IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3380-d1632117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Compliance of Environmental Disclosures by Energy Companies Using GRI Standards with European Sustainability Reporting Standards: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Łukasz Matuszak

    (Department of Accounting and Financial Audit, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

  • Ewa Różańska

    (Department of Accounting and Financial Audit, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz

    (Department of Accounting and Financial Audit, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) has maintained the world’s most comprehensive and dominant sustainability reporting standards. While primarily voluntary, they were widely used by energy companies, especially in the environmental disclosure area. With the recent introduction of the mandatory European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), companies may face challenges transitioning from GRI to ESRS. In this context, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the GRI Standards and the ESRS, focusing on their environmental disclosure requirements (‘E’). The purpose of our study is to evaluate the current level of environmental reporting by Polish energy companies based on GRI Standards, assess their compliance with the ESRS requirements under the ‘E’ pillar, and determine the role of GRI disclosures in facilitating the transition to the new standards. A case study approach was employed, using data manually collected from 2023 reports prepared according to GRI Standards by Polish energy companies. Content analysis and the GRI-ESRS Interoperability Index were applied. The findings reveal notable differences in the application of GRI Standards among the companies. The level of environmental disclosures based on GRI Standards is relatively low compared to ESRS requirements, suggesting that companies will face challenges in setting up systems to meet future reporting requirements. This study provides insights into current and emerging practices in environmental reporting, offering valuable implications for EU energy companies preparing their environmental reports in accordance with ESRS requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Łukasz Matuszak & Ewa Różańska & Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz, 2025. "Assessment of the Compliance of Environmental Disclosures by Energy Companies Using GRI Standards with European Sustainability Reporting Standards: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3380-:d:1632117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Joanna Błażyńska & Beata Zaleska & Farid Ullah & Windham Eugene Loopesko, 2022. "Compliance with Corporate Governance Principles by Energy Companies Compared with All Companies Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, September.
    2. David Talbot & Olivier Boiral, 2018. "GHG Reporting and Impression Management: An Assessment of Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 367-383, January.
    3. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Przemysław Mućko, 2016. "CSR Reporting Practices of Polish Energy and Mining Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Dominik Dienes & Remmer Sassen & Jasmin Fischer, 2016. "What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 154-189, May.
    5. Halkos, George & Nomikos, Stylianos, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 106-117.
    6. Dominik Dienes & Remmer Sassen & Jasmin Fischer, 2016. "What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 154-189, May.
    7. Daniela Nicoleta Sahlian & Adriana Florina Popa & Ștefania Amalia Nicoară & Corina Graziella Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Examining the Causality between Integrated Reporting and Stock Market Capitalization. The Case of the European Renewable Energy Equipment and Services Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Windham Eugene Loopesko & Farid Ullah, 2022. "A Model of Risk Information Disclosures in Non-Financial Corporate Reports of Socially Responsible Energy Companies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    9. Anna Bartoszewicz & Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz, 2022. "Evolution of Energy Companies’ Non-Financial Disclosures: A Model of Non-Financial Reports in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-32, October.
    10. Hanna E. Czaja-Cieszyńska & Dominika Kordela, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting in Energy Companies—Is There a Link between Social Disclosures, the Experience and Market Value?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanna E. Czaja-Cieszyńska & Dominika Kordela, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting in Energy Companies—Is There a Link between Social Disclosures, the Experience and Market Value?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Mahdi Alhamami, 2023. "Do Corporate Governance Internal Characteristics Affect the Level of Sustainability Reporting in Saudi Arabian Banks?," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 123-123, June.
    4. Francesco Gangi & Jérôme Méric & Rémi Jardat & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Business for society," Post-Print hal-02382307, HAL.
    5. Louis Maximilian Ronalter & Merce Bernardo & Javier Manuel Romaní, 2023. "Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: a cross-regional empirical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9067-9109, September.
    6. Pei‐Chi Kelly Hsiao & Charl de Villiers & Claire Horner & Hein Oosthuizen, 2022. "A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4453-4483, December.
    7. Mariusz Zieliński & Małgorzata Adamska, 2022. "ESG Assessment from the Perspective of the Management Board and Trade Unions on the Example of the Opole Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko & Marek Szafraniec, 2020. "Greenhouse Gases and Circular Economy Issues in Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-36, November.
    9. Monday Nweke Igwe & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Ayman Hassan Bazhair, 2023. "Sustainability reporting in Africa: A systematic review and agenda for future research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2081-2100, September.
    10. Francisca Castilla‐Polo & M. Dolores Guerrero‐Baena, 2023. "The business case for sustainability reporting in SMEs: consultants' and academics' perceptions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3224-3238, October.
    11. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Karaman, Abdullah S. & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali, 2020. "Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. George Halkos & Stylianos Nomikos & Kyriaki Tsilika, 2022. "Evidence for Novel Structures Relating CSR Reporting and Economic Welfare: Environmental Sustainability—A Continent-Level Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 415-444, February.
    13. Ramona Zharfpeykan & Davood Askarany, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting and Organisational Factors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Marta Szczepańczyk & Paweł Nowodziński & Adam Sikorski, 2023. "ESG Strategy and Financial Aspects Using the Example of an Oil and Gas Midstream Company: The UNIMOT Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    17. David Talbot & Olivier Boiral, 2021. "Public organizations and biodiversity disclosure: Saving face to meet a legal obligation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2571-2586, July.
    18. Simone Pizzi, 2018. "The Relationship between Non-financial Reporting, Environmental Strategies and Financial Performance. Empirical Evidence from Milano Stock Exchange," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-9, November.
    19. Ali Uyar & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Do shareholders reward or punish risky firms due to CSR reporting and assurance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1596-1620, July.
    20. Chen, Pengyu & Chu, Zhongzhu & Zhao, Miao, 2024. "The Road to corporate sustainability: The importance of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3380-:d:1632117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.