IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4081-d1647415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Potential Barrier Factors of AI Chatbot Usage Among Teacher Trainees: From the Perspective of Innovation Resistance Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yonggang Liu

    (Institute for Advanced and Smart Digital Opportunities, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia)

  • Hapini Awang

    (Institute for Advanced and Smart Digital Opportunities, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia)

  • Nur Suhaili Mansor

    (Institute for Advanced and Smart Digital Opportunities, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Malaysia)

Abstract

With the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, more and more AI chatbots (e.g., ChatGPT and DeepSeek) are beginning to affect work and lifestyles. Although AI chatbots have brought many opportunities to education and teacher trainees, they have also caused many problems and resistance among some teacher trainees. However, previous studies have focused more on the influence of positive acceptance factors induced by AI chatbots and less on the negative barrier model induced by AI chatbots. Therefore, this study starts from the negative barrier factors induced by AI chatbots and builds an influencing barrier model of AI chatbot resistance guided by Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) and appropriately draws on Cultural Dimension Theory (CDT), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and practical characteristics. The questionnaires mainly adopt convenience sampling and snowball sampling methods, and the data are empirically analyzed. The results show that Uncertainty Avoidance, the Social Influence Barrier, and Technology Anxiety have a significant and direct influence on teacher trainees’ resistance to AI chatbots. Meanwhile, Uncertainty Avoidance, the Social Influence Barrier, and Technology Anxiety play significant mediating roles in the impact of the Usage Barrier (UB), Image Barrier (IB), Value Barrier (VB), Risk Barrier (RB), and Tradition Barrier (TB) on resistance behaviors, revealing the complex path through which cognition-emotion-society factors jointly shape technology resistance behaviors. Therefore, this study not only contributes to enriching the theoretical results of combining Innovation Resistance Theory with AI chatbots and adding new research paths (e.g., the mediating role of Uncertainty Avoidance) but also provides a practical guide for the dissemination of AI chatbots among teacher trainees and future technological talents in a sustainable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yonggang Liu & Hapini Awang & Nur Suhaili Mansor, 2025. "Exploring the Potential Barrier Factors of AI Chatbot Usage Among Teacher Trainees: From the Perspective of Innovation Resistance Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4081-:d:1647415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    2. Hew, Jun-Jie & Leong, Lai-Ying & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Lee, Voon-Hsien, 2019. "The age of mobile social commerce: An Artificial Neural Network analysis on its resistances," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 311-324.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    4. Hong, Fei, 2023. "Impact of economic," OSF Preprints s79c8, Center for Open Science.
    5. Yingying Yang & Peng Lu & Yuanyuan Niu & Guohong Yuan, 2024. "Research on Unmanned Smart Hotels Resistance from the Perspective of Innovation Resistance Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    6. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Aruna Polisetty & G Sowmya & Subhajit Pahari, 2023. "Streaming towards innovation: Understanding consumer adoption of OTT services through IRT and TAM," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 2283917-228, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Wang, Guoqiang & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Yuan, Yunpeng & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    5. Müller-Seitz, Gordon & Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Creusen, Utho & Stromereder, Christine, 2009. "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-39.
    6. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.
    7. Sarker, Prianka & Hughes, Laurie & Malik, Tegwen & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2025. "Examining consumer adoption of social commerce: An extended META-UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Chhabra, Varun & Rajan, Prashant & Chopra, Shweta, 2020. "User Acceptance of New Technology in Mandatory Adoption Scenario for Food Distribution in India," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(02), April.
    9. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Herbjørn Nysveen & Per Egil Pedersen, 2016. "Consumer adoption of RFID-enabled services. Applying an extended UTAUT model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 293-314, April.
    11. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Rajiv Kumar & Arindam Mukherjee & Amit Sachan, 2023. "Factors influencing indirect adoption of e-Government services: a qualitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 471-504, September.
    14. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    16. Tianyang Huang, 2023. "Using SOR framework to explore the driving factors of older adults smartphone use behavior," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. repec:zag:market:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:229-245 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Asrar Ahmed Sabir & Iftikhar Ahmad & Hassan Ahmad & Muhammad Rafiq & Muhammad Asghar Khan & Neelum Noreen, 2023. "Consumer Acceptance and Adoption of AI Robo-Advisors in Fintech Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Chen, Ching-Fu & White, Christopher & Hsieh, Yi-En, 2020. "The role of consumer participation readiness in automated parcel station usage intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Renz, Sabrina & Kalimeris, Jeanette & Hofreiter, Sebastian & Spörrle, Matthias, 2024. "Me, myself and AI: How gender, personality and emotions determine willingness to use Strong AI for self-improvement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    21. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4081-:d:1647415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.