IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3925-d1643676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultivar-Specific Responses of Spinach to Root-Zone Cooling in Hydroponic Systems in a Greenhouse Under Warm Climates

Author

Listed:
  • Md Noor E Azam Khan

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Dallas, TX 75252, USA)

  • Joseph Masabni

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Dallas, TX 75252, USA)

  • Genhua Niu

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Dallas, TX 75252, USA)

Abstract

Growing spinach year-round via greenhouse hydroponics in warm climates can be challenging because of the intolerance of many spinach cultivars to heat. Root-zone cooling in hydroponic systems in warm climates may be a promising cooling method to alleviate heat stress; however, its effectiveness is still unknown in spinach plants. This study aimed to investigate the impact of root-zone cooling on the growth and physiological responses of four spinach cultivars (‘Lakeside’, ‘Hammerhead’, ‘Mandolin’, and ‘SV2157’) grown in deep water culture hydroponic systems in a greenhouse during the summer season in two growing cycles. The experiment consisted of the following three root-zone temperatures (RZTs): Control (ambient water temperature), RZT24 (24 °C), and RZT21 (21 °C). Among the four cultivars, ‘SV2157’ performed equally regardless of the treatment, demonstrating superior heat tolerance versus the other three cultivars. ‘Mandolin’ exhibited the greatest benefit from root-zone cooling, with increases in shoot dry weights of 87% and 94% under RZT24 and RZT21, respectively, compared to those under control treatment. Additionally, total leaf areas significantly increased under the two root-zone cooling treatments. ‘Lakeside’ and ‘Hammerhead’ generally benefited from root-zone cooling, although the magnitude of growth increases was small or statistically insignificant. However, ‘Lakeside’ and ‘Hammerhead’ were highly responsive to lower ambient air temperatures, as evidenced by increases of 121% and 90%, respectively, in shoot fresh weights across the treatments in Cycle 2 (average air temperature of 24.7 °C) compared to those in Cycle 1 (29.3 °C). Physiological responses to root-zone cooling varied among cultivars, with ‘SV2157’ exhibiting the highest chlorophyll, carotenoid, and anthocyanin levels. Higher total phenolic contents under control treatment in Cycle 1 in all three cultivars except for ‘SV2157’ suggested greater reactive oxygen species production, indicating oxidative stress. Root-zone cooling reduced oxidative stress indicators, including mortality (%), hydrogen peroxide content, and malondialdehyde content, and minimized cell leakage. Based on plant growth, physiological and biochemical traits, and electricity consumption, cooling the root zone to 24 °C rather than 21 °C is recommended for hot summers with high air temperatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Noor E Azam Khan & Joseph Masabni & Genhua Niu, 2025. "Cultivar-Specific Responses of Spinach to Root-Zone Cooling in Hydroponic Systems in a Greenhouse Under Warm Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3925-:d:1643676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guilherme Lages Barbosa & Francisca Daiane Almeida Gadelha & Natalya Kublik & Alan Proctor & Lucas Reichelm & Emily Weissinger & Gregory M. Wohlleb & Rolf U. Halden, 2015. "Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pereira, J. & Gomes, M. Glória, 2025. "Lighting strategies in vertical urban farming for enhancement of plant productivity and energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    2. Feng, Yongbing & Gao, Guohua & Wang, Pengyu & Zhang, Zihua, 2024. "Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Yi-Xuan Lu & Si-Ting Wang & Guan-Xin Yao & Jing Xu, 2023. "Green Total Factor Efficiency in Vegetable Production: A Comprehensive Ecological Analysis of China’s Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Ehsan Daneshyar, 2024. "Residential Rooftop Urban Agriculture: Architectural Design Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.
    5. Andrea Boccardo & Geoffrey Hagelaar & Catriona Lakemond, 2023. "Evaluation of crises suitability of food systems: a comparison of alternative protein sources," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(6), pages 1647-1665, December.
    6. Mabel Adaeze Nwanojuo & Christian Kosisochukwu Anumudu & Helen Onyeaka, 2025. "Impact of Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) in Nigeria, a Review of the Future of Farming in Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Xuepeng Shi & Chengfei Shi & Abel Tablada & Xiaoyu Guan & Mingfeng Cui & Yangxiao Rong & Qiqi Zhang & Xudong Xie, 2025. "A Review of Research Progress in Vertical Farming on Façades: Design, Technology, and Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-46, January.
    8. Muhammad Azhar Ansari & Giovanni Ciampi & Sergio Sibilio, 2023. "Tackling Efficiency Challenges and Exploring Greenhouse-Integrated Organic Photovoltaics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Rosnani Abd Ghani & Suhana Omar & Márton Jolánkai & Ákos Tarnawa & Noriza Khalid & Mária Katalin Kassai & Zoltán Kende, 2023. "Response of Shoot and Root Growth, Yield, and Chemical Composition to Nutrient Concentrations in Soybean Varieties Grown under Soilless and Controlled Environment Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Tan, Xu & Abedi, Mahyar & Klausner, James F. & Bénard, André, 2024. "Modeling and experimental validation of light-splitting semi-transparent solar water heater using NIR cut-off film as the rooftop of a greenhouse for arid regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    11. Maria Vrublevskaya & Thi Tra My Nguyenová & Lucie Drábová & Petra Lovecká & Blanka Vrchotová & Olga Maťátková & Markéta Kulišová & Irena Jarošová Kolouchová, 2023. "Biodiversity of Vitis vinifera endophytes in conventional and biodynamic vineyard," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(1), pages 44-53.
    12. Michael Graham Parkes & Rebekah O’Rourke & Tiago Domingos & Ricardo F. M. Teixeira, 2023. "An Experimental Portuguese Social-Enterprise Project in Urban Agriculture: A Case Study on the Influence of the Interaction of Stakeholder Roles on Sustainable Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Lukas Simon Kriem & Carsten Pietzka & Marc Beckett & Luisa Gärtling & Benjamin Wriedt, 2023. "Electrochemical In Situ Hydrogen Peroxide Production Can Reduce Microbial Load in Bioponic Nutrient Solutions Derived from Organic Waste," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Yi-Ming Qin & Yu-Hao Tu & Tao Li & Yao Ni & Rui-Feng Wang & Haihua Wang, 2025. "Deep Learning for Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Review on Applications in Lettuce Cultivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-33, April.
    15. Dimitra I. Pomoni & Maria K. Koukou & Michail Gr. Vrachopoulos & Labros Vasiliadis, 2023. "A Review of Hydroponics and Conventional Agriculture Based on Energy and Water Consumption, Environmental Impact, and Land Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Sustainable Agriculture: Review of Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Cai, Wenyi & Bu, Kunlang & Zha, Lingyan & Zhang, Jingjin & Lai, Dayi & Bao, Hua, 2025. "Energy consumption of plant factory with artificial light: Challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. Mahrokh Farvardin & Morteza Taki & Shiva Gorjian & Edris Shabani & Julio C. Sosa-Savedra, 2024. "Assessing the Physical and Environmental Aspects of Greenhouse Cultivation: A Comprehensive Review of Conventional and Hydroponic Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3925-:d:1643676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.