IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2013i1p158-174d31684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Roof Waterproofing Methods Considering LCCO 2

Author

Listed:
  • Sangyong Kim

    (School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading, Whiteknights PO Box 219, Reading RG6 6AW, UK)

  • Gwang-Hee Kim

    (Department of Plant/Architectural Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do 443-760, Korea)

  • Young-Do Lee

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Kyungdong University, Gosung-Goon, Gwangwon-do 219-705, Korea)

Abstract

In a construction project, selection of an appropriate method in the planning/design stage is very important for ensuring effective project implementation and success. Many companies have adopted the life cycle cost (LCC) method, one of the methods for analyzing economic efficiency, for appropriate decision-making in the basic/detailed design stage by estimating overall costs and expenses generated over the entire project. This paper presents an LCC method for calculating the LCC of CO 2 (LCCO 2 ), based on materials committed during the lifecycle of a structure for each roof waterproofing method and adding this cost to the LCC for comparative analysis. Thus, this technique presents the LCC that includes the cost of CO 2 emission. The results show that in terms of initial construction cost, asphalt waterproofing had the highest CO 2 emission cost, followed by sheet waterproofing. LCCO 2 did not greatly influence the initial construction cost and maintenance cost, as it is relatively smaller than the LCC. However, when the number of durable years was changed, the LCC showed some changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangyong Kim & Gwang-Hee Kim & Young-Do Lee, 2013. "Sustainability Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Roof Waterproofing Methods Considering LCCO 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2013:i:1:p:158-174:d:31684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/1/158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/1/158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamad Monkiz Khasreen & Phillip F. G. Banfill & Gillian F. Menzies, 2009. "Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Lin Gao & Zach C. Winfield, 2012. "Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Advanced Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna Rucińska & Anna Komerska & Jerzy Kwiatkowski, 2020. "Preliminary Study on the GWP Benchmark of Office Buildings in Poland Using the LCA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Filippín, Celina & Ricard, Florencia & Flores Larsen, Silvana & Santamouris, Mattheos, 2017. "Retrospective analysis of the energy consumption of single-family dwellings in central Argentina. Retrofitting and adaptation to the climate change," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1226-1241.
    3. Dixit, Manish K. & Culp, Charles H. & Fernández-Solís, Jose L., 2013. "System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: A conceptual model for definition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 153-164.
    4. Anca N. Iuga (Butnariu) & Vasile N. Popa & Luminița I. Popa, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Automotive Products Regarding the Influence of Eco-Friendly Methods to Emissions’ Reduction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Hyojin Lim & Sungho Tae & Seungjun Roh, 2018. "Analysis of the Primary Building Materials in Support of G-SEED Life Cycle Assessment in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Tian Wu & Mengbo Zhang & Xunmin Ou, 2014. "Analysis of Future Vehicle Energy Demand in China Based on a Gompertz Function Method and Computable General Equilibrium Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-29, November.
    7. Padmanathan K. & Uma Govindarajan & Vigna K. Ramachandaramurthy & Sudar Oli Selvi T., 2017. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Based Economic Analysis of Solar PV System with Respect to Performance Investigation for Indian Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Mária Moresová & Mariana Sedliačiková & Jarmila Schmidtová & Iveta Hajdúchová, 2020. "Green Development in the Construction of Family Houses in Urban and Rural Settlements in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz & Yusoff, Sumiani, 2015. "A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 244-248.
    10. David Božiček & Roman Kunič & Aleš Krainer & Uroš Stritih & Mateja Dovjak, 2023. "Mutual Influence of External Wall Thermal Transmittance, Thermal Inertia, and Room Orientation on Office Thermal Comfort and Energy Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, April.
    11. Ali Karji & Mostafa Namian & Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli, 2020. "Identifying the Key Barriers to Promote Sustainable Construction in the United States: A Principal Component Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Eleftheriadis, Stathis & Mumovic, Dejan & Greening, Paul, 2017. "Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 811-825.
    13. Ahmad Faiz Abd Rashid & Juferi Idris & Sumiani Yusoff, 2017. "Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Yvan Dutil & Daniel Rousse & Guillermo Quesada, 2011. "Sustainable Buildings: An Ever Evolving Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Yvan Dutil & Daniel Rousse, 2012. "Energy Costs of Energy Savings in Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(8), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Bauer, Christian & Hofer, Johannes & Althaus, Hans-Jörg & Del Duce, Andrea & Simons, Andrew, 2015. "The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 871-883.
    17. Venkatraj, V. & Dixit, M.K., 2022. "Challenges in implementing data-driven approaches for building life cycle energy assessment: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Petrovic, Bojana & Myhren, Jonn Are & Zhang, Xingxing & Wallhagen, Marita & Eriksson, Ola, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of a wooden single-family house in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Najjar, Mohammad & Figueiredo, Karoline & Hammad, Ahmed W.A. & Haddad, Assed, 2019. "Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1366-1382.
    20. Renjie Wang & Yuanyuan Song & Honglei Xu & Yue Li & Jie Liu, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emission from HEV, PHEV and BEV for China in the Past, Present and Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2013:i:1:p:158-174:d:31684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.