IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i4p4978-5005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Reporting, Stakeholders' Perspective and Sustainable Disclosure: Systematic Insights From Empirical Research

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Izzo
  • Antonella Russo
  • Gianluca Risaliti

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a surge in academic and professional debates regarding the role of integrated reporting (IR) as a potential instrument for disclosing a set of comprehensive information to the stakeholder, integrating the company's sustainability performance. Although the literature on IR has rapidly progressed, the role of IR in the sustainability domain remains controversial, partly due to differing interpretations and insufficient focus on holistic frameworks. By drawing upon the theoretical foundations of stakeholder theory, this study aims to address this issue with a systematic review of 170 empirical studies published in high‐quality journals between 2012 and 2023. Our analysis shows that the empirical research has evolved around four key themes—IR adoption, IR quality, IR assurance, IR Efficiency—each contributing to clarifying the role of IR as a stakeholder‐oriented reporting practice. We found that the literature is almost balanced between qualitative and quantitative approaches, with stakeholder theory most often employed to examine the benefits of IR in managing stakeholder relationships as part of corporate strategy. The review opens future research avenues for investigation on less explored topics and sub‐fields in IR for supporting the role of a holistic‐integrated approach in the sustainability agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Izzo & Antonella Russo & Gianluca Risaliti, 2025. "Integrated Reporting, Stakeholders' Perspective and Sustainable Disclosure: Systematic Insights From Empirical Research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 4978-5005, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:4978-5005
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:4978-5005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.