IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v5y2011i4p8-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy 2020: New Outlines of Russian Innovation Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Leonid Gokhberg

    (Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Tatyana Kuznetsova

    (Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

The paper presents the outcomes of the expert group “The transition from fostering innovation to innovation-based growth” on adjusting the Strategy for socio-economic development of Russia up to 2020. Panel experts have undertaken a detailed analysis of the state of art of the Russian innovation sphere and proposed recommendations on the choice of strategic priorities for state policy, as well as specific regulatory tools that can be implemented in the near future. Among the key challenges identified are: the increasing Russian dependence on foreign markets, the growing socio-economic risks, difficulties with adequate responding to the rapidly changing global trends, significant gaps between the main actors of the innovation system, sufficient lack of access to new technologies and innovations for different social groups. The most significant positive trends include: the introduction of new regulatory tools, the gradual expansion of the actors players in the innovation sector and, the growth of public R&D funding. The experts propose three possible scenarios: the inertial scenario implies low rates of economic growth while preserving the dependence of the economy on extractive industries; the progressive scenario presumes the accelerated integration into global processes and transition to post-industrial model and the moderate scenario which has the highest probability of realization. The implementation of a scenario depends on political choices made in the context of bifurcation in areas such as legislation, regulation, science, and many others. For example, in education there is a need to choose between “soft” adaptation of existing educational programs to meet the changing needs of the economy and greater emphasis on the development of specific professional skills. The paper formulates the basic directions of a prospective innovation policy: shifting from focusing on support for individual innovative projects that meet tight technology priorities to fostering mass innovation in all sectors of the economy, including low-tech ones; sectoral differentiation of the priorities, criteria, policy instruments, balanced support for innovation in high- and low-tech sectors, the rejection of a rigid hierarchy in the governance in favor of decentralization, empowerment of regions, development institutions, business associations and other entities with more power; support for network cooperation at all levels, focusing on an output-oriented approach to decision making, ensuring the balance of thematic and functional priority policies in order to eliminate possible failures in the innovation cycle. The authors put emphasis on the social effects of innovation policy, the need for supporting the creative class as well as the training of entrepreneurs, managers and professionals for the innovation sector and the economy as a whole. Note: Downloadable document is in Russian.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonid Gokhberg & Tatyana Kuznetsova, 2011. "Strategy 2020: New Outlines of Russian Innovation Policy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 8-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:4:p:8-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2013/02/20/1306869797/1-Strategy2020-8-30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonid Gokhberg & Irina Kouznetsova, 2009. "Innovation in the Russian Economy: Stagnation before Crisis?," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 28-46.
    2. Alexander Apokin & Dmitry Belousov, 2009. "Scenarios of the Global and Russian Economic Development as a Basis for S&T Forecasting," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 3(3), pages 12-29.
    3. Leonid Gokhberg & Tatyana Kuznetsova & Vitaly Roud, 2010. "Analysis of Innovation Modes in the Russian Economy: Methodological Approaches and First Results," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 4(3), pages 18-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fred Gault, 2019. "User Innovation in the Digital Economy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 6-12.
    2. Alexander Sokolov & Alexander Chulok, 2012. "Russian Science and Technology Foresight – 2030: Key Features and First Results," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 12-25.
    3. Ozcan Saritas & Leonid Gokhberg & Pavel Bakhtin & Ilya F. Kuzminov, 2016. "Weak Signals on the Future of Mobile Commerce in Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 68/STI/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Stepan Zemtsov & Alexander Muradov & Imogen Wade & Vera Barinova, 2016. "Determinants of Regional Innovation in Russia: Are People or Capital More Important?," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(2 (eng)), pages 29-42.
    5. Luigi Aldieri & Maxim Nikolaevich Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2018. "Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2111-2132, September.
    6. Simachev, Yuri & Kuzyk, Mikhail & Ivanov, Denis, 2012. "Fostering innovation in Russian companies in the post-crisis period: Opportunities and constraints," MPRA Paper 41284, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Gershman, Mikhail & Bredikhin, Sergey & Vishnevskiy, Konstantin, 2016. "The role of corporate foresight and technology roadmapping in companies' innovation development: The case of Russian state-owned enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 187-195.
    8. Alexander Sokolov & Alexander Chulok & Vladimir Mesropyan, 2013. "Long-Term Science and Technology Policy – Russian priorities for 2030," HSE Working papers WP BRP 19/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Maxim Kotsemir & Tatiana Kuznetsova & Elena Nasybulina & Anna Pikalova, 2015. "Identifying Directions for Russia’s Science and Technology Cooperation," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 54-72.
      • Maxim Kotsemir & Tatiana Kuznetsova & Elena Nasybulina & Anna Pikalova, 2015. "Identifying Directions for Russia’s Science and Technology Cooperation," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 9(4 (eng)), pages 54-72.
    10. Leonid Gokhberg & Galina Kitova & Vitaliy Roud, 2014. "Tax Incentives for R&D and Innovation: Demand versus Effects," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 18-41.
      • Leonid Gokhberg & Galina Kitova & Vitaliy Roud, 2014. "Tax incentives for r&d and innovation: demand versus effects," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(3 (eng)), pages 18-41.
    11. Mikhail Gershman & Tatiana Kuznetsova, 2012. "Specificities of Involving Small Enterprises into International S&T Co-operation: Evidence from the Linkages between Russia and Germany," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(3), pages 51-61.
    12. Mikhail Gershman & Tatiana Kuznetsova, 2013. "Efficient Contract in the R&D Sector: Key Parameters," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 26-36.
    13. repec:hig:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:12-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. NATALYA Udaltsova & Н. Удальцова Л., 2016. "Системные Проблемы И Угрозы Национальной Инновационной Системе России // Systemic Problems And Threats To The National Innovation System Of Russia," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 9(3), pages 113-119.
    15. Denis Ivanov & Mikhail Kuzyk & Yury Simachev, 2012. "Fostering Innovation Performance of Russian Manufacturing Enterprises: New Opportunities and Limitations," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 18-42.
    16. Mikhail Gershman, 2012. "New challenges for STI policy from the internationalization of R&D: the case of Russian-German R&D cooperation," HSE Working papers WP BRP 02/STI/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    17. Natalia Shmatko, 2012. "Competences of Engineers. Evidence from a Comparative Study for Russia and EU Countries," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(4), pages 32-47.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonid Gokhberg & Tatiana Kuznetsova & Vitaly Roud, 2012. "Exploring innovation modes of Russian companies: what does the diversity of actors mean for policymaking?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 01/STI/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Alexander Sokolov & Alexander Chulok, 2012. "Russian Science and Technology Foresight – 2030: Key Features and First Results," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 12-25.
    3. Natalia Shmatko, 2013. "Graduates’ Competencies For The Innovation Labour Market," HSE Working papers WP BRP 13/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Ian Miles & Veronika Belousova & Nikolay Chichkanov, 2017. "Innovation Configurations in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 94-102.
    5. Dirk Meissner & Maxim Kotsemir, 2016. "Conceptualizing the innovation process towards the ‘active innovation paradigm’—trends and outlook," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. K. I. Grasmik, 2018. "Innovation Activity of Russian Industrial Enterprises during Economic Crisis," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 573-580, September.
    7. Mikhail Gershman, 2013. "Innovation Development Programmes for the State-owned Companies: First Results," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 28-43.
    8. Teplykh, Grigorii, 2015. "Drivers of innovation activity of manufacturing enterprises in Russia," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 83-110.
    9. repec:hig:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:12-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Z. A. Mamed’yarov, 2021. "The Role of Interindustry Integration in Economic Growth: Theoretical and Strategic Implications," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 656-661, November.
    11. Stanislav Zaichenko, 2012. "Transferring R&D Outputs to Industry: Strategies of R&D Organizations," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(4), pages 48-58.
    12. Denis Ivanov & Mikhail Kuzyk & Yury Simachev, 2012. "Fostering Innovation Performance of Russian Manufacturing Enterprises: New Opportunities and Limitations," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 18-42.
    13. Mikhail Gershman & Tatiana Kuznetsova, 2012. "Specificities of Involving Small Enterprises into International S&T Co-operation: Evidence from the Linkages between Russia and Germany," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(3), pages 51-61.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    expert group; scenario; innovation strategy; decision-making; innovation policy; innovation performance; incentives for innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:4:p:8-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.