IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i3p401-d92451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of the Low-Carbon Effects of Urban Rail Based on Mode Shifts

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Chen

    (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Rail Transit Line Safety and Disaster Prevention, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Xiaopeng Shen

    (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Zijia Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Rail Transit Line Safety and Disaster Prevention, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Yang Yang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Urban rail is widely considered to be a form of low-carbon green transportation, but there is a lack of specific quantitative research to support this. By comparing the mode, distance, and corresponding energy consumption of residents before and after the opening of rail transit, this paper establishes a carbon reduction method for rail transit. A measurement model takes the passenger carbon emissions before the line is opened as the baseline and compares them with the standard after the opening, determining the carbon emissions reduction. The model requires a combination of a large amount of research data, transit smart card data, and GIS network measurement tools as measured data and parameters. The model is then applied to rail transit lines that have opened in Beijing in recent years. The emissions reductions of four different routes are estimated and the carbon emissions reduction effect of rail transit is evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Chen & Xiaopeng Shen & Zijia Wang & Yang Yang, 2017. "An Evaluation of the Low-Carbon Effects of Urban Rail Based on Mode Shifts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:401-:d:92451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/401/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Simina Lakatos & Viorel Dan & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Laura Bacali & Andreea Maria Ciobanu, 2016. "How Supportive Are Romanian Consumers of the Circular Economy Concept: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Jeng-Wen Lin & Pu Fun Shen & Bing-Jean Lee, 2015. "Repetitive Model Refinement for Questionnaire Design Improvement in the Evaluation of Working Characteristics in Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Na Zhang & Zijia Wang & Feng Chen & Jingni Song & Jianpo Wang & Yu Li, 2020. "Low-Carbon Impact of Urban Rail Transit Based on Passenger Demand Forecast in Baoji," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Xueqiao Yu & Maoxiang Lang & Wenhui Zhang & Shiqi Li & Mingyue Zhang & Xiao Yu, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Comprehensive Optimization Method of a Train Diagram of the China High Speed Railway Express," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Liudan Jiao & Liyin Shen & Chenyang Shuai & Yongtao Tan & Bei He, 2017. "Measuring Crowdedness between Adjacent Stations in an Urban Metro System: a Chinese Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2021. "A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road–rail systems with government intervention," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 272-295.
    5. Xueqiao Yu & Maoxiang Lang & Yang Gao & Kai Wang & Ching-Hsia Su & Sang-Bing Tsai & Mingkun Huo & Xiao Yu & Shiqi Li, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Design of China High-Speed Rail Express Train Operation Plan—From a Sustainable Transport Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Di Wu & Juan Carlos Martín, 2022. "Research on Passengers’ Preference for High-Speed Railways (HSRs) and High-Speed Trains (HSTs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Thanapong Champahom & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2020. "Methodologies for Determining the Service Quality of the Intercity Rail Service Based on Users’ Perceptions and Expectations in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Na Zhang & Zijia Wang & Feng Chen & Jingni Song & Jianpo Wang & Yu Li, 2020. "Low-Carbon Impact of Urban Rail Transit Based on Passenger Demand Forecast in Baoji," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    3. Elena Simina Lakatos & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Viorel Dan & Alina Oana Ciomos & Oana Adriana Crisan & Ghita Barsan, 2018. "Studies and Investigation about the Attitude towards Sustainable Production, Consumption and Waste Generation in Line with Circular Economy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Andrea Szilagyi & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Laura Bacali & Elena-Simina Lakatos & Andreea-Loredana Birgovan, 2022. "Consumers in the Circular Economy: A Path Analysis of the Underlying Factors of Purchasing Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    5. P. Giovani Palafox-Alcantar & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Christopher D. F. Rogers, 2021. "Current and Future Professional Insights on Cooperation towards Circular Economy Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Elena Simina Lakatos & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Andrea Szilagyi & Andreea Loredana Bîrgovan & Elena Cristina Rada, 2023. "Smokers’ Attitude and Behavior towards Cigarette Littering in Romania: A Survey-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Fonseca Luis Miguel & Domingues José Pedro, 2018. "Adoption of Circular Economy concepts and practices by Portuguese Citizens and Companies," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 374-385, May.
    8. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    9. Diana Baidoc & Laura Bacali, 2017. "Impact of innovation on sustainable development of organizations," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 14(2), pages 5-18, December.
    10. Madalina-Ioana BADILA & Ghita BARSAN & Danut-Eugeniu MOSTEANU & Benoni SFARLOG & Ruxandra MOSTEANU, 2018. "The Place Of Wics Model In The Governance Of An Automotive Systems Corporation," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 733-740, November.
    11. Navarro Ferronato & Carolina D’Avino & Marco Ragazzi & Vincenzo Torretta & Giovanni De Feo, 2017. "Social Surveys about Solid Waste Management within Higher Education Institutes: A Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Gherghina Rodica & Georgescu Cretan Georgiana Camelia & Duca Ioana & Postole Anca Mirela, 2023. "Assessing the Electric and Electronic Devices Acquisition in Romania within the Context of Circular Economy Requirements A Poisson Regression Approach," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 605-617, July.
    13. Elzbieta Szczygiel, 2023. "Circular Behaviours of Polish Consumers in Relation to Electrical and Electronic Products," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(62), pages 213-213, February.
    14. Damjan Krajnc & Darko Kovačič & Eva Žunec & Kristijan Brglez & Rebeka Kovačič Lukman, 2022. "Youth Awareness and Attitudes towards a Circular Economy to Achieve the Green Deal Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Alexandra Cotae & Laura Bacali, 2017. "The influence of national culture on business organizations' commitment to environment sustainability in the European Union," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 14(2), pages 19-29, December.
    16. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Maria Teresa Pereira & Florinda Figueiredo Martins & Dominik Zimon, 2018. "Assessment of Circular Economy within Portuguese Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Tatjana Mamula Nikolić & Ivan Paunović & Mirjana Milovanović & Nenad Lozović & Marija Đurović, 2022. "Examining Generation Z’s Attitudes, Behavior and Awareness Regarding Eco-Products: A Bayesian Approach to Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Elena-Simina Lakatos & Ligia-Maria Nan & Laura Bacali & George Ciobanu & Andreea-Maria Ciobanu & Lucian-Ionel Cioca, 2021. "Consumer Satisfaction towards Green Products: Empirical Insights from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Anna Avdiushchenko, 2018. "Toward a Circular Economy Regional Monitoring Framework for European Regions: Conceptual Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Juana Camacho-Otero & Casper Boks & Ida Nilstad Pettersen, 2018. "Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:401-:d:92451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.