IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3667-d1637539.html

Uncovering the Mechanism of Elevating High-Tech Export Competitiveness in China’s Sustainable Economic Development: Force of Digital Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Genhua Hu

    (Anhui Institute for Innovation-Driven Development, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China
    School of Business, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China)

  • Xuejian Zhang

    (School of Business, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China)

  • Jing Yang

    (School of Business, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China)

  • Wenda Sun

    (School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

  • Tingting Zhu

    (School of Business, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China)

Abstract

The accelerating growth of the digital economy is fundamentally transforming international trade patterns and increasingly contributing to sustainable economic progress. Despite this, there is still limited research on how it influences the competitiveness of high-tech exports. Addressing this research gap, the present study investigates the mechanisms through which the digital economy strengthens the competitiveness of high-tech exports—an essential engine for sustainable growth. China, recognized as a leader in digital innovation, serves as the focal point of this analysis. Drawing on panel data spanning from 2011 to 2021 across 30 provincial-level regions (including municipalities and autonomous areas), we develop a multidimensional index that captures the extent of industrial digitalization, digital industrialization, and the digital development environment. Our econometric analysis uncovers direct and indirect mechanisms through which digitalization reduces trade costs, accelerates innovation-led business models, and lowers market entry barriers, thereby promoting sustainable industrial upgrading. Moreover, we reveal that digital integration contributes to narrowing regional disparities, fostering inclusive and resilient economic growth. A double-threshold effect is identified, where the initial high costs of digital adoption yield substantial long-term sustainability benefits. These findings offer critical insights for policymakers seeking to align high-tech industrial strategies with sustainable development goals, ensuring an equitable and innovation-driven digital economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Genhua Hu & Xuejian Zhang & Jing Yang & Wenda Sun & Tingting Zhu, 2025. "Uncovering the Mechanism of Elevating High-Tech Export Competitiveness in China’s Sustainable Economic Development: Force of Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-32, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3667-:d:1637539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3667/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3667/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Suling & Zhang, Rong & Di, Danyang & Li, Guoxiang, 2024. "Does digital transformation promote global value chain upgrading? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Qiong Wang & Yihan Wei, 2023. "Research on the Influence of Digital Economy on Technological Innovation: Evidence from Manufacturing Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Li, Hao & Han, Jian & Xu, Yayun, 2023. "The effect of the digital economy on services exports competitiveness and ternary margins," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7).
    4. Qingjun Li & Shuliang Zhao, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Economy Development on Industrial Restructuring: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman, 1993. "Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262570971, December.
    6. Dinopoulos, Elias & Oehmke, James F. & Segerstrom, Paul S., 1993. "High-technology-industry trade and investment : The role of factor endowments," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-2), pages 49-71, February.
    7. Hanyu Zhang & Kaiyue Zhang & Taihua Yan & Xiaonan Cao, 2025. "The impact of digital infrastructure on regional green innovation efficiency through industrial agglomeration and diversification," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    9. Jinqi Su & Ke Su & Shubin Wang, 2021. "Does the Digital Economy Promote Industrial Structural Upgrading?—A Test of Mediating Effects Based on Heterogeneous Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Nucci, Francesco & Puccioni, Chiara & Ricchi, Ottavio, 2023. "Digital technologies and productivity: A firm-level investigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingyao Wang & Taofeng Wu & Fangrong Ren, 2025. "Exploring the Role of Digital Economy in Energy Optimization of Manufacturing Industry Under the Constraint of Carbon Reduction? Based on Spatial Panel Threshold Hybrid Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Hongying Zhang & Chengxuan Geng & Dongqin Cao & Jiahui Wei, 2024. "Can high-tech industrial convergence promote green innovation efficiency? Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23579-23611, September.
    3. Chenggang Li & Jun Wan & Zhenci Xu & Tao Lin, 2021. "Impacts of Green Innovation, Institutional Constraints and Their Interactions on High-Quality Economic Development across China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Yihao Li & Chuanwen Yu & Jiansheng You & Jing Yang & Shaoyong Ye, 2025. "The Digital Economy, Residents’ Consumption Upgrade, and the High-Quality Development of the Sports Industry: Evidence from Eastern China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    5. Wang, Huiqing & Wei, Weixian, 2020. "Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: The optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Chen, Feng-Wen & Xu, Jingwei & Wang, Jiang & Li, Zhilong & Wu, Yongqiu, 2023. "Do rising labour costs promote technology upgrading? A novel theoretical hypothesis of an inverted U-shaped relationship," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 327-341.
    7. Yanhong Liu & Xinjian Huang & Weiliang Chen, 2019. "Threshold Effect of High-Tech Industrial Scale on Green Development—Evidence from Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Qu, Yingzi & Fan, Sha, 2024. "Is there a "Machine Substitution"? How does the digital economy reshape the employment structure in emerging market countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    9. Zhou, Kuo & Qu, Zhi & Guo, Yiman & Hu, Runnian, 2025. "Does a firm's intelligent technological transformation matter for its access to financial resources?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Jiachao Peng & Hanfei Chen & Lei Jia & Shuke Fu & Jiali Tian, 2023. "Impact of Digital Industrialization on the Energy Industry Supply Chain: Evidence from the Natural Gas Industry in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    11. Chunhua Luo & Dianlong Wei & Wunhong Su & Jinjing Lu, 2023. "Association between Regional Digitalization and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Chiu, Chien-Liang & Chang, Ting-Huan, 2009. "What proportion of renewable energy supplies is needed to initially mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD member countries?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1669-1674, August.
    13. Nicolas Canry & Julien Fouquau & Sébastien Lechevalier, 2011. "Sectoral Price Dynamics in Japan: A Threshold Approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(2), pages 1322-1335.
    14. Jean C. Kouam & Simplice Asongu, 2022. "The non-linear effects of fixed broadband on economic growth in Africa," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 50(5), pages 881-895, August.
    15. Khémiri, Wafa & Noubbigh, Hédi, 2020. "Size-threshold effect in debt-firm performance nexus in the sub-Saharan region: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 335-344.
    16. Simplice A. Asongu & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2020. "Insurance Policy Thresholds for Economic Growth in Africa," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(3), pages 672-689, July.
    17. Fang, Hao & Chung, Chien-Ping & Lee, Yen-Hsien, 2025. "Moderating effect of credit growth for financial development on economic growth: Considering banking crises and endogeneity," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Jingwen Lu & Lihua Dai, 2023. "Examining the Threshold Effect of Environmental Regulation: The Impact of Agricultural Product Trade Openness on Agricultural Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Ostadzad, Ali Hossein, 2022. "Innovation and carbon emissions: Fixed-effects panel threshold model estimation for renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 602-617.
    20. Yugang He & Chunlei Wang, 2022. "Does Buddhist Tourism Successfully Result in Local Sustainable Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3667-:d:1637539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.