IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/grm/ecoyun/202101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing €Œmissing†(Governance) Pillar Of Sustainability €“ The Case Of Bulgarian Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Hrabrin Bachev

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics)

Abstract

A need to include “the fourth†Governance pillar in the concept for understanding and the assessment system of (overall and) agrarian sustainability is increasingly justified in academic literature and finds place in the frameworks of government, international, private, etc. organizations. In Bulgaria, like in many other countries, practically there are no comprehensive assessments of the governance sustainability of agriculture and its importance for the overall agrarian development. This study tries to fill the gap and suggests a holistic framework for understanding and assessing the governance sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture. The newly elaborated approach is “tested†in a large-scale study for assessing the governance sustainability of country’s agriculture at national, sectoral, regional, eco-system and farm levels. The study has proved that it is important to include the “missing†Governance Pillar in the assessment of the Integral sustainability of agriculture and sustainability of agro-systems of various type. Multiple Principles, Criteria and Indicators assessment of the Governance sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture indicates that the Overall Governance Sustainability is at a “Good†but very close to the “Satisfactory†level. Besides, there is a considerable differentiation in the level of Integral Governance sustainability of different agro-systems in the country. Last but not least important, results on the integral agrarian sustainability assessment based on micro (farm) and macro (statistical, etc.) data show some discrepancies which have to be taken into consideration in the analysis and interpretation, while assessment indicators, methods and data sources further improved. Having in mind the importance of holistic assessments of this kind for improving the agrarian sustainability in general, and the Governance sustainability of agriculture in particular, they are to be expended and their precision and representation increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Hrabrin Bachev, 2021. "Assessing €Œmissing†(Governance) Pillar Of Sustainability €“ The Case Of Bulgarian Agriculture," Economia Coyuntural,Revista de temas de perspectivas y coyuntura, Instituto de Investigaciones Economicas y Sociales 'Jose Ortiz Mercado' (IIES-JOM), Facultad de Ciencias Economicas, Administrativas y Financieras, Universidad Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno, vol. 6(1), pages 1-48.
    • Handle: RePEc:grm:ecoyun:202101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://files.uagrm.edu.bo/entidad/161/file/indexed/repec/grm/ecoyun/202101.pdf
    File Function: Final version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabian Cruz & Yolanda Mena & Vicente Rodriguez-Estevez, 2018. "Methodologies for Assessing Sustainability in Farming Systems," Chapters, in: Soner Gokten & Pinar Okan Gokten (ed.), Sustainability Assessment and Reporting, IntechOpen.
    2. Hrabrin BACHEV & Bodjidar IVANOV & Desislava TOTEVA & Emilia SOKOLOVA, 2016. "Agrarian Sustainability and Its Governance Understanding Evaluation Improvement," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 639-663.
    3. Hrabrin Bachev, 2017. "A Study on Environmental Sustainability of Bulgarian Farming Enterprises," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 6(1), pages 01-15, - October.
    4. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2010. "Governance of agrarian sustainability," MPRA Paper 99867, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Robert B. Gibson, 2006. "Beyond The Pillars: Sustainability Assessment As A Framework For Effective Integration Of Social, Economic And Ecological Considerations In Significant Decision-Making," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 259-280.
    6. Hrabrin BACHEV, 2016. "Defining and Assessing the Governance of Agrarian Sustainability," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 797-816.
    7. Gemma Burford & Elona Hoover & Ismael Velasco & Svatava Janoušková & Alicia Jimenez & Georgia Piggot & Dimity Podger & Marie K. Harder, 2013. "Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-25, July.
    8. H. Bachev, 2017. "Absolute And Comparative Sustainability Of Farming Enterprises In Bulgaria," Вестник Киевского национального университета имени Тараса Шевченко. Экономика., Socionet;Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко, vol. 2(191), pages 6-17.
    9. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:797-816 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Hrabrin Bachev & Bojidar Ivanov & Angel Sarov, 2020. "Unpacking Governance Sustainability of Bulgarian Agriculture," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 106-137.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2020. "Evaluation of governance sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture," MPRA Paper 103478, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2020. "Управленческа Устойчивост На Селското Стопанство В България [Governance sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture]," MPRA Paper 103927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Bachev, Hrabrin & Ivanov, Bojidar & Sarov, Angel, 2020. "Как Да Измерим Управленческата Устойчивост На Българското Селско Стопанство? [How to measure the governance sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture?]," MPRA Paper 103926, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Bachev, Hrabrin & Ivanov, Bojidar & Sarov, Angel, 2019. "Framework for assessing the governance pillar of agrarian sustainability," MPRA Paper 103477, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2021. "Understanding and evaluating the “missing” governance pillar of sustainability – the case of the Bulgarian agriculture," MPRA Paper 106310, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hrabrin Bachev & Bojidar Ivanov & Angel Sarov, 2020. "Unpacking Governance Sustainability of Bulgarian Agriculture," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 106-137.
    7. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2018. "Управление На Аграрната Устойчивост В България [Governance of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria]," MPRA Paper 83686, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. H. Bachev & G. Kharlamova, 2019. "Eco-SystemApproach for Assessing Agrarian Sustainability in Bulgaria," Вестник Киевского национального университета имени Тараса Шевченко. Экономика., Socionet;Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко, vol. 2(203), pages 17-30.
    9. H. Bachev, 2018. "An Empirical Study On Relations Between Governance And Sustainability In Bulgarian Agriculture," Вестник Киевского национального университета имени Тараса Шевченко. Экономика., Socionet;Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко, vol. 3(198), pages 6-29.
    10. Bachev, Hrabrin & Ivanov, Bojidar & Toteva, Dessislava & Sokolova, Emilia, 2021. "Agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria – evaluating economic, social and ecological pillars," MPRA Paper 110263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2018. "Institutions and sustainability – insights from Bulgarian agriculture," MPRA Paper 85682, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Hrabrin Bachev, 2018. "The impact of the institutional environment on agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 3-32,33-60.
    13. Hrabrin Ianouchev BACHEV, 2018. "Impact of governing modeson agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria," Journal of Economic and Social Thought, KSP Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 72-110, March.
    14. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2018. "Efficiency of agrarian governance in Bulgaria," MPRA Paper 85576, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2020. "About the governance pillar of agrarian sustainability," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 32(4), pages 16-27.
    16. Hrabrin Bachev & Bozhidar Ivanov & Emilia Sokolova & Desislava Toteva, 2017. "Agricultural Sustainability in Bulgaria – Levels and Factors," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 6(2), pages 42-51, November.
    17. Hrabrin I. BACHEV & Bozhidar IVANOV & Desislava TOTEVA & Emilia SOKOLOVA, 2017. "Evaluation of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 233-242, September.
    18. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2019. "Multilevel assessment of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria," MPRA Paper 92752, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Hrabrin Bachev, 2021. "Modes of Governance for Ecosystem Services in Bulgarian Farms," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 145-174.
    20. Bachev, Hrabrin & Ivanov, Bojidar & Mitova, Dilyana & Boevski, Ivan & Marinov, Petar & Sarov, Angel & Zvetkova, Daniela & Kostenarov, Krasimir & Vanev, Dimitar, 2021. "Емпирично Изследване На Управлението На Услугите На Агроекосистемите В България [An empirical study of the management of agro-ecosystem services in Bulgaria]," MPRA Paper 105696, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Governance sustainability; assessment; agriculture; agricultural systems; Bulgaria.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:grm:ecoyun:202101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roger Alejandro Banegas Rivero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiagrbo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.