni sull'ingresso delle donne nel lavoro dipendente," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 2, pages 1-67.
    3. van Hoorn, André, 2018. "Is the happiness approach to measuring preferences valid?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 53-65.
    4. Saba Siddiki & Xavier Basurto & Christopher M. Weible, 2012. "Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance: The case of Colorado aquaculture," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 167-188, June.
    5. Rojhat Avsar, 2021. "Rational Emotions: An Evolutionary Perspective," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 297-314, July.
    6. Vipul Bhatt & Masao Ogaki & Yuichi Yaguchi, 2017. "Introducing Virtue Ethics into Normative Economics for Models with Endogenous Preferences," RCER Working Papers 600, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    7. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b39 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Aspasia Tsaoussi & Eleni Zervogianni, 2010. "Judges as satisficers: a law and economics perspective on judicial liability," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 333-357, June.
    9. Giandomenica Becchio, 2020. "The Two Blades of Occam's Razor in Economics: Logical and Heuristic," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Grossmann, Volker, 2002. "Is it rational to internalize the personal norm that one should reciprocate?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 27-48, February.
    11. Andrew Yuengert, 2006. "Model selection and multiple research goals: The case of rational addiction," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 77-96.
    12. Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Gangadharan, Lata & Maitra, Pushkar & Mani, Subha, 2017. "Searching for preference stability in a state dependent world," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 17-32.
    13. Bachmann, R., 2002. "Trust and power as means of co-ordinating the internal relations of the organization : a conceptual framework," Research Report 02G10, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    14. Seifert, Matthias & Pawlowsky, Peter, 1998. "Innerbetriebliches Vertrauen als Verbreitungsgrenze atypischer Beschäftigungsformen (Trust within enterprises as a limit to the spread of atypical employment forms)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 31(3), pages 599-611.
    15. Jimena Hurtado, 2005. "The Utilitarian Foundations Of The Economic Approach To Human Behavior," Documentos CEDE 3633, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    16. Milan Zafirovski, 2020. "Indicators of Militarism and Democracy in Comparative Context: How Militaristic Tendencies Influence Democratic Processes in OECD Countries 2010–2016," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 159-202, January.
    17. Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Gangadharan, Lata & Maitra, Pushkar & Mani, Subha, 2014. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum: An Experimental Investigation," MPRA Paper 58010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Elena Granaglia, 2009. "The Homo Oeconomicus Paradigm and the Design of Public Policies. Some Underrated Issues," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 1, March.
    19. Chad M. Baum & Christian Gross, 2017. "Sustainability policy as if people mattered: developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 53-95, April.
    20. Robert Mosch & Henriëtte Prast, 2008. "Confidence and trust: empirical investigations for the Netherlands and the financial sector," DNB Occasional Studies 602, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    21. van Hoorn, Andre, 2016. "Reliability and Validity of the Happiness Approach to Measuring Preferences," MPRA Paper 79977, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabmit:v:31:i:3:p:599-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.